[Congressional Record Volume 164, Number 62 (Tuesday, April 17, 2018)]
[House]
[Pages H3377-H3381]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
PROTECTING CHILDREN FROM IDENTITY THEFT ACT
Mr. CURBELO of Florida. Mr. Speaker, pursuant to House Resolution
830, I call up the bill (H.R. 5192) to authorize the Commissioner of
Social Security to provide confirmation of fraud protection data to
certain permitted entities, and for other purposes, and ask for its
immediate consideration in the House.
The Clerk read the title of the bill.
The SPEAKER pro tempore (Mr. Stewart). Pursuant to House Resolution
830, in lieu of the amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended
by the Committee on Ways and Means printed in the bill, an amendment in
the nature of a substitute consisting of the text of Rules Committee
Print 115-68 is adopted, and the bill, as amended, is considered read.
The text of the bill, as amended, is as follows:
H.R. 5192
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of
the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ``Protecting Children from
Identity Theft Act''.
SEC. 2. REDUCING IDENTITY FRAUD.
(a) Purpose.--The purpose of this section is to reduce the
prevalence of synthetic identity fraud, which
disproportionally affects vulnerable populations, such as
minors and recent immigrants, by facilitating the validation
by permitted entities of fraud protection data, pursuant to
electronically received consumer consent, through use of a
database maintained by the Commissioner.
(b) Definitions.--In this section:
(1) Commissioner.--The term ``Commissioner'' means the
Commissioner of the Social Security Administration.
(2) Financial institution.--The term ``financial
institution'' has the meaning given the term in section 509
of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (15 U.S.C. 6809).
(3) Fraud protection data.--The term ``fraud protection
data'' means a combination of the following information with
respect to an individual:
(A) The name of the individual (including the first name
and any family forename or surname of the individual).
(B) The Social Security account number of the individual.
(C) The date of birth (including the month, day, and year)
of the individual.
(4) Permitted entity.--The term ``permitted entity'' means
a financial institution or a service provider, subsidiary,
affiliate, agent, contractor, or assignee of a financial
institution.
(c) Efficiency.--
(1) Reliance on existing methods.--The Commissioner shall
evaluate the feasibility of making modifications to any
database that is in existence as of the date of enactment of
this Act or a similar resource such that the database or
resource--
(A) is reasonably designed to effectuate the purpose of
this section; and
(B) meets the requirements of subsection (d).
(2) Execution.--The Commissioner shall establish a system
to carry out subsection (a), in accordance with section 1106
of the Social Security Act. In doing so, the Commissioner
shall make the modifications necessary to any database that
is in existence as of the date of enactment of this Act or
similar resource, or develop a database or similar resource.
(d) Protection of Vulnerable Consumers.--The database or
similar resource described in subsection (c) shall--
(1) compare fraud protection data provided in an inquiry by
a permitted entity against such information maintained by the
Commissioner in order to confirm (or not confirm) the
validity of the information provided, and in such a manner as
to deter fraudulent use of the database or similar resource;
(2) be scalable and accommodate reasonably anticipated
volumes of verification requests from permitted entities with
commercially reasonable uptime and availability; and
(3) allow permitted entities to submit--
(A) one or more individual requests electronically for
real-time machine-to-machine (or similar functionality)
accurate responses; and
(B) multiple requests electronically, such as those
provided in a batch format, for accurate electronic responses
within a reasonable period of time from submission, not to
exceed 24 hours.
(e) Certification Required.--Before providing confirmation
of fraud protection data to a permitted entity, the
Commissioner shall ensure that the Commissioner has a
certification from the permitted entity that is dated not
more than 2 years before the date on which that confirmation
is provided that includes the following declarations:
(1) The entity is a permitted entity.
(2) The entity is in compliance with this section.
[[Page H3378]]
(3) The entity is, and will remain, in compliance with its
privacy and data security requirements, as described in title
V of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (15 U.S.C. 6801 et seq.) and
as required by the Commissioner, with respect to information
the entity receives from the Commissioner pursuant to this
section.
