[Congressional Record Volume 164, Number 40 (Wednesday, March 7, 2018)]
[Senate]
[Pages S1454-S1460]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]





          STATEMENTS ON INTRODUCED BILLS AND JOINT RESOLUTIONS

      By Mr. BARRASSO:
  S. 2507. A bill to require short-term limited duration insurance 
issuers to renew or continue in force such coverage at the option of 
the enrollees; to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and 
Pensions.
  Mr. BARRASSO. Mr. President, over the next couple of weeks, Congress 
is going to need to finalize government appropriations for the 
remainder of this year. Among the things that some people are talking 
about is including money for a couple of ObamaCare programs. One of 
them is money for the so-called cost-sharing reduction payments. 
Funding for these payments was never appropriated by Congress. The 
Obama administration paid the insurance companies anyway. President 
Trump stopped these illegal payments last October. Now, some people in 
Congress are talking about funding them again.
  We all know that ObamaCare has been a disaster for millions and 
millions of families all across the country. We know that for the 
people who live in States that use the Federal healthcare.gov exchange, 
average premiums have doubled since the law took effect. Certainly 
Wyoming is one of those States that experienced it; I heard about it in 
Clark County just last week. We know it. We hear about it in letters 
from the people who write to us. No matter where they are from in the 
State of Wyoming, we continue to hear about the costs going up. I am 
sure there is a similar situation in the State of Arkansas, the 
Presiding Officer's State, as well.
  According to Gallup, the number of uninsured people actually 
increased last year by 3 million. Many people are finding that they 
just can't afford to have ObamaCare insurance. It is especially hard 
for hard-working families who don't qualify for subsidies under the 
healthcare law. So we know there is a problem, and we know we have to 
do something to help people who are struggling in ObamaCare markets.
  If people are going to discuss using this government spending law to 
spend more money on the collapsing ObamaCare markets, there are other 
things we should be discussing as well. We should discuss finding a 
real solution to rising healthcare costs--one that doesn't just 
continue the unworkable, unaffordable, and, frankly, unfair system that 
ObamaCare created. We should discuss actually giving people more 
freedom and more flexibility to choose a healthcare plan that is right 
for them.
  I am introducing a bill today to do just that. My legislation will 
build on a step that President Trump and the Trump administration took 
last month. The administration reversed a last-minute Obama-era policy 
that had all but killed short-term health plans. These are less 
expensive health plans that are free from the expensive and intrusive 
and burdensome regulations that ObamaCare placed on other insurers, so 
they are a much more affordable option for many Americans who have been 
priced out of ObamaCare.
  President Trump is on the right path with this new rule. It is 
absolutely the right decision. He is giving people back an option so 
they can decide for themselves if it is a right choice for them. I 
think we should go a step further, and that is why I am introducing 
this legislation. We should go a step further in the omnibus spending 
bill. We should make this more affordable choice permanent. Making it 
permanent protects people. It protects people so a future 
administration doesn't do what President Obama did and try to wipe out 
choices for Americans.

  This legislation I am introducing today gives people a choice to have 
these plans for not just 90 days--which was allowed at the end of the 
Obama administration--but for a full 364 days. So it is up to a year.
  It also makes sure people can then renew these plans, if they want 
to, so it can become their permanent insurance, free from the mandates 
of the Obama healthcare law. It protects them from being dropped if 
they are sick. Remember, that was one of the biggest promises of 
ObamaCare that was broken. President Obama said: If you like your plan, 
you can keep your plan. Almost immediately, people found out it wasn't 
true at all. In fact, it was called by some of the press the ``Lie of 
the Year.''
  In 2013 alone, there were 4.7 million Americans who got letters from 
their insurance companies telling them that their insurance plan had 
been canceled. Under my proposal, people with these short-term plans 
wouldn't have to worry about getting a cancellation letter. They would 
be protected from their insurance company, and they would be protected 
from Washington, DC.
  States are much better suited than Washington to regulate their 
insurance markets in ways that work best for the citizens of their 
State. These simple changes in my legislation will help give people 
back--help give to them--the freedom ObamaCare took away. That is what 
we are looking at, the need for freedom for the American people. We can 
essentially give people an escape hatch to get out of the ObamaCare 
plan entirely. We can give them the freedom to choose the coverage that 
works for them and works best for their families.
  That is the right way to bring down healthcare costs for Americans: 
Give them options, give them choices, give them freedom, not make them 
buy a one-size-fits-all government plan.
  People living in more than half of America's counties have only one 
choice of insurance in the ObamaCare exchange--only one--half of the 
counties in the country. It is not a choice. They don't have options. 
It is a monopoly.
  The left-leaning Urban Institute estimates that 4.2 million Americans 
would enroll in short-term plans next year if we just let them keep 
their plan as long as a year. That is the kind of pent-up demand that 
is out there for these more affordable, more flexible plans with much 
more freedom.
  Just the one change could make a difference in the lives of 4 million 
Americans. My legislation does just that, and it has other benefits as 
well.
  I think it would be an attractive option for many more Americans, but 
a lot of Democrats in Washington don't want to talk about options. No. 
They know ObamaCare markets are collapsing; they don't seem to care. 
They know costs are soaring out of control; it doesn't seem to concern 
as many as it should. They know middle-class families are being 
squeezed the hardest by these rising ObamaCare premiums. Their answer? 
We have heard it. We have heard it on the floor of the Senate: Try to 
push everyone--everyone in America, want it or not, everyone in 
America--into a single, government-run insurance plan that looks a lot 
like Medicaid. That is exactly the opposite of what we should be doing 
and what I am proposing today.
  What the Democrats are proposing is more of the same failed idea that 
caused Americans so many problems under ObamaCare: government control.
  If there is going to be talk of propping up the ObamaCare markets 
during the omnibus spending bill, then we should also be talking about 
helping people get out of the ObamaCare markets. Give them the freedom, 
give them the escape hatch.
  We should protect people who want health insurance but who don't want 
ObamaCare health insurance. They know what works best for them and 
their families, and we should trust the American people to know what is 
best for them and their families. We should give people the freedom and 
the flexibility to make those decisions for themselves, and we should 
give them more opportunities to escape from the disastrous, 
destructive, and extremely expensive ObamaCare markets.
                                 ______
                                 
      By Mr. ALEXANDER (for himself, Mrs. Capito, Mr. Daines, Mr. 
        Gardner, Mr. Heinrich, Mr. King, Mr. Manchin, and Mr. Tillis):
  S. 2509. A bill to establish the National Park Restoration Fund, and 
for other purposes; to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
  Mr. ALEXANDER. Mr. President, probably every single one of us in the 
Senate would agree that it is hard to get here, it is hard to stay 
here, and it is wonderful to be able to accomplish something worthwhile 
while you are here. That is why I am here today--because I want to call 
attention to an announcement that was made this morning by a bipartisan 
group of U.S. Senators and the Secretary of the Interior, Ryan Zinke, 
which could take away

