[Congressional Record Volume 164, Number 59 (Thursday, April 12, 2018)]
[Senate]
[Page S2110]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
Nomination of Michael Pompeo
Mr. President, just a short time ago, I was in the hearings regarding
Michael Pompeo to be our Secretary of State. I think my concerns can be
summed up by this: I read to him the two provisions of the War Powers
Act that give the President the power to put our troops in motion on
foreign soil. One of those is a direct and explicit congressional
authorization, and the second is a direct threat or attack on the
United States or our forces or our assets.
I asked him: Do you think the President of the United States can put
forces into action outside of those two provisions, congressional
authorization or a direct attack on America?
He said: Yes.
In other words, he absolutely, 100 percent disavows our Constitution,
which says the power to make war rests in Congress, not at the whim of
the President.
This was one of the most important provisions in the debate about the
design of our Constitution; that it should not be easy to go to war.
The Constitution gives that power explicitly to Congress. Mike Pompeo
says it doesn't matter. It doesn't matter, even if there is not a
threat to the United States, an attack on the United States; it doesn't
matter, even if there is no congressional authorization, the President
can do what he wants. You really can't make that argument and honestly
take an oath of office to abide by the Constitution.
That is why I will adamantly oppose his nomination as Secretary of
State.
Thank you.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The majority leader.
Mr. McCONNELL. Mr. President, I know of no further debate on the
nomination.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Is there any further debate on the nomination?
Hearing no further debate, the question is, Will the Senate advise
and consent to the Wheeler nomination?
Mr. McCONNELL. Mr. President, I ask for the yeas and nays.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Is there a sufficient second?
There appears to be a sufficient second.
The clerk will call the roll.
The bill clerk called the roll.
Mr. CORNYN. The following Senator is necessarily absent: the Senator
from Arizona (Mr. McCain).
Mr. DURBIN. I announce that the Senator from Illinois (Ms. Duckworth)
is necessarily absent.
The PRESIDING OFFICER (Mr. Sullivan). Are there any other Senators in
the Chamber desiring to vote?
The result was announced--yeas 53, nays 45, as follows:
[Rollcall Vote No. 71 Ex.]
YEAS--53
Alexander
Barrasso
Blunt
Boozman
Burr
Capito
Cassidy
Collins
Corker
Cornyn
Cotton
Crapo
Cruz
Daines
Donnelly
Enzi
Ernst
Fischer
Flake
Gardner
Graham
Grassley
Hatch
Heitkamp
Heller
Hoeven
Hyde-Smith
Inhofe
Isakson
Johnson
Kennedy
Lankford
Lee
Manchin
McConnell
Moran
Murkowski
Paul
Perdue
Portman
Risch
Roberts
Rounds
Rubio
Sasse
Scott
Shelby
Sullivan
Thune
Tillis
Toomey
Wicker
Young
NAYS--45
Baldwin
Bennet
Blumenthal
Booker
Brown
Cantwell
Cardin
Carper
Casey
Coons
Cortez Masto
Durbin
Feinstein
Gillibrand
Harris
Hassan
Heinrich
Hirono
Jones
Kaine
King
Klobuchar
Leahy
Markey
McCaskill
Menendez
Merkley
Murphy
Murray
Nelson
Peters
Reed
Sanders
Schatz
Schumer
Shaheen
Smith
Stabenow
Tester
Udall
Van Hollen
Warner
Warren
Whitehouse
Wyden
NOT VOTING--2
Duckworth
McCain
The nomination was confirmed
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The majority leader.
Mr. McCONNELL. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the
further rollcall votes in this series be 10 minutes in length.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Is there objection?
Without objection, it is so ordered.
____________________