(4) The entity will retain sufficient records to
demonstrate its compliance with its certification and this
section for a period of not less than 2 years.
(f) Consumer Consent.--
(1) In general.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law
or regulation, a permitted entity may submit a request to the
database or similar resource described in subsection (c)
only--
(A) pursuant to the written, including electronic, consent
received by a permitted entity from the individual who is the
subject of the request; and
(B) in connection with any circumstance described in
section 604 of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (15 U.S.C.
1681b).
(2) Electronic consent requirements.--For a permitted
entity to use the consent of an individual received
electronically pursuant to paragraph (1)(A), the permitted
entity must obtain the individual's electronic signature, as
defined in section 106 of the Electronic Signatures in Global
and National Commerce Act (15 U.S.C. 7006). Permitted
entities must develop and use an electronic signature process
in accordance with all Federal laws and requirements as
designated by the Commissioner.
(3) Effectuating electronic consent.--No provision of law
or requirement, including section 552a of title 5, United
States Code, shall prevent the use of electronic consent for
purposes of this subsection or for use in any other consent
based verification under the discretion of the Commissioner.
(g) Compliance and Enforcement.--
(1) Audits and monitoring.--
(A) In general.--The Commissioner--
(i) shall conduct audits and monitoring to--
(I) ensure proper use by permitted entities of the database
or similar resource described in subsection (c); and
(II) deter fraud and misuse by permitted entities with
respect to the database or similar resource described in
subsection (c); and
(ii) may terminate services for any permitted entity that
prevents or refuses to allow the Commissioner to carry out
the activities described in clause (i) and may terminate or
suspend services for any permitted entity as necessary to
enforce any violation of this section or of any certification
made under this section.
(2) Enforcement.--
(A) In general.--Notwithstanding any other provision of
law, including the matter preceding paragraph (1) of section
505(a) of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (15 U.S.C. 6805(a)), any
violation of this section and any certification made under
this section shall be enforced in accordance with paragraphs
(1) through (7) of such section 505(a) by the agencies
described in those paragraphs.
(B) Relevant information.--Upon discovery by the
Commissioner of any violation of this section or any
certification made under this section, the Commissioner shall
forward any relevant information pertaining to that violation
to the appropriate agency described in subparagraph (A) for
evaluation by the agency for purposes of enforcing this
section.
(h) Recovery of Costs.--
(1) In general.--
(A) In general.--Amounts obligated to carry out this
section shall be fully recovered from the users of the
database or verification system by way of advances,
reimbursements, user fees, or other recoveries as determined
by the Commissioner. The funds recovered under this paragraph
shall be deposited as an offsetting collection to the account
providing appropriations for the Social Security
Administration, to be used for the administration of this
section without fiscal year limitation.
(B) Prices fixed by commissioner.--The Commissioner shall
establish the amount to be paid by the users under this
paragraph, including the costs of any services or work
performed, such as any appropriate upgrades, maintenance, and
associated direct and indirect administrative costs, in
support of carrying out the purposes described in this
section, by reimbursement or in advance as determined by the
Commissioner. The amount of such prices shall be periodically
adjusted by the Commissioner to ensure that amounts collected
are sufficient to fully offset the cost of the administration
of this section.
(2) Initial development.--The Commissioner shall not begin
development of a verification system to carry out this
section until the Commissioner determines that amounts equal
to at least 50 percent of program start-up costs have been
collected under paragraph (1).
(3) Existing resources.--The Commissioner of Social
Security may use funds designated for information technology
modernization to carry out this section, but in all cases
shall be fully reimbursed under paragraph (1)(A).
(4) Annual report.--The Commissioner of Social Security
shall annually submit to the Committee on Ways and Means of
the House of Representatives and the Committee on Finance of
the Senate a report on the amount of indirect costs to the
Social Security Administration arising as a result of the
implementation of this section.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. The bill, as amended, shall be debatable for
1 hour equally divided and controlled by the chair and ranking minority
member of the Committee on Ways and Means.