[[Page S1455]]

the $11.6 billion of national park maintenance backlog in the 417 
national parks that we have. The proposal we made this morning could 
eliminate that backlog over the next 10 years.
  I want to give Secretary Zinke and the President a lot of credit for 
this because they have agreed to do something that no other President 
and no other Secretary of the Interior have ever agreed to do, as far 
as I know, and that is to allow us to use revenues from energy 
development on Federal lands as mandatory spending to pay for the 
maintenance backlog in our National Park System.
  Ken Burns called our national parks ``America's Best Idea.'' I would 
say that the best idea to support America's best idea is the proposal 
that Secretary Zinke has made to take care of the maintenance backlog 
in our national parks.
  Half of that maintenance backlog is our roads. Of course, when we pay 
for the roads this way, that means all the money that is now being 
taken away from all the other purposes at our national parks--I am 
talking about the National Mall, where I get up in the morning and walk 
every day, or the Great Smoky Mountains National Park, where I walk 
when I go home on the weekends--could be used for other purposes there, 
in all 417 of those parks.
  If we don't do this, we will never catch up because this backlog--
this $11.6 billion backlog--is four times the annual appropriations for 
the National Park Service. Everyone who cares about our national 
parks--and that should be almost every American--should welcome this 
proposal.
  As I said, our use of Federal dollars in this way is unprecedented, 
but the principle is not unprecedented. The principle is a very simple 
principle, and that is this: If we create an environmental burden, 
which energy exploration does, whether it is wind turbines or whether 
it is spreading solar panels all over hundreds and hundreds of acres or 
whether it is oil and gas exploration. If we create an environmental 
burden, we should create a corresponding environmental benefit. That 
principle is well established in our laws and has been supported by 
almost every major environmental and conservation group I know of.
  Let's start with the 1962 Outdoor Recreation Resources Review 
Commission that Laurance Rockefeller chaired. That Commission, which 
took a look at America for the next generation to see what we should do 
to protect the outdoors so we could all enjoy it, recommended, and the 
Congress adopted, the idea of the Land and Water Conservation Fund. 
There was a Federal side and a State side. Over all of the years since 
1964, $18 billion has been spent in the Land and Water Conservation 
Fund. That is the environmental benefit. Where did the money come from? 
It came from drilling on Federal offshore properties.
  In 1986, I chaired President Reagan's Commission on Americans 
Outdoors. We reaffirmed our support for the idea that an environmental 
burden means we should have an environmental benefit. We urged Congress 
to make permanent the funding for the Land and Water Conservation Fund. 
So we reaffirmed that again for the next generation.
  Then, in 2006, with the leadership of Senator Domenici, Senator 
Bingaman, and others--many of us worked on it--Congress decided we 
would take some of the revenues from new drilling in the Gulf of Mexico 
and apply those to the State side of the Land and Water Conservation 
Fund--again, an environmental burden and a corresponding environmental 
benefit.
  That is why this proposal is so exciting to me. That is why this 
proposal has such strong bipartisan support.
  In the Senate, the supporters include Senator King of Maine, Senator 
Daines of Montana, and Senator Heinrich of New Mexico. It is a 
bipartisan group. Supporters also include Senator Capito and Senator 
Manchin, Senator Gardner and Senator Tillis; all of us support and are 
cosponsoring this legislation we are introducing today.
  In the House of Representatives, we also have two cosponsors. 
Congressman Mike Simpson of Idaho, who is chairman of the House Energy 
and Water Development Subcommittee, and Congressman Kurt Schrader from 
Oregon is also a cosponsor in the House of Representatives.
  So I believe this is an unprecedented day; for all of those who care 
about and love our national parks and who have struggled to imagine how 
we can deal with this $11.6 billion maintenance backlog--a backlog that 
is four times the annual appropriation--we can pay this all off with 
this proposal, which is supported by the President and his Office of 
Management and Budget, a bipartisan group of Senators, and a bipartisan 
group in the House.
  I look forward to working with Senator Murkowski and Senator Cantwell 
in the Energy and Natural Resources Committee. Hopefully, it can be 
moved promptly through that committee. There are other important things 
we would like to do, but I can't think of anything much more important 
than our National Park System.
  I mentioned a little earlier that we have 417 national parks in the 
country. I grew up camping and hiking in one of those, and I live 
within 2 miles of that park. It is the Great Smoky Mountains National 
Park. It has more visitors than any other national park--nearly twice 
as many as the closest one. Eleven million people a year come to the 
park.
  Many of my best memories are from that park. I remember, when I was 
15 years old, my dad dropped me and a couple of other boys at the 
highest point of the park, Clingmans Dome, one day around 
Christmastime. There was 3 feet of snow. He said: I will pick you up in 
Gatlinburg. Well, he did, and that was about 8 or 9 hours later.
  Later that same year in the summertime we were camping on Spence 
Field. That is at about 5,000 or 6,000 feet as well. We had taken 
blueberry pancake mix up there. We picked the blueberries. We had all 
of the materials for a good breakfast, but we made one mistake. We left 
the breakfast in our packs in the tent, and during the night a bear 
crawled in there with us, took it out, and we ended up on top of the 
trail shelter banging the pans together trying to run the bear off. 
That was the last time we left our breakfast materials nearby the 
sleeping area when we were camping in the park.
  The park is a good place for lessons and learning and appreciating 
beauty. It is a good place for the rich. It is a good place for the 
poor. Parents bring their children out of a digital diet to feast on a 
world of natural splendor. We learn our history in a place where 
history comes alive; not just the history of the world but the history 
of East Tennessee, the history of Wyoming, the history of Maine, the 
history of Montana.
  Let me give my colleagues a sense of just what this $11 billion 
backlog means. I have already said it is nearly four times what the 
National Park Service receives in annual appropriations. We can talk 
about the Smokies alone. Between Tennessee and North Carolina, there is 
about a $215 million backlog of projects; 75 percent of that is roads. 
We get nearly twice as many visitors as any other park. These visitors 
come to see our majestic views. They spend 400,000 nights camping in 9 
frontcountry campgrounds and 100 backcountry camp sites.
  In 2013, the park had to close Look Rock Campground and the picnic 
area due to funding shortfalls in replacing the water treatment 
facilities. In order to open this recreation area for visitors, the 
park needs $3 million to replace the water treatment facility, repair 
the road infrastructure, and replace aging picnic tables and campground 
pads. This proposal could do that.
  The funding provided in the National Park Restoration Act, which is 
what we call our legislation, could help reopen this campground for the 
enjoyment of the over 11 million visitors to the Smokies.
  The Smokies also supports a vast trail system, with almost 850 miles 
of maintained trails for hikers, backpackers, and visitors. The current 
deferred maintenance backlog for trails in the Smokies is $18.5 
million. This proposal would take care of that.
  In August 2017, I visited the Smokies with Interior Secretary Ryan 
Zinke, and I saw firsthand with him the work that is needed on the 
trails. We hiked the Rainbow Falls Trail, where a 2-year project is 
underway to rehabilitate the trail.
  Crews from Trails Forever, a partnership between the Great Smoky 
Mountains National Park and the Friends of

