[Congressional Record Volume 164, Number 57 (Tuesday, April 10, 2018)]
[Senate]
[Pages S2024-S2025]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
Seizure of Information
Mr. SCHUMER. Mr. President, yesterday FBI agents, at the direction of
the U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York, seized
information from President Trump's personal attorney, Michael Cohen. It
was reported that the referral to the U.S. attorney's office originated
with Special Counsel Mueller, but the raid itself was under the
direction of the U.S. attorney's office and New York FBI agents.
We don't know the reason for Special Counsel Mueller's referral. We
do know that any referral must have been signed off by Deputy Attorney
General Rod Rosenstein. Furthermore, the U.S. attorney's office in New
York would have to be convinced that whatever information Mr. Mueller
passed along was worth pursuing, and the U.S. attorney would have to
convince an independent magistrate or judge--nonpartisan--that there
was probable cause to believe that seizing information from Mr. Cohen
would yield evidence of a crime. That is a serious and high standard
that had to be met.
I go through these details because it is important to understand that
yesterday's events could only have been the result of a rigorous legal
process, with checks every step of the way and with a very high burden
of proof. Yet, last night, President Trump said the FBI raid was a
``disgrace,'' part of a ``witch hunt,'' an ``attack on our country,''
and mentioned that many people have encouraged him to fire Mr. Mueller.
``We'll see what happens,'' he concluded.
Let's break this down. The President suggests that the latest events
are part of the partisan conspiracy against him. I remind the President
that the source of the referral, Special Counsel Mueller, is a lifelong
Republican. The Deputy Attorney General who signed off on the referral,
Rod Rosenstein, is a Republican, appointed by President Trump. The
Attorney General, Jeff Sessions, is a Republican, appointed by
President Trump. The U.S. attorney for the Southern District in New
York, who sought a search warrant based on that information, is a
Republican, appointed by President Trump. The agents in New York who
carried out the seizure are under the direction of Christopher Wray, a
Republican, appointed by President Trump.
If President Trump believes this to be a partisan conspiracy, he once
again ignores the fact that every major player is a Republican, and all
but the judges are appointed by President Trump himself. The partisan
affiliation of those involved really doesn't matter. These are all law
enforcement officers simply doing their job--a job enshrined by the
Constitution of the United States.
The President also tweeted this morning that ``attorney-client
privilege is dead.''
Mr. President, attorney-client privilege is alive and well, but there
is an exception when the attorney might be involved in a crime or
fraud. It is well known as the crime-fraud exception. That exception is
obviously in play today. Law enforcement officers believe there is a
good chance that the attorney for the President committed a crime or
was involved in fraud or they couldn't have gotten the OK from the
magistrate to make these seizures.
President Trump also said, the implication of his personal attorney
for potentially serious Federal crimes constitutes an ``attack on our
country.'' That is what he said, an ``attack on our country.''
With due respect, President Trump, America has been around for over
two and a half centuries. An investigation of your personal attorney is
not an attack on our country. The Japanese bombing Pearl Harbor was an
attack on our country; 9/11 was an attack on our country. When Russia
interfered with our elections, that was an attack on our country.
Investigating your personal lawyer, with a high standard to be met, is
certainly not an attack on our country. It is what America has always
been about and still is--the rule of law.
President Trump said the raid was a ``disgrace.'' I say to the
President: Mr. President, you have it wrong. Interfering with the
investigation would be a disgrace. Calling it an attack on our
[[Page S2025]]
country is a disgrace. What matters is the rule of law. In this
country, no man is above the law, not even the President. Mr.
President, your comments were the disgrace.
If the President is thinking of using this raid to fire Special
Counsel Mueller or otherwise interfere with the chain of command in the
Russia probe, we have one simple message for him: Don't even think
about it.
Special Counsel Mueller has uncovered a deep and detailed pattern of
Russian interference in our elections. It has led to several
indictments and guilty pleas. It has also led the Trump administration
itself to level sanctions against Russian individuals for meddling in
our elections. That is proof positive that Mueller's investigation is
not a so-called witch hunt.
If the President's own administration has leveled sanctions against
Russian individuals for meddling in our elections, how can the
President say it is a witch hunt? It is being pursued by his own
administration, independent of the Mueller investigation. The
investigation by Special Counsel Mueller is critical to the health of
our democracy and the security of future elections. It must--it must--
be allowed to continue.
The President seems to have a view that the Department of Justice's
sole purpose is to protect the President and go after his enemies. I
emphatically state to the President, that is not the role of the
Department of Justice. Their role is to enforce the law and go after
anyone who breaks it. That is their role, and it is not subject to the
President's political interests in any way.
President Trump should not have any contact--any contact--with the
new U.S. attorney in the Southern District, with his office, or the
Department of Justice officials overseeing an investigation of Mr.
Cohen. Any attempted contact by the President or the White House should
be reported to the Department of Justice immediately.
One final point. When President Trump implies that the Mueller
investigation is an assault on our country and our values, he is not
only dead wrong, he is wrong in a very dangerous way. Special Counsel
Mueller, the FBI, Federal prosecutors, and U.S. attorneys are following
the due process of our legal system. Calling that an attack on our
country undermines the rule of law--a bedrock principle of this great
Nation for centuries, the reason, above all, the rest of the world
looks up to these great United States of America.
The only person engaging in an attack on American values, what we all
stand for--the rule of law--is, unfortunately, President Trump. It
needs to stop. It is gnawing at the core of America.
It is difficult to know when you are living through a historic time
in this country. Our Nation has prevailed through many dark times. We
all hope that, in the sweep of history, our current moment is not one
of peril, but we have witnessed a sustained attack by the President of
the United States on the rule of law in this country, and we may be
getting to that point.
We have seen that any institution with the power to check the
President's power--the Federal Judiciary, the Department of Justice,
the FBI, the Congress, the press--suffers his disdain and derision. If
we fail to defend these institutions, which represent the rule of law,
the Constitution, and the balance of power in our country the Founding
Fathers so brilliantly enshrined, then we are letting our grand
democracy diminish.
I beseech my colleagues on both sides of the aisle to stand up and
say what the President is doing is wrong. Make it clear that firing
Mueller or interfering in his investigation crosses a redline and is a
threat to our constitutional order. Let us also be clear that the
President does not have the authority to order the special counsel's
firing without cause.
Finally, let us take steps to protect the special counsel from
political interference. We have several bipartisan bills designed to do
just that. Majority Leader McConnell should bring them to the floor and
let us debate them very soon.
For months, Republicans have said that legislation to protect the
special counsel is not needed because they have been assured by
nameless people that the President will not fire the special counsel.
That assurance has been shaken by the President's comments last night.
By his own words, it is clear the President may--may--be considering
firing the special counsel. This Congress must respond forcefully, and
on a bipartisan basis, by reaffirming our belief that the President
cannot fire the special counsel without cause and by passing
legislation to ensure that any attempts to remove Robert Mueller will
be unsuccessful.
We should not abide the President's attempted assault on the rule of
law in America. The eyes of history are upon us.
I yield the floor.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The majority whip.