The gentleman from Florida (Mr. Curbelo) and the gentleman from
Illinois (Mr. Danny K. Davis) each will control 30 minutes.
The Chair recognizes the gentleman from Florida.
General Leave
Mr. CURBELO of Florida. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent that all
Members may have 5 legislative days within which to revise and extend
their remarks and include extraneous material on H.R. 5192, currently
under consideration.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there objection to the request of the
gentleman from Florida?
There was no objection.
Mr. CURBELO of Florida. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I
may consume.
Mr. Speaker, I rise today in strong support of H.R. 5192, the
Protecting Children from Identity Theft Act, and I am grateful that it
is being brought before the House today.
This bill aims to combat synthetic identity fraud by directing the
Social Security Administration to accept electronic signatures when
financial institutions want to verify their customers' information.
Synthetic identity fraud accounts for 80 percent of all credit card
fraud losses today. It has been reported that a record $355 million in
outstanding credit card balances was owed by people who it suspects
didn't exist in 2017, up more than eightfold from 2012.
The Government Accountability Office describes this type of fraud as
involving the creation of a fictitious identity using a combination of
real data, like a Social Security number or date of birth, from
multiple individuals, along with fabricated information.
H.R. 5192 is an important step in reducing fraud, while also ensuring
that the Social Security Administration is able to continue providing
important services and benefits.
The SSA Commissioner is not allowed to begin development of the new
verification system until the Commissioner determines that at least 50
percent of the program's startup costs have been covered by users.
After initial development, users of the verification system are
obligated to pay for the ongoing costs associated with this new
workload by way of advances, reimbursements, user fees, or other
recoveries, as determined by the Commissioner.
My south Florida district is far too familiar with fraudulent
activity affecting the community, and sadly, children and immigrants
are particularly vulnerable to these schemes. Over 1 million children
have their identity stolen annually, and they are 50 times more likely
than adults to be victims of identity theft.
I am proud to partner with Representatives Sinema, Hultgren, and
Marchant on this important effort. I would also like to thank Chairman
Brady and subcommittee Chairman Johnson for their leadership and hard
work, as well as the staff of the Social Security Subcommittee and the
rest of the House Committee on Ways and Means staff who have worked on
this legislation.
I encourage all my colleagues to vote in favor of H.R. 5192, the
Protecting Children from Identity Theft Act, to help modernize identity
protections for our children.
Mr. Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time.
Mr. DANNY K. DAVIS of Illinois. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time
as I may consume.
Mr. Speaker, I am pleased to rise in support of H.R. 5192, the
Protecting Children from Identity Theft Act, which was introduced by
Representatives Carlos Curbelo of Florida and Kyrsten Sinema of
Arizona.
Our Nation is facing a growing epidemic of so-called synthetic
identity theft. This is a sophisticated form of fraud where the
fraudster manufactures a fake identity using a legitimate Social
Security number but combining it with a made-up name. Numbers that
belong to children are especially valuable for these fraudsters. This
is because children typically do not yet have a credit record. If they
did, the credit record would reveal that the name and number do not
match, making the number useless to the synthetic identity fraudster.
Under this bill, banks and other certified users could verify the
customer's name, Social Security number, and date of birth with Social
Security's
[[Page H3379]]
own records. This would allow the bank to detect attempted synthetic
identity theft. As under current law, banks would be required to get
the consent of their customer in order to have the SSA verify
information.
Social Security would not provide any identity information back to
the bank other than, yes, this is a match or, no, this does not match.
This matching could occur more quickly than it does under current law,
to reflect the way commerce is conducted today.
I am pleased that we were able to work in a bipartisan way to develop
this legislation and to strengthen it as it moved through the committee
process. We did so in several ways.
First, we made sure that users of the system paid the full cost of
developing it and conducting the verifications. We did not want to
detract from the main mission of Social Security, which is to make sure
Americans receive their earned Social Security benefits on time and in
full.
Second, we strengthened the security of the system to make it not
subject to misuse. Americans' personal information must be kept secure,
and Social Security must only conduct the matching when the individual
has given consent.