[[Page S1456]]

the Smokies, and the American Conservation Experience are working to 
build a rock staircase along the trail to reduce erosion and improve 
visitor safety and enjoyment.
  Crews use rigging systems to move large rocks, split them using 
drills and chisels, and then set them into place to provide long-
lasting trail structures for those hoping to see the rainbow formed by 
mist from the 80-foot waterfall along the Rainbow Falls Trail.
  Secretary Zinke and I worked to split and place one of those rock 
steps. It is not very easy to do. Volunteer crews will work to 
rehabilitate over 6 miles of that trail.
  In addition to the crews, every Wednesday volunteers head up the 
trail to help restore it for future visitors. In 2017, volunteers 
donated 900 hours of work on that trail.
  The Smokies is full of wonderful volunteers like those working on the 
Rainbow Falls Trail. Over 2,800 volunteers donated over 115,000 hours 
last year alone, but we must do more to get the funding to our parks to 
help address the maintenance needs and support the countless 
volunteers.
  In the Smokies, 75 percent of that maintenance work is roads, which 
isn't surprising, since millions of visitors to the park each year 
experience it behind the wheel. The park maintains and operates nearly 
400 miles of roads, including 6 tunnels and 146 bridges, which allow 
visitors to traverse the park's mountainous landscape.
  The Smokies is working hard to address these maintenance needs, and 
later this year they will open 16 miles of the Foothills Parkway. We 
are all looking forward to that in East Tennessee. Driving the 
Foothills Parkway will give you a spectacular view of the highest 
mountains in the Eastern United States. Tennesseans are excited that 
these new 16 miles of the parkway will soon be open to the public. It 
is scheduled for this fall.
  Due to funding shortfalls, building and repairing the 16-mile stretch 
of the Foothills Parkway took over 50 years and will be completed 
nearly 75 years after Congress first authorized the Foothills Parkway. 
Completing just 1.6 miles of the parkway took nearly 30 years.
  In 1944, Congress authorized the Foothills Parkway but prohibited 
Federal funds from being used to purchase and acquire the land, so the 
State of Tennessee purchased the land and gave it to the Federal 
Government to create a scenic parkway to provide views of the Great 
Smoky Mountains National Park.
  For 75 years, Tennesseans and visitors have been waiting to enjoy the 
majestic views of the Foothills Parkway because there hasn't been 
sufficient Federal funding to address the maintenance needs of our 
national parks. Other roadways in the Smokies, including Newfound Gap 
Road and Clingmans Dome Road, remain on this backlog list.
  Clingmans Dome Road takes visitors to Clingmans Dome--the highest 
point in Tennessee and the third highest mountain east of the 
Mississippi. At 6,643 feet, Clingmans Dome offers panoramic views of 
the Smoky Mountains.
  Additional funding is desperately needed for the Smokies and all of 
our National Parks to help repair and rebuild campgrounds, trails, and 
roads. Doing that will bring more visitors, more tourists, and more 
jobs to Tennessee and to national park communities throughout our 
country.
  According to the Outdoor Industry Association, the outdoor recreation 
economy generates 7.6 million direct jobs and $887 billion in consumer 
spending. In Tennessee, the outdoor recreation economy generates 
188,000 direct jobs and over $21 billion in consumer spending.
  In 2016, the visitors to the Great Smoky Mountains National Park 
alone spent nearly $950 million in communities surrounding the park. 
The over 11 million visitors to the park supported nearly 15,000 jobs 
and $1.3 billion in economic output in these communities.
  Restoring our parks not only helps to preserve our land for 
generations but helps to grow our economy.
  Now, here is what our bill does. I see the Senator from North 
Carolina is coming to preside, and he is one of the principal 
cosponsors of the bill. The National Park Restoration Act will use 
revenues from energy production on Federal lands to help pay for the 
$11 billion maintenance backlog at our national parks. It will provide 
mandatory funding on top of annual appropriations for the National Park 
Service--for the priority-deferred maintenance needs that support 
critical infrastructure and visitor services at our parks.
  The National Park Restoration Fund created by the legislation will 
receive 50 percent of revenues from energy production on Federal lands 
over the 2018 projections that are not already allocated to other 
purposes.
  This legislation includes revenues from all sources of energy 
production on Federal land: oil, gas, coal, renewables, and alternative 
energy.
  The legislation protects all existing obligations for revenues from 
energy production on Federal land, including payments to States, 
payments to the Land and Water Conservation Fund, and payments to the 
Reclamation Fund.
  Finally, I want to acknowledge the work that Senators Portman and 
Warner have done. They have introduced similar legislation. They have 
many of the same objectives. I know there are many other Senators who 
care deeply about this issue, other than the bipartisan group of us who 
introduced the legislation today. We can all work together in the 
Energy and Natural Resources Committee where this bill will be 
referred. We will put our heads together with Senator Murkowski and 
Senator Cantwell. We will come out with the best possible bill--
something that President Trump can continue to support and that the 
full Senate and then the House of Representatives can pass. Then, we 
can get on with it and begin to deal with the deferred maintenance 
backlog in our national parks.
  Theodore Roosevelt once said that nothing short of defending this 
country in wartime ``compares in importance with the great central task 
of leaving this land even a better land for our descendants than it is 
for us.'' We must all work together to restore our national treasures 
so future generations have the same opportunity to enjoy them, as we 
have.
  In conclusion, let me reiterate something personal about this. In 
1985, the Secretary of the Interior called and asked me, when I was 
Governor of Tennessee, to chair the President's Commission on Americans 
Outdoors. I did that, along with Gil Grosvenor, the chairman of the 
National Geographic Society, and a variety of people. One of our major 
recommendations was to pick up the recommendation of the Rockefeller 
Commission from 1964, which said, if there is an environmental burden, 
there should be an environmental benefit. They are the ones who 
recommended, to begin with, that we take land from energy exploration 
and use it to pay for the Land and Water Conservation Fund.
  We reaffirmed that in 1986. We reaffirmed that principle in 2006 when 
we used revenues from drilling for the State side of the Land and Water 
Conservation Fund.
  So while this proposal is unprecedented in the sense that it is the 
first time that I know of that a President and his Office of Management 
and Budget have approved mandatory funding using revenues from energy 
production on Federal lands to deal with national park maintenance 
needs, the principle of matching an environmental burden with an 
environmental benefit is well established.
  I am grateful to the President, and I am especially grateful to 
Secretary Zinke for his initiative. I look forward to working with a 
bipartisan group of Senators in the Energy Committee to develop a bill, 
pass it, and get started on the work of America's best idea for 
restoring America's best idea--our National Park System.
                                 ______
                                 
      By Mr. DURBIN (for himself, Mr. Whitehouse, and Mr. Brown):
  S. 2518. A bill to amend title 11, United States Code, to improve 
protections for employees and retirees in business bankruptcies; to the 
Committee on the Judiciary.
  Mr. DURBIN. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the text of 
the bill be printed in the Record.
  There being no objection, the text of the bill was ordered to be 
printed in the Record, as follows:

                                S. 2518

       Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 
     the United States of America in Congress assembled,

[[Page S1457]]

  


     SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE; TABLE OF CONTENTS.

       (a) Short Title.--This Act may be cited as the ``Protecting 
     Employees and Retirees in Business Bankruptcies Act of 
     2018''.
       (b) Table of Contents.--The table of contents of this Act 
     is as follows:

Sec. 1. Short title; table of contents.
Sec. 2. Findings.

