[Congressional Record Volume 164, Number 57 (Tuesday, April 10, 2018)]
[Senate]
[Pages S2027-S2028]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
Nominations of John Ring and Patrick Pizzella
Ms. WARREN. Mr. President, I am here today to urge my colleagues to
oppose the confirmation of two Trump nominees--John Ring, who has been
nominated to the National Labor Relations Board, and Patrick Pizzella,
who has been nominated Deputy Secretary of Labor. These two nominees
have been selected to hold critical jobs to protect workers. That is
what these jobs are about.
I will be blunt. I start with a pretty high bar here since, despite
his campaign rhetoric from 2 years ago, the President's track record on
standing up for workers has been absolutely miserable. From the day he
nominated Andrew Puzder--an executive who delighted in mocking and
belittling his own low-wage workers--to run the Department of Labor,
this administration has delivered one gut punch after another to
America's working people.
The National Labor Relations Board is responsible for protecting the
rights of workers to organize and bargain for better wages and
benefits, so as we consider President Trump's latest nominee for the
Board, it makes sense to look at what his nominees so far have already
done.
Look at the new Republican majority's very first week back on the job
back in December. In just 5 days, the Board mowed its way through a
giant wish list of areas where giant companies were begging to be let
off the hook for violating workers' rights.
Allowing employers to shirk their collective bargaining obligations
by contracting out workers? Check.
Making it easier for employers to control the outcome of union
elections. Check.
Opening the door for workplace rules that chill workers' ability to
join together on the job. Check.
Allowing cases to be ``settled'' without input from the workers whose
rights are affected by the settlement. Check.
Just as troubling as these anti-worker decisions themselves are the
egregious conflicts of interest behind them.
From the moment he was nominated by President Trump, I have
repeatedly raised concerns about Board Member William Emanuel's history
of representing big corporations that have abused their workers and
about his mile-long list of potential conflicts of interest. Sure
enough, after just a few months on the Board, NLRB's inspector general
determined that Mr. Emanuel participated in not one but two important
decisions involving his former law firm, which directly violated his
ethics pledge. In response, the Board vacated one of its most
consequential decisions of the last year, and Member Emanuel lost any
remaining credibility that he could be an impartial Board member. So I
called on him to resign.
Now the President wants us to put John Ring on the Board. I have
asked Mr. Ring to provide a list of clients and cases that might
require his recusal. To his credit, he has done so. But Mr. Ring's long
list of clients is a huge red flag. Either he will ignore the ethics
rules when they are inconvenient--like Mr. Emanuel did--or he will
likely have to recuse himself from important cases.
A large number of potential conflicts of interest isn't the only
thing Mr. Ring has in common with Mr. Emanuel. Like Emanuel, Mr. Ring
has also spent his career representing large employers against workers,
and his few public statements on the NLRB express a belief that the
Board has been too friendly to workers and that corporations have
gotten the short end of the stick.
After decades of stagnant wages and skyrocketing corporate profits,
does
[[Page S2028]]
anyone other than insider lobbyists and lawyers think that Washington
is working for middle-class families and that big corporations are the
ones under attack? I don't think so. That is exactly why an NLRB that
looks out for workers is more important than ever. President Trump's
NLRB is failing miserably at that mission.
Working Americans deserve Board members with a demonstrated record of
fighting for workers, not against them. They deserve Board members who
aren't ethically and legally constrained from doing the job. Mr. Ring
does not meet those qualifications.
Workers need an NLRB that works for them, and they need leaders at
the Department of Labor who are going to be on their side, not on the
side of giant employers and extreme, rightwing donors. Patrick Pizzella
has been nominated to the No. 2 job at the Department of Labor, and
nothing in Mr. Pizzella's resume tells us that he meets the description
of being on the side of workers.
In the 1990s, Mr. Pizzella lobbied with Jack Abramoff to exempt the
Northern Mariana Islands from Federal labor laws. Do you know what that
did? That allowed companies to run sweatshops while slapping ``Made in
America'' labels on their products.
Later, when Mr. Pizzella was in charge of data management and other
operations at the Labor Department, the Government Accountability
Office found that the Wage and Hour Division was egregiously
mishandling wage theft complaints, consistently leaving vulnerable low-
wage workers out to dry, because of faulty data systems and other
operational failures.
After leaving the Department, Mr. Pizzella went to work for
secretive, far-right donor groups, such as the Conservative Action
Project, which secretly planned out the 2013 government shutdown to
sabotage the Affordable Care Act and undermine many workers' access to
healthcare, all while Mr. Pizzella was its highest paid employee.
The Deputy Secretary position should be filled by someone who has
defended worker rights, not undermined them, someone who will make
government work for the American people, not hamstring it for political
purposes. Mr. Pizzella is the wrong man for this job.
President Trump talked a big game during his campaign about fighting
for workers, but after a year of corporate tax cuts and rolling back
commonsense protections for workplace safety, retirement security, and
more, we know that those promises have turned out not to be worth much
of anything.
The Senate should send a clear message to this administration that we
expect agencies like the NLRB and the Labor Department to stand up for
working people, not to suck up to corporate lobbyists. Rejecting these
two nominees would be a good first step.
Thank you, Mr. President.
I yield the floor.
The PRESIDING OFFICER (Mr. Cruz). Under the previous order, all time
has expired.
The question is, Will the Senate advise and consent to the Boom
nomination?
Mr. INHOFE. Mr. President, I ask for the yeas and nays.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Is there a sufficient second?
There appears to be a sufficient second.
The clerk will call the roll.
The bill clerk called the roll.
Mr. CORNYN. The following Senator is necessarily absent: the Senator
from Arizona (Mr. McCain).
Mr. DURBIN. I announce that the Senator from New Jersey (Mr. Booker)
and the Senator from Illinois (Ms. Duckworth) are necessarily absent.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Are there any other Senators in the Chamber
desiring to vote?
The result was announced--yeas 96, nays 1, as follows:
[Rollcall Vote No. 65 Ex.]
YEAS--96
Alexander
Baldwin
Barrasso
Bennet
Blumenthal
Blunt
Boozman
Brown
Burr
Cantwell
Capito
Cardin
Carper
Casey
Cassidy
Collins
Coons
Corker
Cornyn
Cortez Masto
Cotton
Crapo
Cruz
Daines
Donnelly
Durbin
Enzi
Ernst
Feinstein
Fischer
Flake
Gardner
Gillibrand
Graham
Grassley
Harris
Hassan
Hatch
Heinrich
Heitkamp
Heller
Hirono
Hoeven
Hyde-Smith
Inhofe
Isakson
Johnson
Jones
Kaine
Kennedy
King
Klobuchar
Lankford
Leahy
Lee
Manchin
Markey
McCaskill
McConnell
Menendez
Merkley
Moran
Murkowski
Murphy
Murray
Nelson
Paul
Perdue
Peters
Portman
Reed
Risch
Roberts
Rounds
Rubio
Sasse
Schatz
Schumer
Scott
Shaheen
Shelby
Smith
Stabenow
Sullivan
Tester
Thune
Tillis
Toomey
Udall
Van Hollen
Warner
Warren
Whitehouse
Wicker
Wyden
Young
NAYS--1
Sanders
NOT VOTING--3
Booker
Duckworth
McCain
The nomination was confirmed.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Under the previous order, the motion to
reconsider is considered made and laid upon the table and the President
will be immediately notified of the Senate's action.
____________________