I am pleased to say that Social Security's track record on this is
strong, and I expect they will carry on with their protectiveness of
Americans' private data as they design a new system. I urge my
colleagues to support this bipartisan legislation to protect children
and fight identity theft.
Mr. Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time.
Mr. CURBELO of Florida. Mr. Speaker, it is my pleasure to yield 3
minutes to the gentleman from Texas (Mr. Sam Johnson), the
distinguished chairman of the Social Security Subcommittee.
Mr. SAM JOHNSON of Texas. Mr. Speaker, I thank Mr. Curbelo for
yielding and for introducing this commonsense and much-needed bill.
Mr. Speaker, synthetic identity fraud is a real problem with real
costs to the victims. One million children have their identity stolen
each year, and they deserve to be protected. This legislation will also
help stop criminals from stealing $1 billion a year by ensuring that we
can verify a person is who he or she claims to be when applying for a
credit card.
Synthetic identity fraud is a growing problem. Social Security must
quickly take steps to get this important fraud-fighting tool up and
running. As chairman of the Social Security Subcommittee, I intend to
make sure Social Security doesn't hold this up in any way.
While Social Security will provide this service, the users pay the
full cost so Social Security's budget won't be impacted.
Social Security has an important job: to make sure those who are
eligible get the benefits they deserve. I am committed to doing
everything I can to protect all Americans from identity theft.
H.R. 5192, the Protecting Children from Identity Theft Act, is the
best way to stop synthetic identity fraud, and I urge you all to
support it. The American people deserve nothing less.
Mr. DANNY K. DAVIS of Illinois. Mr. Speaker, I am pleased to yield 5
minutes to the gentlewoman from Arizona (Ms. Sinema), the lead
Democratic cosponsor of this legislation.
{time} 1645
Ms. SINEMA. Mr. Speaker, I rise in support of H.R. 5192, the
Protecting Children from Identity Theft Act.
Mr. Speaker, most of us assume our children are safe from identity
theft. Most children don't have credit cards, and many don't have bank
accounts, so why would they be targeted? Unfortunately, there is a new
type of crime on the rise known as synthetic identity theft. This crime
targets children and accounts for billions of dollars in credit card
fraud.
Synthetic identity theft is happening right now, and it is hurting
real people. In Arizona, a 17-year-old girl discovered she had
accumulated over $275,000 in debt because her Social Security number
was linked to eight scammers and 42 accounts, including mortgages, auto
loans, and credit cards.
To pull off this fraud, criminals obtain a Social Security number
with no prior credit history, and they use it to apply for a credit
card under a fake name. While the first fraudulent credit card
application is usually denied, the failed attempt creates a ``synthetic
identity'' with credit bureaus. This allows thieves to apply for credit
cards, other lines of credit, cell phones, and other activities that
require a credit check. Over time, thieves are able to rack up
mountains of debt and ruin kids' credit before they have a chance to
build their futures.
Every day, Arizona families shouldn't have to worry about their kids
being targets of financial fraud and identity theft. Because financial
criminals constantly use new tricks to steal children's identities, we
must modernize and strengthen ID verification for everyday financial
activities.
Our bill, the Protecting Children from Identity Theft Act, fights
back and gives Arizonans peace of mind. By directing the Social
Security Administration to modernize its ID verification system to
allow for more transactions to be screened and verified, we are taking
a commonsense step to ensure people are who they say they are. Our
commonsense bill closes a key security gap, helping to stop synthetic
identity theft in its tracks.
Thank you to Chairman Brady and special thanks to the gentleman from
Florida (Mr. Curbelo), my friend, for working together to protect our
children and crack down on fraudsters. Arizonans value their privacy,
and they want us to work together to protect it. I am happy to work
across the aisle to bring financial criminals to justice and help
hardworking Arizona families get ahead.
Mr. CURBELO of Florida. Mr. Speaker, first, let me thank my
colleague, Ms. Sinema. It is a pleasure to work with her and to team
up, in a bipartisan manner, to fight fraud and to help the most
vulnerable, in this case, the children. I am very grateful to her, for
all her work on this legislation.