        TITLE I--IMPROVING RECOVERIES FOR EMPLOYEES AND RETIREES

Sec. 101. Increased wage priority.
Sec. 102. Claim for stock value losses in defined contribution plans.
Sec. 103. Priority for severance pay.
Sec. 104. Financial returns for employees and retirees.
Sec. 105. Priority for WARN Act damages.

           TITLE II--REDUCING EMPLOYEES' AND RETIREES' LOSSES

Sec. 201. Rejection of collective bargaining agreements.
Sec. 202. Payment of insurance benefits to retired employees.
Sec. 203. Protection of employee benefits in a sale of assets.
Sec. 204. Claim for pension losses.
Sec. 205. Payments by secured lender.
Sec. 206. Preservation of jobs and benefits.
Sec. 207. Termination of exclusivity.
Sec. 208. Claim for withdrawal liability.

         TITLE III--RESTRICTING EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PROGRAMS

Sec. 301. Executive compensation upon exit from bankruptcy.
Sec. 302. Limitations on executive compensation enhancements.
Sec. 303. Assumption of executive benefit plans.
Sec. 304. Recovery of executive compensation.
Sec. 305. Preferential compensation transfer.

                       TITLE IV--OTHER PROVISIONS

Sec. 401. Union proof of claim.
Sec. 402. Exception from automatic stay.

     SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

       The Congress finds the following:
       (1) Business bankruptcies have increased sharply in recent 
     years and remain at high levels. These bankruptcies include 
     several of the largest business bankruptcy filings in 
     history. As the use of bankruptcy has expanded, job 
     preservation and retirement security are placed at greater 
     risk.
       (2) Laws enacted to improve recoveries for employees and 
     retirees and limit their losses in bankruptcy cases have not 
     kept pace with the increasing and broader use of bankruptcy 
     by businesses in all sectors of the economy. However, while 
     protections for employees and retirees in bankruptcy cases 
     have eroded, management compensation plans devised for those 
     in charge of troubled businesses have become more prevalent 
     and are escaping adequate scrutiny.
       (3) Changes in the law regarding these matters are urgently 
     needed as bankruptcy is used to address increasingly more 
     complex and diverse conditions affecting troubled businesses 
     and industries.

        TITLE I--IMPROVING RECOVERIES FOR EMPLOYEES AND RETIREES

     SEC. 101. INCREASED WAGE PRIORITY.

       Section 507(a) of title 11, United States Code, is 
     amended--
       (1) in paragraph (4)--
       (A) by striking ``$10,000'' and inserting ``$20,000'';
       (B) by striking ``within 180 days''; and
       (C) by striking ``or the date of the cessation of the 
     debtor's business, whichever occurs first,'';
       (2) in paragraph (5)--
       (A) in subparagraph (A)--
       (i) by striking ``within 180 days''; and
       (ii) by striking ``or the date of the cessation of the 
     debtor's business, whichever occurs first''; and
       (B) by striking subparagraph (B) and inserting the 
     following:
       ``(B) for each such plan, to the extent of the number of 
     employees covered by each such plan, multiplied by 
     $20,000.''.

     SEC. 102. CLAIM FOR STOCK VALUE LOSSES IN DEFINED 
                   CONTRIBUTION PLANS.

       Section 101(5) of title 11, United States Code, is 
     amended--
       (1) in subparagraph (A), by striking ``or'' at the end;
       (2) in subparagraph (B), by striking the period at the end 
     and inserting ``; or''; and
       (3) by adding at the end the following:
       ``(C) right or interest in equity securities of the debtor, 
     or an affiliate of the debtor, if--
       ``(i) the equity securities are held in a defined 
     contribution plan (within the meaning of section 3(34) of the 
     Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (29 U.S.C. 
     1002(34))) for the benefit of an individual who is not an 
     insider, a senior executive officer, or any of the 20 next 
     most highly compensated employees of the debtor (if 1 or more 
     are not insiders);
       ``(ii) the equity securities were attributable to either 
     employer contributions by the debtor or an affiliate of the 
     debtor, or elective deferrals (within the meaning of section 
     402(g) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986), and any 
     earnings thereon; and
       ``(iii) an employer or plan sponsor who has commenced a 
     case under this title has committed fraud with respect to 
     such plan or has otherwise breached a duty to the participant 
     that has proximately caused the loss of value.''.

     SEC. 103. PRIORITY FOR SEVERANCE PAY.

       Section 503(b) of title 11, United States Code, is 
     amended--
       (1) in paragraph (8)(B), by striking ``and'' at the end;
       (2) in paragraph (9), by striking the period and inserting 
     a semicolon; and
       (3) by adding at the end the following:
       ``(10) severance pay owed to employees of the debtor (other 
     than to an insider, other senior management, or a consultant 
     retained to provide services to the debtor), under a plan, 
     program, or policy generally applicable to employees of the 
     debtor (but not under an individual contract of employment), 
     or owed pursuant to a collective bargaining agreement, for 
     layoff or termination on or after the date of the filing of 
     the petition, which pay shall be deemed earned in full upon 
     such layoff or termination of employment; and''.

     SEC. 104. FINANCIAL RETURNS FOR EMPLOYEES AND RETIREES.

       Section 1129(a) of title 11, United States Code is 
     amended--
       (1) by striking paragraph (13) and inserting the following:
       ``(13) With respect to retiree benefits, as that term is 
     defined in section 1114(a), the plan--
       ``(A) provides for the continuation after the effective 
     date of the plan of payment of all retiree benefits at the 
     level established pursuant to subsection (e)(1)(B) or (g) of 
     section 1114 at any time before the date of confirmation of 
     the plan, for the duration of the period for which the debtor 
     has obligated itself to provide such benefits, or if no 
     modifications are made before confirmation of the plan, the 
     continuation of all such retiree benefits maintained or 
     established in whole or in part by the debtor before the date 
     of the filing of the petition; and
       ``(B) provides for recovery of claims arising from the 
     modification of retiree benefits or for other financial 
     returns, as negotiated by the debtor and the authorized 
     representative (to the extent that such returns are paid 
     under, rather than outside of, a plan).''; and
       (2) by adding at the end the following:
       ``(17) The plan provides for recovery of damages payable 
     for the rejection of a collective bargaining agreement, or 
     for other financial returns as negotiated by the debtor and 
     the authorized representative under section 1113 (to the 
     extent that such returns are paid under, rather than outside 
     of, a plan).''.

     SEC. 105. PRIORITY FOR WARN ACT DAMAGES.

       Section 503(b)(1)(A)(ii) of title 11, United States Code is 
     amended to read as follows:
       ``(ii) wages and benefits awarded pursuant to a judicial 
     proceeding or a proceeding of the National Labor Relations 
     Board as back pay or damages attributable to any period of 
     time occurring after the date of commencement of the case 
     under this title, as a result of a violation of Federal or 
     State law by the debtor, without regard to the time of the 
     occurrence of unlawful conduct on which the award is based or 
     to whether any services were rendered on or after the 
     commencement of the case, including an award by a court under 
     section 5 of the Worker Adjustment and Retraining 
     Notification Act (29 U.S.C. 2104) of up to 60 days' pay and 
     benefits following a layoff that occurred or commenced at a 
     time when such award period includes a period on or after the 
     commencement of the case, if the court determines that 
     payment of wages and benefits by reason of the operation of 
     this clause will not substantially increase the probability 
     of layoff or termination of current employees or of 
     nonpayment of domestic support obligations during the case 
     under this title;''.

