[Congressional Record Volume 164, Number 35 (Tuesday, February 27, 2018)]
[Senate]
[Pages S1236-S1237]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
Indian Health Service
Ms. WARREN. Mr. President, I rise today to call on President Trump to
nominate a Director for the Indian Health Service.
There are many critical issues facing Indian Country--economic
development, infrastructure, protection of Native lands, respect for
Tribal governments--and after years and years of broken promises,
discrimination, and neglect, Washington owes Tribes a fighting chance
to build stronger communities and a brighter future.
The Federal Indian trust responsibility means that Washington has a
basic legal obligation to the Tribes. Washington also has a fundamental
moral obligation, and that starts with basic healthcare.
American Indians have treaty rights to healthcare from the Federal
Government, but the U.S. Government cannot fulfill our treaty
obligations if key posts, such as the Director of IHS, lay vacant for
years.
The IHS is a big deal. It is the primary Federal healthcare provider
for American Indians and Alaska Natives. It serves 2.2 million people
spread across 36 States. It has a budget of nearly $5 billion annually.
The IHS provides care through more than 660 clinics, hospitals, and
health stations on or near reservations, many of them in remote and
rural locations located hours away from other health facilities. It
serves more than 13 million outpatient visitors a year.
The doctors, nurses, and other healthcare providers at IHS hospitals
and clinics do everything from delivering babies, to providing dental
services, to fighting the opioid crisis.
Right now, more than a year into President Trump's term, there is
still no permanent leader at the Indian Health Service. Two weeks ago,
the nomination for IHS Director was withdrawn, and there hasn't been a
Senate-confirmed Director for years. This leadership vacuum creates a
serious problem. The IHS cannot engage in long-term planning without a
permanent Director at the helm. It cannot officially fix problems at
hospitals that failed inspections and where Medicare and Medicaid
funding is in jeopardy. It cannot move as decisively to ensure that IHS
facilities stay open. It cannot implement agency-wide standards for
quality of care, as the Government Accountability Office has
recommended. The IHS cannot prioritize competing issues, solve serious
and longstanding problems, or work through how to meet multiple goals
more effectively.
Its relationship with other Federal agencies is weakened without a
stable leader--critical relationships with the Centers for Medicare and
Medicaid Services, the Office of Management and Budget, the Substance
Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, and the rest of the
Department of Health and Human Services. It cannot ensure that programs
like the Special Diabetes Program for Indians, which has created real,
positive outcomes, is implemented as well as possible. The IHS cannot
work out a direction for the Service and hold a single stable leader
accountable for doing a good job.
The IHS faces serious challenges that require the attention of a
permanent, dedicated Director. The agency is underfunded and has been
underfunded for a long time. As a result, its facilities often lack
medical equipment that many Americans take for granted when they visit
a clinic or a hospital, like an MRI machine or a functioning operating
room. A 2016 report by the inspector general of the U.S. Department of
Health and Human Services found that IHS hospital administrators have
had difficulty recruiting and retaining critical staff. Aging hospital
buildings and outdated equipment also raise concerns about patient
safety. The inspector general cites concerns about corroded pipes
leaking sewage into the OR and not being able to find replacement parts
to fix old equipment the hospitals are relying on. Doctors and nurses
should be able to focus on helping their patients get well, not on
whether the building is habitable and basic facilities are available.
There are also serious staffing shortages. At its Great Plains
facilities, for example, IHS vacancy rates have reached 37 percent.
Compare that to my home State of Massachusetts, where only 6 percent of
nursing jobs were vacant in 2015.
Tribal leaders are understandably concerned about the direction of an
[[Page S1237]]
agency that plays such a vital role in their communities. Here is what
I heard from Chairwoman Cheryl Andrews-Maltais, of the Wampanoag Tribe
of Gay Head--the Aquinnah--in Massachusetts: ``This vacancy has created
significant instability and negatively affects the already burdened IHS
system.'' She added: ``Not only is it a failure on the part of the
Federal Government to not adequately fund healthcare for Indians; the
failure to appoint someone to lead this critical service area is
considered by many Tribes as gross negligence.'' The chairwoman says
that the United States is failing to keep its word and failing to
fulfill its ``solemn responsibility'' to the Tribes. I agree with the
chairwoman.
Healthcare is a basic human right, and everyone in this country
deserves access to quality, affordable healthcare. But the stakes are
particularly high for Native people.
An American Indian or Alaska Native baby born today has a life
expectancy that is almost 4\1/2\ years shorter than the U.S. average.
These little babies are also more likely to die before they ever reach
their first birthday. Native infant mortality is about 25 percent
higher than for the U.S. as a whole.
Chronic diseases like diabetes and heart disease hit Native Americans
harder too. For instance, American Indians and Alaska Natives die from
diabetes at a rate that is three times higher than that of the entire
American population.
Mental health and addiction issues are also a very big concern. The
opioid epidemic has devastated communities all over our country, but it
is a particularly virulent problem for Native Americans, who have the
highest per capita rates of opioid overdoses in the country.
Similarly, the alcohol-related death rate for Native Americans is
about 500 percent higher than for the rest of the population.
Suicide rates are about 70 percent higher.
Everyone struggling with addiction deserves access to high-quality
treatment, no matter who they are or where they live. That is the only
way we are going to make progress in tackling this crisis. But right
now, in a place where the need is great, the Federal Government is
failing to provide adequate care.
With so much need, investing in improving the IHS should be a top
priority for Washington. I am glad that the Trump administration's
latest budget for the IHS includes a funding increase. Still, this
government needs to do more--much more. A Senate-confirmed Director can
serve as the advocate the IHS needs in order to get the resources it
deserves. In fact, Federal law explicitly says that advocating good
Indian health policy is one of the Director's job responsibilities. We
should be doing that job.
We need a good person in this job, which means the nominee must be
thoroughly vetted. But that is not an excuse for more delay or for the
White House to drag its feet. It needs to work with the Tribes to find
the right person for the job and then submit the nomination quickly.
The person who heads up the IHS should be knowledgeable and should
have a vision for how to deliver better healthcare to Native Americans.
The person should have the determination and commitment to push
Congress to meet its treaty obligations in providing healthcare to
Native communities.
The Trump administration doesn't have a stellar record when it comes
to nominating the right people for important jobs. I often strongly
disagree with the President's picks. But leaving hundreds of critical
posts across our government vacant, including the IHS Director, has a
devastating effect all its own.
It wasn't until just 2 weeks ago that President Trump finally named a
nominee to be Commissioner of the Administration for Native Americans.
Several offices in the Federal bureaucracy have an important role in
running important programs for Tribes, and the President hasn't
nominated heads for some of those offices--for instance, the Director
of the Department of Justice's Office on Violence Against Women, which
administers key grant programs for Tribal programs to combat domestic
violence and sexual assault, and the Assistant Secretary of the
Employment and Training Administration in the Department of Labor,
which provides workforce innovation and opportunity grants to Tribes
and Tribal organizations. These vacancies hit Native communities hard,
and they represent one more broken promise to Native people.
There is no excuse for delay. I urge President Trump to move quickly
to consult with Tribes and to submit a nomination for IHS Director. The
Native community should not have to wait any longer.
I yield the floor.
____________________