Mr. Speaker, I yield 3 minutes to the gentleman from Illinois (Mr.
Hultgren).
Mr. HULTGREN. Mr. Speaker, I rise today to speak in support of the
Protecting Children from Identity Theft Act.
I would also like to begin by thanking Leader McCarthy and my
colleagues on the Ways and Means Committee, especially Carlos Curbelo,
for his support in bringing this legislation to the House floor.
H.R. 5192 will bring the Social Security Administration into the 21st
century to assist the private sector in combating identity fraud.
Identity theft affects thousands, if not millions, of children and
families a year. A report by Carnegie Mellon CyLab examined more than
40,000 cases of identity theft and found that 10 percent of children in
the study had someone else using their Social Security number. Among
other things, children's identities were used to purchase homes and
open credit card accounts.
According to the information recently published by the Algonquin
Patch, Illinois ranks number seven in the United States for identity
theft. The median loss for fraud is nearly $500. Credit card fraud is
the most common type of fraud.
For example, in Wilmette, Illinois, the Social Security number of a
13-year-old was used by a fraudster to open a credit card with a plan
to use it to pay for plastic surgery. Imagine when these children go to
get their first legitimate extension of credit, maybe a car loan or a
student loan, only to find out that criminals have stolen their
identities and wrecked their financial standing.
The Protecting Children from Identity Theft will strengthen the
relationship between the public and private sectors in order to combat
identity theft. Specifically, it will bring the Social Security
Administration into the 21st century by allowing companies who meet
strict regulatory standards to electronically confirm whether a name,
date of birth, and Social Security number match.
This will make it much easier for companies, such as credit card
issuers, to ensure that they are only providing credit to legitimate
applicants. This will prevent millions of dollars in fraud costs, not
to mention preventing all of the headaches for my constituents whose
identities will be at risk unless this bill is signed into law.
Again, I want to encourage all of my colleagues to vote in support of
the
[[Page H3380]]
Protecting Children from Identity Theft Act.
Mr. DANNY K. DAVIS of Illinois. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time
as I may consume. I have no further requests for time, so I am going to
move ahead and close.
Mr. Speaker, I think we have seen much agreement on the floor today,
pleasantly so. I really don't know when I have seen as much agreement
on a group of bills and legislation as I have seen on this day. And I
guess it really means that all of us agree that we need to do
everything that we can to protect ourselves from identity theft, that
we need to look after the interest of children and protect them.
I want to thank all of the staff from both sides of the aisle, even
those who worked for subcommittees, as well as for the primary staff,
for the tremendous amount of work that they have done.
Again, it is a pleasure working with Mr. Curbelo, and I guess if we
don't agree on everything, we do agree that all of us have a
responsibility to file and pay income taxes in order to keep our
government moving.
It has been a pleasant day, not just for us, but I think all of our
constituents, who have watched the proceedings, probably are saying to
themselves that they would love to see more days like this, and I
would, too. So I urge passage of this bill and the others that we have
had before us.
Mr. Speaker, I yield back the balance of my time.
Mr. CURBELO of Florida. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I
may consume.
Mr. Speaker, I appreciate the comments of my colleague, Mr. Davis,
and I agree with him. This is certainly something to celebrate. The
American people oftentimes see us arguing. It is less often that they
see us collaborating, working together to advance policies that will
improve quality of life in our country.
That is why I want to again urge all of my colleagues to support H.R.
5192, the Protecting Children from Identity Theft Act. We need to do
everything we can to safeguard our communities from these fraud
schemes. This problem has worsened significantly over the past few
years and is leaving families with debt they did not accrue and a
weaker credit history.
H.R. 5192 will help root out synthetic identity fraud through
modernized verification of customer information, and I hope my
colleagues will join me in voting to help protect individuals across
the country from this illegal activity.
Once again, Mr. Speaker, my appreciation to Chairman Brady, to
Ranking Member Neal, to Mr. Davis, to Mr. Hultgren, to Ms. Sinema, and
to everyone who has been a part of making this happen, so that, after
we pass this legislation, children in our country won't have to worry
about having their identities stolen at such a young age.