           TITLE II--REDUCING EMPLOYEES' AND RETIREES' LOSSES

     SEC. 201. REJECTION OF COLLECTIVE BARGAINING AGREEMENTS.

       Section 1113 of title 11, United States Code, is amended by 
     striking subsections (a) through (f) and inserting the 
     following:
       ``(a) The debtor in possession, or the trustee if one has 
     been appointed under this chapter, other than a trustee in a 
     case covered by subchapter IV of this chapter and by title I 
     of the Railway Labor Act (45 U.S.C. 151 et seq.), may reject 
     a collective bargaining agreement only in accordance with 
     this section. In this section, a reference to the trustee 
     includes the debtor in possession.
       ``(b) No provision of this title shall be construed to 
     permit the trustee to unilaterally terminate or alter any 
     provision of a collective bargaining agreement before 
     complying with this section. The trustee shall timely pay all 
     monetary obligations arising under the terms of the 
     collective bargaining agreement. Any such payment required to 
     be made before a plan confirmed under section 1129 is 
     effective has the status of an allowed administrative expense 
     under section 503.
       ``(c)(1) If the trustee seeks modification of a collective 
     bargaining agreement, the trustee shall provide notice to the 
     labor organization representing the employees covered by the 
     collective bargaining agreement that modifications are being 
     proposed under this section, and shall promptly provide an 
     initial proposal for modifications to the collective 
     bargaining agreement. Thereafter, the trustee shall confer in 
     good faith with the labor organization, at reasonable times 
     and for a reasonable period in light of the complexity of the 
     case, in attempting to reach mutually acceptable 
     modifications of the collective bargaining agreement.
       ``(2) The initial proposal and subsequent proposals by the 
     trustee for modification of a collective bargaining agreement 
     shall be based upon a business plan for the reorganization of 
     the debtor, and shall reflect the most complete and reliable 
     information available. The trustee shall provide to the

[[Page S1458]]

     labor organization all information that is relevant for 
     negotiations. The court may enter a protective order to 
     prevent the disclosure of information if disclosure could 
     compromise the position of the debtor with respect to the 
     competitors in the industry of the debtor, subject to the 
     needs of the labor organization to evaluate the proposals of 
     the trustee and any application for rejection of the 
     collective bargaining agreement or for interim relief 
     pursuant to this section.
       ``(3) In consideration of Federal policy encouraging the 
     practice and process of collective bargaining and in 
     recognition of the bargained-for expectations of the 
     employees covered by the collective bargaining agreement, 
     modifications proposed by the trustee--
       ``(A) shall be proposed only as part of a program of 
     workforce and nonworkforce cost savings devised for the 
     reorganization of the debtor, including savings in management 
     personnel costs;
       ``(B) shall be limited to modifications designed to achieve 
     a specified aggregate financial contribution for the 
     employees covered by the collective bargaining agreement 
     (taking into consideration any labor cost savings negotiated 
     within the 12-month period before the filing of the 
     petition), and shall be not more than the minimum savings 
     essential to permit the debtor to exit bankruptcy, such that 
     confirmation of a plan of reorganization is not likely to be 
     followed by the liquidation, or the need for further 
     financial reorganization, of the debtor (or any successor to 
     the debtor) in the short term; and
       ``(C) shall not be disproportionate or overly burden the 
     employees covered by the collective bargaining agreement, 
     either in the amount of the cost savings sought from such 
     employees or the nature of the modifications.
       ``(d)(1) If, after a period of negotiations, the trustee 
     and the labor organization have not reached an agreement over 
     mutually satisfactory modifications, and further negotiations 
     are not likely to produce mutually satisfactory 
     modifications, the trustee may file a motion seeking 
     rejection of the collective bargaining agreement after notice 
     and a hearing. Absent agreement of the parties, no such 
     hearing shall be held before the expiration of the 21-day 
     period beginning on the date on which notice of the hearing 
     is provided to the labor organization representing the 
     employees covered by the collective bargaining agreement. 
     Only the debtor and the labor organization may appear and be 
     heard at such hearing. An application for rejection shall 
     seek rejection effective upon the entry of an order granting 
     the relief.
       ``(2) In consideration of Federal policy encouraging the 
     practice and process of collective bargaining and in 
     recognition of the bargained-for expectations of the 
     employees covered by the collective bargaining agreement, the 
     court may grant a motion seeking rejection of a collective 
     bargaining agreement only if, based on clear and convincing 
     evidence--
       ``(A) the court finds that the trustee has complied with 
     the requirements of subsection (c);
       ``(B) the court has considered alternative proposals by the 
     labor organization and has concluded that such proposals do 
     not meet the requirements of subsection (c)(3)(B);
       ``(C) the court finds that further negotiations regarding 
     the proposal of the trustee or an alternative proposal by the 
     labor organization are not likely to produce an agreement;
       ``(D) the court finds that implementation of the proposal 
     of the trustee shall not--
       ``(i) cause a material diminution in the purchasing power 
     of the employees covered by the collective bargaining 
     agreement;
       ``(ii) adversely affect the ability of the debtor to retain 
     an experienced and qualified workforce; or
       ``(iii) impair the labor relations of the debtor such that 
     the ability to achieve a feasible reorganization would be 
     compromised; and
       ``(E) the court concludes that rejection of the collective 
     bargaining agreement and immediate implementation of the 
     proposal of the trustee is essential to permit the debtor to 
     exit bankruptcy, such that confirmation of a plan of 
     reorganization is not likely to be followed by liquidation, 
     or the need for further financial reorganization, of the 
     debtor (or any successor to the debtor) in the short term.
       ``(3) If the trustee has implemented a program of incentive 
     pay, bonuses, or other financial returns for insiders, senior 
     executive officers, or the 20 next most highly compensated 
     employees or consultants providing services to the debtor 
     during the bankruptcy, or such a program was implemented 
     within 180 days before the date of the filing of the 
     petition, the court shall presume that the trustee has failed 
     to satisfy the requirements of subsection (c)(3)(C).
       ``(4) In no case shall the court enter an order rejecting a 
     collective bargaining agreement that would result in 
     modifications to a level lower than the level proposed by the 
     trustee in the proposal found by the court to have complied 
     with the requirements of this section.
       ``(5) At any time after the date on which an order 
     rejecting a collective bargaining agreement is entered, or in 
     the case of a collective bargaining agreement entered into 
     between the trustee and the labor organization providing 
     mutually satisfactory modifications, at any time after that 
     collective bargaining agreement has been entered into, the 
     labor organization may apply to the court for an order 
     seeking an increase in the level of wages or benefits, or 
     relief from working conditions, based upon changed 
     circumstances. The court shall grant the request only if the 
     increase or other relief is not inconsistent with the 
     standard set forth in paragraph (2)(E).
       ``(e) During a period during which a collective bargaining 
     agreement at issue under this section continues in effect, 
     and if essential to the continuation of the business of the 
     debtor or in order to avoid irreparable damage to the estate, 
     the court, after notice and a hearing, may authorize the 
     trustee to implement interim changes in the terms, 
     conditions, wages, benefits, or work rules provided by the 
     collective bargaining agreement. Any hearing under this 
     subsection shall be scheduled in accordance with the needs of 
     the trustee. The implementation of such interim changes shall 
     not render the application for rejection moot.
       ``(f)(1) Rejection of a collective bargaining agreement 
     constitutes a breach of the collective bargaining agreement, 
     and shall be effective no earlier than the entry of an order 
     granting such relief.
       ``(2) Notwithstanding paragraph (1), solely for purposes of 
     determining and allowing a claim arising from the rejection 
     of a collective bargaining agreement, rejection shall be 
     treated as rejection of an executory contract under section 
     365(g) and shall be allowed or disallowed in accordance with 
     section 502(g)(1). No claim for rejection damages shall be 
     limited by section 502(b)(7). Economic self-help by a labor 
     organization shall be permitted upon a court order granting a 
     motion to reject a collective bargaining agreement under 
     subsection (d) or pursuant to subsection (e), and no 
     provision of this title or of any other provision of Federal 
     or State law may be construed to the contrary.
       ``(g) The trustee shall provide for the reasonable fees and 
     costs incurred by a labor organization under this section, 
     upon request and after notice and a hearing.
       ``(h) A collective bargaining agreement that is assumed 
     shall be assumed in accordance with section 365.''.

