[Congressional Record Volume 164, Number 43 (Monday, March 12, 2018)]
[Senate]
[Page S1632]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
By Mr. DURBIN (for himself, Mr. Kennedy, Mr. Grassley, and Mrs.
Feinstein):
S. 2535. A bill to amend the Controlled Substances Act to strengthen
Drug Enforcement Administration discretion in setting opioid quotas; to
the Committee on the Judiciary.
Mr. DURBIN. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the text of
the bill be printed in the Record.
There being no objection, the text of the bill was ordered to be
printed in the Record, as follows:
S. 2535
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of
the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ``Opioid Quota Reform Act''.
SEC. 2. STRENGTHENING CONSIDERATIONS FOR DEA OPIOID QUOTAS.
Section 306 of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C.
826) is amended--
(1) in the last sentence of subsection (a), by striking ``
and not in terms of individual pharmaceutical dosage forms
prepared from or containing such a controlled substance'';
and
(2) by adding at the end the following:
``(i)(1) In fixing and adjusting production and
manufacturing quotas under this section for fentanyl,
oxycodone, hydrocodone, oxymorphone, and hydromorphone, the
Attorney General shall consider the impact of the production
and manufacturing quotas on overall public health and rates
of diversion, abuse, and overdose deaths related to these
controlled substances in the United States. Any of the
considerations in this subsection or in subsection (a) may be
used to determine changes to levels of such production and
manufacturing quotas in a given year.
``(2)(A) For any year in which the approved production
quota for fentanyl, oxycodone, hydrocodone, oxymorphone, or
hydromorphone is higher than the approved production quota
for the substance in the previous year, the Attorney General
shall include in its final order an explanation of why the
public health benefits of increasing such quota outweigh the
consequences of having an increased volume of such substance
available for sale, and potential diversion, in the United
States.
``(B) Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of
this subsection and every year thereafter, the Attorney
General shall provide to the Caucus on International
Narcotics Control, Committee on the Judiciary, Committee on
Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions, and Committee on
Appropriations of the Senate and the Committee on the
Judiciary, Committee on Energy and Commerce, and Committee on
Appropriations of the House of Representatives, the following
information with regard to each of the substances described
in subparagraph (A):
``(i) An anonymized count of the total number of
manufacturers issued individual manufacturing quotas that
year for that substance.
``(ii) A count of how many such manufacturers were issued
an approved manufacturing quota that was higher than the
quota issued to that manufacturer for that substance in the
previous year.
``(3) Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment
of this subsection, the Attorney General shall submit to
Congress a report on how the Attorney General will ensure
that the annual process of fixing and adjusting production
and manufacturing quotas under this section takes into
consideration--
``(A) efforts to reduce the costs, injuries, and deaths
associated with the diversion and abuse of prescription
opioids and heroin, including changes in the accepted medical
use of certain controlled substances; and
``(B) data collection and evaluation of the volume of
controlled substances that are diverted and collected from
approved drug collection receptacles, mail-back programs, and
take-back events.''.
______