[Congressional Record Volume 164, Number 35 (Tuesday, February 27, 2018)]
[House]
[Pages H1286-H1287]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
RAISING A QUESTION OF THE PRIVILEGES OF THE HOUSE
Mr. THOMPSON of California. Mr. Speaker, I have a privileged
resolution at the desk, which I have previously noticed.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. The Clerk will report the resolution.
The Clerk read as follows:
Whereas, gun violence affects every community in our
Nation;
Whereas, 30 people are killed every day by someone using a
gun;
Whereas, more than 2,200 people have been killed this year
by someone using a gun;
Whereas, there have been at least 34 mass shootings this
year;
Whereas, while mass shootings often receive media
attention, gun violence is present every day in every
community;
Whereas, since the tragedy at Sandy Hook Elementary School,
the House of Representatives has held 43 moments of silence
to honor the memory of people killed by someone using guns;
Whereas, most gun owners are responsible and law-abiding;
Whereas, the Supreme Court, in its District of Columbia v.
Heller decision, recognized the right to keep and to bear
arms;
Whereas, the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act was
enacted on November 30, 1993;
Whereas, background checks have been successful and every
day stop more than 170 felons, some 50 domestic abusers, and
nearly 20 fugitives from buying a gun;
Whereas, over 2,000,000 gun sales were blocked since
enactment of the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act;
Whereas, 90 percent of all background checks are done
instantly;
Whereas, the States that require background checks, 47
percent fewer women are murdered by intimate partners;
Whereas, in States that require background checks, there
are 47 percent firearm suicides;
Whereas, in States that require background checks, 53
percent fewer law enforcement officers are killed by someone
using a gun;
Whereas, 97 percent of Americans polled support background
checks for all gun sales;
Whereas, in many States, no background check is required to
buy a gun online or at a gun show; and
Whereas, the President has said, ``Whether we are
Republican or Democrats must now focus on strengthening
Background Checks!'' Now, therefore, be it:
Resolved That the House of Representatives should
immediately consider H.R. 4240, the Public Safety and Second
Amendment Rights Protection Act of 2017, and H.R. 3464, the
Background Check Completion Act of 2017.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Does the gentleman from California wish to
present argument on the parliamentary question whether the resolution
presents a question of the privileges of the House?
Mr. THOMPSON of California. Mr. Speaker, yes, I do.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentleman is recognized on the question
of order.
Mr. THOMPSON of California. Mr. Speaker, it is our duty as lawmakers
and Representatives to pass laws that will make our communities safer.
So far, Mr. Speaker, Congress has done nothing in regard to gun
violence prevention, and that is shameful.
Every Member here knows that something must be done about gun
violence. We may not all agree on what that is, but everyone, from the
President of the United States of America to the inspiring young
leaders who are leading a movement today out of Florida, agrees we must
expand background checks. That is why we need this resolution and why
we must take up the bipartisan background bill immediately. You cannot
table the 30 people a day who are killed by someone using a gun.
Let us have this vote, Mr. Speaker. We have had too many moments of
silence. We have got a bill that is ready to come to the floor. It is
bipartisan, Democrats and Republicans supporting the bill, coauthoring
the bill.
Ninety-seven percent of the American people believe that we should
take up and vote for a measure regarding background checks. This is a
good bill. It should be brought to the floor.
The Republicans should not be silencing the wishes of the American
people. The Republican majority should not disallow hearings and votes
on this bill.
Mr. Speaker, it is past time.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. The remarks of the gentleman must be
confined to the question of order.
The Chair is prepared to rule.
The gentleman from California seeks to offer a resolution raising a
question of the privileges of the House under rule IX. The resolution
offered by the gentleman from California provides that the House should
vote on two specified measures.
One of the fundamental tenets of rule IX, as the Chair recently ruled
on December 10, 2015, is that a resolution expressing a sentiment that
the House should consider a particular bill does not qualify as a
question of the privileges of the House. Similarly, on February 6,
2018, the Chair ruled that a resolution providing that the House should
act on a specified item of business does not constitute a question of
the privileges of the House.