     SEC. 202. PAYMENT OF INSURANCE BENEFITS TO RETIRED EMPLOYEES.

       Section 1114 of title 11, United States Code, is amended--
       (1) in subsection (a), by inserting ``, without regard to 
     whether the debtor asserts a right to unilaterally modify 
     such payments under such plan, fund, or program'' before the 
     period at the end;
       (2) in subsection (b)(2), by inserting ``, and a labor 
     organization serving as the authorized representative under 
     subsection (c)(1),'' after ``section'';
       (3) by striking subsection (f) and inserting the following:
       ``(f)(1) If a trustee seeks modification of retiree 
     benefits, the trustee shall provide a notice to the 
     authorized representative that modifications are being 
     proposed pursuant to this section, and shall promptly provide 
     an initial proposal. Thereafter, the trustee shall confer in 
     good faith with the authorized representative at reasonable 
     times and for a reasonable period in light of the complexity 
     of the case in attempting to reach mutually satisfactory 
     modifications.
       ``(2) The initial proposal and subsequent proposals by the 
     trustee shall be based upon a business plan for the 
     reorganization of the debtor and shall reflect the most 
     complete and reliable information available. The trustee 
     shall provide to the authorized representative all 
     information that is relevant for the negotiations. The court 
     may enter a protective order to prevent the disclosure of 
     information if disclosure could compromise the position of 
     the debtor with respect to the competitors in the industry of 
     the debtor, subject to the needs of the authorized 
     representative to evaluate the proposals of the trustee and 
     an application pursuant to subsection (g) or (h).
       ``(3) Modifications proposed by the trustee--
       ``(A) shall be proposed only as part of a program of 
     workforce and nonworkforce cost savings devised for the 
     reorganization of the debtor, including savings in management 
     personnel costs;
       ``(B) shall be limited to modifications that are designed 
     to achieve a specified aggregate financial contribution for 
     the retiree group represented by the authorized 
     representative (taking into consideration any cost savings 
     implemented within the 12-month period before the date of 
     filing of the petition with respect to the retiree group), 
     and shall be no more than the minimum savings essential to 
     permit the debtor to exit bankruptcy, such that confirmation 
     of a plan of reorganization is not likely to be followed by 
     the liquidation, or the need for further financial 
     reorganization, of the debtor (or any successor to the 
     debtor) in the short term; and
       ``(C) shall not be disproportionate or overly burden the 
     retiree group, either in the amount of the cost savings 
     sought from such group or the nature of the modifications.'';
       (4) in subsection (g)--
       (A) by striking the subsection designation and all that 
     follows through the semicolon at the end of paragraph (3) and 
     inserting the following:
       ``(g)(1) If, after a period of negotiations, the trustee 
     and the authorized representative have not reached agreement 
     over mutually satisfactory modifications and further 
     negotiations are not likely to produce mutually satisfactory 
     modifications, the trustee may file a motion seeking 
     modifications in the payment of retiree benefits after notice 
     and a hearing. Absent agreement of the parties, no such 
     hearing shall be held before the

[[Page S1459]]

     expiration of the 21-day period beginning on the date on 
     which notice of the hearing is provided to the authorized 
     representative. Only the debtor and the authorized 
     representative may appear and be heard at such hearing.
       ``(2) The court may grant a motion to modify the payment of 
     retiree benefits only if, based on clear and convincing 
     evidence--
       ``(A) the court finds that the trustee has complied with 
     the requirements of subsection (f);
       ``(B) the court has considered alternative proposals by the 
     authorized representative and has determined that such 
     proposals do not meet the requirements of subsection 
     (f)(3)(B);
       ``(C) the court finds that further negotiations regarding 
     the proposal of the trustee or an alternative proposal by the 
     authorized representative are not likely to produce a 
     mutually satisfactory agreement;
       ``(D) the court finds that implementation of the proposal 
     shall not cause irreparable harm to the affected retirees; 
     and
       ``(E) the court concludes that an order granting the motion 
     and immediate implementation of the proposal of the trustee 
     is essential to permit the debtor to exit bankruptcy, such 
     that confirmation of a plan of reorganization is not likely 
     to be followed by liquidation, or the need for further 
     financial reorganization, of the debtor (or a successor to 
     the debtor) in the short term.
       ``(3) If a trustee has implemented a program of incentive 
     pay, bonuses, or other financial returns for insiders, senior 
     executive officers, or the 20 next most highly compensated 
     employees or consultants providing services to the debtor 
     during the bankruptcy, or such a program was implemented 
     within 180 days before the date of the filing of the 
     petition, the court shall presume that the trustee has failed 
     to satisfy the requirements of subparagraph (f)(3)(C).''; and
       (B) in the matter following paragraph (3)--
       (i) by striking ``except that in no case'' and inserting 
     the following:
       ``(4) In no case''; and
       (ii) by striking ``is consistent with the standard set 
     forth in paragraph (3)'' and inserting ``assures that all 
     creditors, the debtor, and all of the affected parties are 
     treated fairly and equitably, and is clearly favored by the 
     balance of the equities''; and
       (5) by striking subsection (k) and redesignating 
     subsections (l) and (m) as subsections (k) and (l), 
     respectively.

     SEC. 203. PROTECTION OF EMPLOYEE BENEFITS IN A SALE OF 
                   ASSETS.

       Section 363(b) of title 11, United States Code, is amended 
     by adding at the end the following:
       ``(3) In approving a sale under this subsection, the court 
     shall consider the extent to which a bidder has offered to 
     maintain existing jobs, preserve terms and conditions of 
     employment, and assume or match pension and retiree health 
     benefit obligations in determining whether an offer 
     constitutes the highest or best offer for such property.''.

     SEC. 204. CLAIM FOR PENSION LOSSES.