This kind of fraud can really ruin people's lives, and today, we are
working together, as one united House, Republicans and Democrats, to
fight fraud and to protect children, some of the most vulnerable people
in our society.
Mr. Speaker, I urge a ``yes'' vote, and I yield back the balance of
my time.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. All time for debate has expired.
Pursuant to House Resolution 830, the previous question is ordered on
the bill, as amended.
The question is on the engrossment and third reading of the bill.
The bill was ordered to be engrossed and read a third time, and was
read the third time.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. The question is on the passage of the bill.
The question was taken; and the Speaker pro tempore announced that
the ayes appeared to have it.
Mr. CURBELO of Florida. Mr. Speaker, on that I demand the yeas and
nays.
The yeas and nays were ordered.
The vote was taken by electronic device, and there were--yeas 420,
nays 1, not voting 8, as follows:
[Roll No. 142]
YEAS--420
Abraham
Adams
Aderholt
Aguilar
Allen
Amash
Amodei
Arrington
Babin
Bacon
Banks (IN)
Barletta
Barr
Barragan
Barton
Bass
Beatty
Bera
Bergman
Beyer
Biggs
Bilirakis
Bishop (GA)
Bishop (MI)
Bishop (UT)
Blackburn
Blum
Blumenauer
Blunt Rochester
Bonamici
Bost
Boyle, Brendan F.
Brady (PA)
Brady (TX)
Brat
Brooks (AL)
Brooks (IN)
Brown (MD)
Brownley (CA)
Buchanan
Buck
Bucshon
Budd
Burgess
Bustos
Butterfield
Byrne
Calvert
Capuano
Carbajal
Cardenas
Carson (IN)
Carter (GA)
Carter (TX)
Cartwright
Castor (FL)
Castro (TX)
Chabot
Cheney
Chu, Judy
Cicilline
Clark (MA)
Clarke (NY)
Clay
Cleaver
Clyburn
Coffman
Cohen
Cole
Collins (GA)
Collins (NY)
Comer
Comstock
Conaway
Connolly
Cook
Cooper
Correa
Costa
Costello (PA)
Courtney
Cramer
Crawford
Crist
Crowley
Cuellar
Culberson
Cummings
Curbelo (FL)
Curtis
Davidson
Davis (CA)
Davis, Danny
Davis, Rodney
DeFazio
DeGette
Delaney
DelBene
Demings
Denham
Dent
DeSantis
DeSaulnier
DesJarlais
Deutch
Diaz-Balart
Dingell
Doggett
Donovan
Doyle, Michael F.
Duffy
Duncan (SC)
Duncan (TN)
Dunn
Ellison
Emmer
Engel
Eshoo
Espaillat
Estes (KS)
Esty (CT)
Evans
Faso
Ferguson
Fitzpatrick
Fleischmann
Flores
Fortenberry
Foster
Foxx
Frankel (FL)
Frelinghuysen
Fudge
Gabbard
Gaetz
Gallagher
Gallego
Garamendi
Garrett
Gianforte
Gibbs
Gohmert
Gomez
Gonzalez (TX)
Goodlatte
Gosar
Gottheimer
Gowdy
Granger
Graves (GA)
Graves (LA)
Graves (MO)
Green, Al
Green, Gene
Griffith
Grijalva
Grothman
Guthrie
Gutierrez
Hanabusa
Handel
Harper
Harris
Hartzler
Hastings
Heck
Hensarling
Herrera Beutler
Hice, Jody B.
Higgins (LA)
Higgins (NY)
Hill
Himes
Holding
Hollingsworth
Hoyer
Hudson
Huffman
Huizenga
Hultgren
Hunter
Hurd
Issa
Jackson Lee
Jayapal
Jeffries
Jenkins (KS)
Johnson (GA)
Johnson (LA)
Johnson (OH)
Johnson, E. B.