[[Page H1287]]
By calling for a vote on two particular measures, the resolution
expresses a legislative sentiment in violation of the principles
documented in sections 702 and 706 of the House Rules and Manual.
Accordingly, the resolution does not constitute a question of the
privileges of the House.
Mr. THOMPSON of California. Mr. Speaker, I appeal the ruling of the
Chair.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. The question is, Shall the decision of the
Chair stand as the judgment of the House?
Motion to Table
Mr. BURGESS. Mr. Speaker, I have a motion at the desk.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. The Clerk will report the motion.
The Clerk read as follows:
Mr. Burgess moves to table the appeal of the ruling of the
Chair.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. The question is on the motion to table.
The question was taken; and the Speaker pro tempore announced that
the ayes appeared to have it.
Mr. THOMPSON of California. Mr. Speaker, on that I demand the yeas
and nays.
The yeas and nays were ordered.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursuant to clause 8 of rule XX, this 15-
minute vote on the motion to table will be followed by 5-minute votes
on:
Ordering the previous question on House Resolution 748;
Adoption of House Resolution 748, if ordered;
Ordering the previous question on House Resolution 747; and
Adoption of House Resolution 747, if ordered.
The vote was taken by electronic device, and there were--yeas 228,
nays 184, not voting 18, as follows:
[Roll No. 83]
YEAS--228
Abraham
Aderholt
Allen
Amash
Amodei
Arrington
Babin
Bacon
Banks (IN)
Barletta
Barr
Barton
Biggs
Bilirakis
Bishop (MI)
Bishop (UT)
Blackburn
Blum
Bost
Brady (TX)
Brat
Bridenstine
Brooks (AL)
Brooks (IN)
Buchanan
Buck
Bucshon
Budd
Burgess
Byrne
Calvert
Carter (GA)
Chabot
Cheney
Coffman
Cole
Collins (GA)
Collins (NY)
Comer
Comstock
Conaway
Cook
Costello (PA)
Crawford
Culberson
Curbelo (FL)
Curtis
Davidson
Davis, Rodney
Denham
Dent
DeSantis
DesJarlais
Diaz-Balart
Donovan
Duffy
Duncan (SC)
Duncan (TN)
Dunn
Emmer
Estes (KS)
Farenthold
Faso
Ferguson
Fitzpatrick
Fleischmann
Flores
Fortenberry
Foxx
Frelinghuysen
Gaetz
Gallagher
Garrett
Gianforte
Gibbs
Gohmert
Goodlatte
Gosar
Gowdy
Granger
Graves (GA)
Graves (LA)
Griffith
Grothman
Guthrie
Handel
Harper
Harris
Hartzler
Hensarling
Herrera Beutler
Hice, Jody B.
Higgins (LA)
Hill
Holding
Hollingsworth
Hudson
Hultgren
Hunter
Hurd
Issa
Jenkins (KS)
Jenkins (WV)
Johnson (LA)
Johnson (OH)
Johnson, Sam
Jones
Jordan
Joyce (OH)
Katko
Kelly (MS)
Kelly (PA)
King (IA)
King (NY)
Kinzinger
Knight
Kustoff (TN)
Labrador
LaHood
LaMalfa
Lamborn
Lance
Latta
Lewis (MN)
LoBiondo
Loudermilk
Love
Lucas
Luetkemeyer
MacArthur
Marchant
Marino
Marshall
Massie
Mast
McCarthy
McCaul
McClintock
McHenry
McKinley
McMorris Rodgers
McSally
Meadows
Meehan
Messer
Mitchell
Moolenaar
Mooney (WV)
Mullin
Newhouse
Noem
Norman
Nunes
Olson
Palazzo
Palmer
Paulsen
Perry
Pittenger
Poe (TX)
Poliquin
Posey
Ratcliffe
Reed
Reichert
Renacci
Rice (SC)
Roby
Roe (TN)
Rogers (AL)
Rogers (KY)
Rohrabacher
Rokita
Rooney, Francis
Rooney, Thomas J.