       Section 502 of title 11, United States Code, is amended by 
     adding at the end the following:
       ``(l) The court shall allow a claim asserted by an active 
     or retired participant, or by a labor organization 
     representing such participants, in a defined benefit plan 
     terminated under section 4041 or 4042 of the Employee 
     Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (29 U.S.C. 1341, 
     1342), for any shortfall in pension benefits accrued as of 
     the effective date of the termination of such pension plan as 
     a result of the termination of the plan and limitations upon 
     the payment of benefits imposed pursuant to section 4022 of 
     that Act (29 U.S.C. 1342), notwithstanding any claim asserted 
     and collected by the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation 
     with respect to such termination.
       ``(m) The court shall allow a claim of a kind described in 
     section 101(5)(C) by an active or retired participant in a 
     defined contribution plan (within the meaning of section 
     3(34) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 
     (29 U.S.C. 1002(34))), or by a labor organization 
     representing such participants. The amount of such claim 
     shall be measured by the market value of the stock at the 
     time of contribution to, or purchase by, the plan and the 
     value as of the commencement of the case.''.

     SEC. 205. PAYMENTS BY SECURED LENDER.

       Section 506(c) of title 11, United States Code, is amended 
     by adding at the end the following: ``If employees have not 
     received wages, accrued vacation, severance, or other 
     benefits owed under the policies and practices of the debtor, 
     or pursuant to the terms of a collective bargaining 
     agreement, for services rendered on and after the date of the 
     commencement of the case, such unpaid obligations shall be 
     deemed necessary costs and expenses of preserving, or 
     disposing of, property securing an allowed secured claim and 
     shall be recovered even if the trustee has otherwise waived 
     the provisions of this subsection under an agreement with the 
     holder of the allowed secured claim or a successor or 
     predecessor in interest.''.

     SEC. 206. PRESERVATION OF JOBS AND BENEFITS.

       Chapter 11 of title 11, United States Code, is amended--
       (1) by inserting before section 1101 the following:

     ``Sec. 1100. Statement of purpose

       ``A debtor commencing a case under this chapter shall have 
     as its principal purpose the reorganization of its business 
     to preserve going concern value to the maximum extent 
     possible through the productive use of its assets and the 
     preservation of jobs that will sustain productive economic 
     activity.'';
       (2) in section 1129--
       (A) in subsection (a), as amended by section 104, by adding 
     at the end the following:
       ``(18) The debtor has demonstrated that the reorganization 
     preserves going concern value to the maximum extent possible 
     through the productive use of the assets of the debtor and 
     preserves jobs that sustain productive economic activity.''; 
     and
       (B) in subsection (c)--
       (i) by inserting ``(1)'' after ``(c)''; and
       (ii) by striking the last sentence and inserting the 
     following:
       ``(2) If the requirements of subsections (a) and (b) are 
     met with respect to more than 1 plan, the court shall, in 
     determining which plan to confirm--
       ``(A) consider the extent to which each plan would preserve 
     going concern value through the productive use of the assets 
     of the debtor and the preservation of jobs that sustain 
     productive economic activity; and
       ``(B) confirm the plan that better serves such interests.
       ``(3) A plan that incorporates the terms of a settlement 
     with a labor organization representing employees of the 
     debtor shall presumptively constitute the plan that satisfies 
     this subsection.''; and
       (3) in the table of sections, by inserting before the item 
     relating to section 1101 the following:

``1100. Statement of purpose.''.

     SEC. 207. TERMINATION OF EXCLUSIVITY.

       Section 1121(d) of title 11, United States Code, is amended 
     by adding at the end the following:
       ``(3) For purposes of this subsection, cause for reducing 
     the 120-day period or the 180-day period includes--
       ``(A) the filing of a motion pursuant to section 1113 
     seeking rejection of a collective bargaining agreement if a 
     plan based upon an alternative proposal by the labor 
     organization is reasonably likely to be confirmed within a 
     reasonable time; and
       ``(B) the proposed filing of a plan by a proponent other 
     than the debtor, which incorporates the terms of a settlement 
     with a labor organization if such plan is reasonably likely 
     to be confirmed within a reasonable time.''.

     SEC. 208. CLAIM FOR WITHDRAWAL LIABILITY.

       Section 503(b) of title 11, United States Code, as amended 
     by section 103 of this Act, is amended by adding at the end 
     the following:
       ``(11) with respect to withdrawal liability owed to a 
     multiemployer pension plan for a complete or partial 
     withdrawal pursuant to section 4201 of the Employee 
     Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (29 U.S.C. 1381) where 
     such withdrawal occurs on or after the commencement of the 
     case, an amount equal to the amount of vested benefits 
     payable from such pension plan that accrued as a result of 
     employees' services rendered to the debtor during the period 
     beginning on the date of commencement of the case and ending 
     on the date of the withdrawal from the plan.''.

         TITLE III--RESTRICTING EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PROGRAMS

     SEC. 301. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION UPON EXIT FROM BANKRUPTCY.

       Section 1129(a) of title 11, United States Code, is 
     amended--
       (1) in paragraph (4), by adding at the end the following: 
     ``Except for compensation subject to review under paragraph 
     (5), payments or other distributions under the plan to or for 
     the benefit of insiders, senior executive officers, and any 
     of the 20 next most highly compensated employees or 
     consultants providing services to the debtor, shall not be 
     approved except as part of a program of payments or 
     distributions generally applicable to employees of the 
     debtor, and only to the extent that the court determines that 
     such payments are not excessive or disproportionate compared 
     to distributions to the nonmanagement workforce of the 
     debtor.''; and
       (2) in paragraph (5)--
       (A) in subparagraph (A)(ii), by striking ``and'' at the 
     end;
       (B) in subparagraph (B), by striking the period at the end 
     and inserting ``; and''; and
       (C) by adding at the end the following:
       ``(C) the compensation disclosed pursuant to subparagraph 
     (B) has been approved by, or is subject to the approval of, 
     the court as--
       ``(i) reasonable when compared to individuals holding 
     comparable positions at comparable companies in the same 
     industry; and
       ``(ii) not disproportionate in light of economic 
     concessions by the nonmanagement workforce of the debtor 
     during the case.''.

     SEC. 302. LIMITATIONS ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION ENHANCEMENTS.

       Section 503(c) of title 11, United States Code, is 
     amended--
       (1) in paragraph (1), in the matter preceding subparagraph 
     (A)--
       (A) by inserting ``, a senior executive officer, or any of 
     the 20 next most highly compensated employees or 
     consultants'' after ``an insider'';
       (B) by inserting ``or for the payment of performance or 
     incentive compensation, or a bonus of any kind, or other 
     financial returns designed to replace or enhance incentive, 
     stock, or other compensation in effect before the date of the 
     commencement of the case,'' after ``remain with the debtor's 
     business,''; and
       (C) by inserting ``clear and convincing'' before ``evidence 
     in the record''; and

[[Page S1460]]

       (2) by amending paragraph (3) to read as follows:
       ``(3) other transfers or obligations to or for the benefit 
     of insiders, senior executive officers, managers, or 
     consultants providing services to the debtor, in the absence 
     of a finding by the court, based upon clear and convincing 
     evidence, and without deference to the request of the debtor 
     for such payments, that such transfers or obligations are 
     essential to the survival of the business of the debtor or 
     (in the case of a liquidation of some or all of the assets of 
     the debtor) essential to the orderly liquidation and 
     maximization of value of the assets of the debtor, in either 
     case, because of the essential nature of the services 
     provided, and then only to the extent that the court finds 
     such transfers or obligations are reasonable compared to 
     individuals holding comparable positions at comparable 
     companies in the same industry and not disproportionate in 
     light of economic concessions by the nonmanagement workforce 
     of the debtor during the case.''.