Johnson, Sam
Jones
Jordan
Joyce (OH)
Kaptur
Katko
Keating
Kelly (IL)
Kelly (MS)
Kelly (PA)
Kennedy
Khanna
Kihuen
Kildee
Kilmer
Kind
King (IA)
King (NY)
Kinzinger
Knight
Krishnamoorthi
Kuster (NH)
Kustoff (TN)
Labrador
LaHood
LaMalfa
Lamb
Lamborn
Lance
Langevin
Larsen (WA)
Larson (CT)
Latta
Lawrence
Lawson (FL)
Lee
Levin
Lewis (GA)
Lewis (MN)
Lieu, Ted
Lipinski
LoBiondo
Loebsack
Lofgren
Long
Loudermilk
Love
Lowenthal
Lowey
Lucas
Luetkemeyer
Lujan Grisham, M.
Lujan, Ben Ray
Lynch
MacArthur
Maloney, Carolyn B.
Maloney, Sean
Marchant
Marino
Marshall
Mast
Matsui
McCarthy
McCaul
McClintock
McCollum
McEachin
McGovern
McHenry
McKinley
McMorris Rodgers
McNerney
McSally
Meadows
Meehan
Meeks
Meng
Messer
Mitchell
Moolenaar
Mooney (WV)
Moore
Moulton
Mullin
Murphy (FL)
Nadler
Napolitano
Neal
Newhouse
Noem
Nolan
Norcross
Norman
Nunes
O'Halleran
O'Rourke
Olson
Palazzo
Pallone
Palmer
Panetta
Pascrell
Paulsen
Payne
Pearce
Pelosi
Perlmutter
Perry
Peters
Peterson
Pingree
Pittenger
Pocan
Poe (TX)
Poliquin
Polis
Posey
Price (NC)
Quigley
Raskin
Ratcliffe
Reed
Reichert
Renacci
Rice (NY)
Rice (SC)
Richmond
Roby
Roe (TN)
Rogers (AL)
Rogers (KY)
Rohrabacher
Rokita
Rooney, Francis
Rooney, Thomas J.
Ros-Lehtinen
Rosen
Roskam
Ross
Rothfus
Rouzer
Roybal-Allard
Royce (CA)
Ruiz
Ruppersberger
Rush
Russell
Rutherford
Ryan (OH)
Sanchez
Sanford
Sarbanes
Schakowsky
Schiff
Schneider
Schrader
Schweikert
Scott (VA)
Scott, Austin
Scott, David
Sensenbrenner
Serrano
Sessions
Sewell (AL)
Shea-Porter
Sherman
Shimkus
Shuster
Simpson
Sinema
Sires
Smith (MO)
Smith (NE)
Smith (NJ)
Smith (TX)
Smucker
Soto
Speier
Stefanik
Stewart
Stivers
Suozzi
Swalwell (CA)
Takano
Taylor
Tenney
Thompson (CA)
Thompson (PA)
Thornberry
Tipton
Titus
Tonko
Torres
Trott
Tsongas
Turner
Upton
Valadao
Vargas
Veasey
Vela
Velazquez
Visclosky
Wagner
Walberg
Walden
Walker
Walorski
Walters, Mimi
Walz
Wasserman Schultz
Waters, Maxine
Watson Coleman
Webster (FL)
Welch
Wenstrup
Westerman
Williams
Wilson (FL)
Wilson (SC)
Wittman
Womack
Woodall
Yarmuth
Yoder
Yoho
Young (AK)
Young (IA)
Zeldin
NAYS--1
Massie
NOT VOTING--8
Black
Bridenstine
DeLauro
Jenkins (WV)
Scalise
Smith (WA)
Thompson (MS)
Weber (TX)
[[Page H3381]]
{time} 1720
Ms. McCOLLUM and Mr. RODNEY DAVIS of Illinois changed their vote from
``nay'' to ``yea.''
So the bill was passed.
The result of the vote was announced as above recorded.
A motion to reconsider was laid on the table.
Stated for:
Mr. SCALISE. Mr. Speaker, I was unavoidably detained. Had I been
present, I would have voted ``yea'' on rollcall No. 142.
____________________