[Congressional Record Volume 164, Number 14 (Sunday, January 21, 2018)]
[Senate]
[Pages S396-S397]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
GOVERNMENT SHUTDOWN
Mr. SCHUMER. Mr. President, we now enter day 2 of the first real
government shutdown ever to take place when one party controlled the
Presidency, the House, and the Senate. Under this unified control, it
was the Republicans' job to govern. It was their job to lead. It was
their job to reach out to us and come up with compromise. They have
failed.
Our democracy was designed to run on compromise. The Senate was
designed to run on compromise. We are no dictatorship subject to the
whims of an Executive, just as we are not a one-party system, where the
winner of an election gets to decide everything and the minority
nothing.
We are a government that can only operate if the majority party--the
governing party--accepts and seeks compromise.
The majority, however, has forgotten the lessons of the Founding
Fathers. They have shown they do not know how to compromise. Not only
do they not consult us, they can't even get on the same page with their
President from their own party. The congressional leaders tell me to
negotiate with President Trump. President Trump tells me to figure it
out with the congressional leaders. This political catch-22--never seen
before--has driven our government to dysfunction.
Americans know why the dysfunction is occurring: a dysfunctional
President. Hence, we are in a Trump shutdown with party leaders who
will not act without him. It has created the chaos and the gridlock we
find ourselves in today. It all really stems from the President, whose
inability to clinch a deal has created the Trump shutdown.
I agree with Majority Leader McConnell. The Trump shutdown was
totally avoidable. President Trump walked away from not one but two
bipartisan deals, and that is after he walked away from an agreement in
principle on DACA that we reached way back in the fall of last year. If
he had been willing to accept any one of these deals, we wouldn't be
where we are today.
On Friday, in the Oval Office, I made what I thought was a very
generous offer to the President--the most generous offer yet. The
President demanded for months that a deal on DACA include the wall.
Most Democrats don't think the wall is effective. We think it is
expensive and a waste of money. We are all for tough border security,
but every expert will tell you that drones, sensory devices, roads, and
personnel are far more effective than the wall.
Because the President campaigned on the wall--even though he said it
would be paid for by Mexico--and demands the wall, for the sake of
compromise, for the sake of coming together, I offered it. Despite what
some people are saying on TV--and mind you, these folks were not in the
room during the discussion--that is exactly what happened. The
President picked a number for a wall. I accepted it. It wasn't my
number. It wasn't the number in the bills here. He picked it. It would
be hard to imagine a more reasonable compromise. All along, the
President has been saying: I will do DACA and Dreamers in return for
the wall. He has it. He can't take yes for an answer. That is why we
are here.
We don't have anyone in the White House, in the Senate, or in the
House, Republicans of the President's own party, to tell him he has to
straighten this whole thing out. He can't say yes one minute and no the
next--three, four, five times.
The bottom line is this: It would be hard to imagine a much more
reasonable compromise. I was, in principle, agreeing to help the
President get his signature campaign promise--something Democrats and
Republicans on the Hill staunchly oppose--in exchange for DACA, a group
of people the President said he has great love for. I essentially
agreed to give the President something he has said he wants in exchange
for something we both want, but only hours after he seemed to be very
open, very eager about that generous, tentative agreement--and it was
only tentative; there were no handshakes--he backed away from the last
best chance to avoid a shutdown.
That is why, from one corner of America to another, this is being
called the Trump shutdown. It is trending all over. People from one end
of the country to the other know it is the Trump shutdown, and they
know why. They have seen what the President has done. It is a direct
result of the President, who has been proved unwilling to compromise
and is, thus, unable to govern.
The deal wasn't everything the President wanted. It certainly wasn't
everything we wanted. It was a compromise--something nobody loved, but
everyone could live with; something good for the country. It would have
staved off a government shutdown on Friday. It could still reopen the
government today. I am willing to seal the deal to sit and work right
now with the President or anyone he designates. Let's get it done.
Meanwhile, the Republican leader would have you believe we Democrats
forced the shutdown. He forgets that several Members of his own party
voted against the CR. Are they holding the government hostage over
illegal immigration? No, it doesn't seem that way.
The Republican leader accuses Democrats of holding up pay for our
troops. I heard Speaker Ryan blame the Senate on TV, but yesterday
Senator McCaskill offered a motion to make sure our military gets paid,
and the majority leader himself objected. The
[[Page S397]]
majority leader prevented the troops from getting paid. This would have
passed in a minute. Speaker Ryan should talk to Leader McConnell, who
is the only person in the U.S. Senate standing in the way of paying our
troops, not anybody here.
We don't want to use the troops as hostages. Unfortunately, some on
the other side may be doing just that. We can make sure our troops get
paid right now if the majority leader would only consent. If there is
pride of authorship, let him offer the resolution. We will not block
it. We will applaud it. I hope it can happen as soon as possible.
The Republican leader also accuses Democrats of blocking CHIP, when
he full well knows every Democrat here supports extending CHIP. It is 4
months lapsed. Who let that happen? The Republican majority. A
Democratic majority would never have allowed CHIP to expire.
Now, just because it was placed on a CR--that was a bad idea for so
many reasons--Republicans want to pretend they are advocates of CHIP,
but quite the contrary. They were using the 10 million kids on CHIP and
holding them as hostages for the 800,000 kids who are Dreamers. Kids
against kids; innocent kids against innocent kids. That is no way to
operate in this country.
Again, a party that controls the House, the Senate, and the
Presidency would rather sit back and point fingers of blame than roll
up their sleeves and govern.
The way out of this is simple. Our parties are very close on all of
the issues we have been debating for months now. We are so close. I
believe, we might have had a deal twice, only for the President to
change his mind and walk away. The President must take yes for an
answer. Until he does, it is the Trump shutdown.
He has said he has a love for Dreamers. Let him show it. He said he
needs a wall and border security. Accept our offer to do both of those
things because we Democrats--while we think the wall will not
accomplish very much and cost a lot of money--we strongly believe in
border security and fully supported the President's budget proposal on
border security for this year.
So this is the Trump shutdown. Only President Trump can end it. We
Democrats are at the table ready to negotiate. The President needs to
pull up a chair and end this shutdown.
I yield the floor.
____________________