Ros-Lehtinen
Roskam
Ross
Rothfus
Rouzer
Royce (CA)
Russell
Rutherford
Sanford
Scalise
Schweikert
Scott, Austin
Sensenbrenner
Sessions
Shimkus
Shuster
Simpson
Smith (MO)
Smith (NE)
Smith (NJ)
Smith (TX)
Smucker
Stefanik
Stewart
Stivers
Taylor
Tenney
Thompson (PA)
Thornberry
Tipton
Turner
Upton
Valadao
Wagner
Walberg
Walden
Walker
Walorski
Walters, Mimi
Weber (TX)
Webster (FL)
Wenstrup
Westerman
Williams
Wilson (SC)
Wittman
Womack
Woodall
Yoder
Yoho
Young (AK)
Young (IA)
Zeldin
NAYS--184
Adams
Aguilar
Barragan
Bass
Beatty
Bera
Beyer
Bishop (GA)
Blumenauer
Blunt Rochester
Bonamici
Boyle, Brendan F.
Brady (PA)
Brown (MD)
Brownley (CA)
Bustos
Butterfield
Capuano
Carbajal
Cardenas
Carson (IN)
Cartwright
Castor (FL)
Castro (TX)
Chu, Judy
Cicilline
Clark (MA)
Clarke (NY)
Clay
Clyburn
Cohen
Connolly
Cooper
Correa
Costa
Courtney
Crist
Crowley
Cuellar
Davis (CA)
Davis, Danny
DeFazio
DeGette
Delaney
DeLauro
DelBene
Demings
DeSaulnier
Deutch
Dingell
Doggett
Doyle, Michael F.
Ellison
Eshoo
Espaillat
Esty (CT)
Evans
Foster
Frankel (FL)
Fudge
Gabbard
Gallego
Garamendi
Gomez
Gonzalez (TX)
Gottheimer
Green, Al
Green, Gene
Grijalva
Gutierrez
Hanabusa
Hastings
Heck
Higgins (NY)
Himes
Hoyer
Huffman
Jackson Lee
Jayapal
Jeffries
Johnson (GA)
Johnson, E. B.
Kaptur
Keating
Kelly (IL)
Kennedy
Khanna
Kihuen
Kildee
Kilmer
Kind
Krishnamoorthi
Kuster (NH)
Langevin
Larsen (WA)
Larson (CT)
Lawrence
Lawson (FL)
Lee
Levin
Lewis (GA)
Lieu, Ted
Lipinski
Loebsack
Lofgren
Lowenthal
Lowey
Lujan Grisham, M.
Lujan, Ben Ray
Lynch
Maloney, Carolyn B.
Maloney, Sean
Matsui
McCollum
McEachin
McGovern
McNerney
Meeks
Meng
Moore
Moulton
Murphy (FL)
Nadler
Napolitano
Neal
Nolan
Norcross
O'Halleran
O'Rourke
Pallone
Panetta
Pascrell
Pelosi
Perlmutter
Peters
Peterson
Pingree
Pocan
Polis
Price (NC)
Quigley
Raskin
Rice (NY)
Richmond
Rosen
Roybal-Allard
Ruiz
Ruppersberger
Rush
Ryan (OH)
Sanchez
Sarbanes
Schakowsky
Schiff
Schneider
Schrader
Scott (VA)
Scott, David
Serrano
Sewell (AL)
Shea-Porter
Sherman
Sinema
Sires
Slaughter
Soto
Suozzi
Swalwell (CA)
Takano
Thompson (CA)
Thompson (MS)
Titus
Tonko
Tsongas
Vargas
Veasey
Vela
Visclosky
Wasserman Schultz
Waters, Maxine
Watson Coleman
Welch
Wilson (FL)
Yarmuth
NOT VOTING--18
Bergman
Black
Carter (TX)
Cleaver
Cramer
Cummings
Engel
Graves (MO)
Huizenga
Long
Payne
Pearce
Smith (WA)
Speier
Torres
Trott
Velazquez
Walz
{time} 1337
Messrs. TED LIEU of California, NEAL, PANETTA, RUSH, THOMPSON of
Mississippi, McEACHIN, and JOHNSON of Georgia changed their vote from
``yea'' to ``nay.''
So the motion to table was agreed to.
The result of the vote was announced as above recorded.
A motion to reconsider was laid on the table.
____________________