     SEC. 303. ASSUMPTION OF EXECUTIVE BENEFIT PLANS.

       Section 365 of title 11, United States Code, is amended--
       (1) in subsection (a), by striking ``and (d)'' and 
     inserting ``(d), (q), and (r)''; and
       (2) by adding at the end the following:
       ``(q) No deferred compensation arrangement for the benefit 
     of insiders, senior executive officers, or any of the 20 next 
     most highly compensated employees of the debtor shall be 
     assumed if a defined benefit plan for employees of the debtor 
     has been terminated pursuant to section 4041 or 4042 of the 
     Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (29 U.S.C. 
     1341, 1342), on or after the date of the commencement of the 
     case or within 180 days before the date of the commencement 
     of the case.
       ``(r) No plan, fund, program, or contract to provide 
     retiree benefits for insiders, senior executive officers, or 
     any of the 20 next most highly compensated employees of the 
     debtor shall be assumed if the debtor has obtained relief 
     under subsection (g) or (h) of section 1114 to impose 
     reductions in retiree benefits or under subsection (d) or (e) 
     of section 1113 to impose reductions in the health benefits 
     of active employees of the debtor, or reduced or eliminated 
     health benefits for active or retired employees within 180 
     days before the date of the commencement of the case.''.

     SEC. 304. RECOVERY OF EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.

       (a) In General.--Subchapter III of chapter 5 of title 11, 
     United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 562 
     the following:

     ``Sec. 563. Recovery of executive compensation

       ``(a) If a debtor has obtained relief under section 1113(d) 
     or section 1114(g), by which the debtor reduces the cost of 
     its obligations under a collective bargaining agreement or a 
     plan, fund, or program for retiree benefits (as defined in 
     section 1114(a)), the court, in granting relief, shall 
     determine the percentage diminution in the value of the 
     obligations when compared to the obligations of the debtor 
     under the collective bargaining agreement, or with respect to 
     retiree benefits, as of the date of the commencement of the 
     case under this title before granting such relief. In making 
     its determination, the court shall include reductions in 
     benefits, if any, as a result of the termination pursuant to 
     section 4041 or 4042 of the Employee Retirement Income 
     Security Act of 1974 (29 U.S.C. 1341, 1342), of a defined 
     benefit plan administered by the debtor, or for which the 
     debtor is a contributing employer, effective at any time on 
     or after 180 days before the date of the commencement of a 
     case under this title. The court shall not take into account 
     pension benefits paid or payable under that Act as a result 
     of any such termination.
       ``(b) If a defined benefit pension plan administered by the 
     debtor, or for which the debtor is a contributing employer, 
     has been terminated pursuant to section 4041 or 4042 of the 
     Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (29 U.S.C. 
     1341, 1342), effective at any time on or after 180 days 
     before the date of the commencement of a case under this 
     title, but a debtor has not obtained relief under section 
     1113(d), or section 1114(g), the court, upon motion of a 
     party in interest, shall determine the percentage diminution 
     in the value of benefit obligations when compared to the 
     total benefit liabilities before such termination. The court 
     shall not take into account pension benefits paid or payable 
     under title IV of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act 
     of 1974 (29 U.S.C. 1301 et seq.) as a result of any such 
     termination.
       ``(c) Upon the determination of the percentage diminution 
     in value under subsection (a) or (b), the estate shall have a 
     claim for the return of the same percentage of the 
     compensation paid, directly or indirectly (including any 
     transfer to a self-settled trust or similar device, or to a 
     nonqualified deferred compensation plan under section 
     409A(d)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986) to any 
     officer of the debtor serving as member of the board of 
     directors of the debtor within the year before the date of 
     the commencement of the case, and any individual serving as 
     chairman or lead director of the board of directors at the 
     time of the granting of relief under section 1113 or 1114 or, 
     if no such relief has been granted, the termination of the 
     defined benefit plan.
       ``(d) The trustee or a committee appointed pursuant to 
     section 1102 may commence an action to recover such claims, 
     except that if neither the trustee nor such committee 
     commences an action to recover such claim by the first date 
     set for the hearing on the confirmation of plan under section 
     1129, any party in interest may apply to the court for 
     authority to recover such claim for the benefit of the 
     estate. The costs of recovery shall be borne by the estate.
       ``(e) The court shall not award postpetition compensation 
     under section 503(c) or otherwise to any person subject to 
     subsection (c) of this section if there is a reasonable 
     likelihood that such compensation is intended to reimburse or 
     replace compensation recovered by the estate under this 
     section.''.
       (b) Technical and Conforming Amendment.--The table of 
     sections for chapter 5 of title 11, United States Code, is 
     amended by inserting after the item relating to section 562 
     the following:

``563. Recovery of executive compensation.''.

     SEC. 305. PREFERENTIAL COMPENSATION TRANSFER.

       Section 547 of title 11, United States Code, is amended by 
     adding at the end the following:
       ``(j)(1) The trustee may avoid a transfer--
       ``(A) made--
       ``(i) to or for the benefit of an insider (including an 
     obligation incurred for the benefit of an insider under an 
     employment contract) made in anticipation of bankruptcy; or
       ``(ii) in anticipation of bankruptcy to a consultant who is 
     formerly an insider and who is retained to provide services 
     to an entity that becomes a debtor (including an obligation 
     under a contract to provide services to such entity or to a 
     debtor); and
       ``(B) made or incurred on or within 1 year before the 
     filing of the petition.
       ``(2) No provision of subsection (c) shall constitute a 
     defense against the recovery of a transfer described in 
     paragraph (1).
       ``(3) The trustee or a committee appointed pursuant to 
     section 1102 may commence an action to recover a transfer 
     described in paragraph (1), except that, if neither the 
     trustee nor such committee commences an action to recover the 
     transfer by the time of the commencement of a hearing on the 
     confirmation of a plan under section 1129, any party in 
     interest may apply to the court for authority to recover the 
     claims for the benefit of the estate. The costs of recovery 
     shall be borne by the estate.''.

                       TITLE IV--OTHER PROVISIONS

     SEC. 401. UNION PROOF OF CLAIM.

       Section 501(a) of title 11, United States Code, is amended 
     by inserting ``, including a labor organization,'' after ``A 
     creditor''.

     SEC. 402. EXCEPTION FROM AUTOMATIC STAY.

       Section 362(b) of title 11, United States Code, is 
     amended--
       (1) in paragraph (27), by striking ``and'' at the end;
       (2) in paragraph (28), by striking the period at the end 
     and inserting ``; and''; and
       (3) by inserting after paragraph (28) the following:
       ``(29) of the commencement or continuation of a grievance, 
     arbitration, or similar dispute resolution proceeding 
     established by a collective bargaining agreement that was or 
     could have been commenced against the debtor before the 
     filing of a case under this title, or the payment or 
     enforcement of an award or settlement under such 
     proceeding.''.

                          ____________________