[Congressional Record Volume 164, Number 7 (Thursday, January 11, 2018)]
[Senate]
[Pages S145-S146]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection Act
Mr. MORAN. Mr. President, on Tuesday of this week, I regained my
previous held seat on the Senate Banking
[[Page S146]]
Committee, a committee I served on from 2011 until the beginning of
this Congress. While this committee sometimes flies under the radar for
many Americans, the oversight it conducts and the issues it considers
under its substantial jurisdiction are of great consequence to America
and to the American people.
The owners and employees of banking institutions have experienced
success when their communities experience success. What I am saying is,
how we lend money matters to every kind of person every day. So what we
have experienced across Kansas, in many instances, is difficulty and
really hard times.
I want to talk about community. Community financial institutions are
of great importance to the folks I represent in Kansas. What I want to
do, in part, with my opportunity to serve on the Banking Committee is
to make sure those financial institutions have a regulatory environment
in which they can benefit their communities and benefit the citizens
who live there.
Communities in Kansas are losing their hometown banks to
consolidation and sales, and some of these banks that are moving in
that direction have been family owned for generations. In order to
better understand why these lenders are consolidating or selling, I
have sought out the nature of this decline by speaking with financial
leaders from across the country. The overwhelming response I received
is that the costs associated with complying with new Federal
regulations are simply too much to absorb in their business model.
In the aftermath of our country's significant financial downturn, a
new regulatory framework was put in place to rein in those bad actors
and punish bad behavior that led us down that path in 2007 and 2008. We
have had more than 7 years to determine what the effects are of this
new regulatory environment--Dodd-Frank--and what it has meant to our
community banks and our community financial institutions. The most
glaring aspect of these new regulations is the disproportionate burden
placed upon those smaller institutions seeking to comply with their new
responsibilities.
Rather than extending credit to best fit the needs of their
customers, banks are exiting entire lines of business because the
penalties for making a mistake far outweigh the economic benefits
derived from extending a loan. I experienced this damaging news and
reality during the Senate Banking Committee's consideration of
legislation to reform the secondary mortgage markets in 2014. I was
attempting to solicit feedback from Kansas lenders of the financial
impact some of these proposed changes would have on their communities,
and what I learned, unfortunately, was this: ``Jerry, we don't make
home loans anymore.'' When pressed for a reason, they responded it just
didn't make business sense for them to do that any longer due to the
increased Federal regulators' crackdown on mortgage lending.
As a member of the Senate who cares deeply about rural America and
the special way of life we enjoy in Kansas, this is a very damaging
occurrence. If a community banker determines they can no longer extend
credit to what would have otherwise been a creditworthy borrower
because of the fear of making a mistake and the repercussions that
follow, then they decide not to make the loan at all and not even to be
in the business. What community would expect their financial
institutions in their community to refuse to make a home loan? It is
the American dream.
While community banks had been consolidating for a number of years
due to shifting demographics and market conditions, we cannot nor
should we attempt to discount the role the post-Dodd-Frank regulatory
environment has played in the acceleration of the harming of our
community banking structure.
I am not opposed to regulations, and neither are the community
bankers working to serve their communities, but there has to be
prioritization on the part of Congress to create an environment where
local lenders can succeed because the success of these institutions
means the success of their communities and the people who live there.
During the fall of 2015, I worked alongside a number of committee
colleagues--both Republicans and Democrats--to see if we could bridge
the divide and bring relief to our community lenders across the
country. While these efforts did not then produce a result, these
discussions demonstrated that the issues facing the financial service
world need not be partisan, and they sowed the seeds for what has now
resulted in legislation moving its way through the legislative process
today.
I am happy to support S. 2155, the Economic Growth, Regulatory
Relief, and Consumer Protection Act recently reported out of the
Banking Committee on a bipartisan vote. Many of the provisions in this
bill originated in legislation I have promoted since I came to the
Senate, first as the Communities First Act, and most recently as the
CLEAR Relief Act. While this legislation will not solve every issue
that needs to be solved, it is meaningful progress that will make a
difference.
It is Congress's responsibility to ensure that economic growth is not
needlessly impeded, and it is our duty to ensure that economic
opportunities flourish and that Americans have access to the tools
necessary to pursue the American dream.
The Banking Committee can and will play an important role in
providing these tools, and I feel fortunate to have the opportunity to
lend the voice of Kansans to that effort. I look forward to working
with the chairman, Mike Crapo, the Senator from Idaho, and the ranking
member, Sherrod Brown from Ohio, as we work together to make sure good
things happen in Kansas and across the country.
Again, I look forward to working with my colleagues on the Banking
Committee and on the Senate floor to see that all Americans have the
opportunity to have access to credit so we can continue to pursue
growing economic opportunities for all Americans to keep the American
dream alive and well.
I suggest the absence of a quorum.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will call the roll.
The legislative clerk proceeded to call the roll.
Mr. BLUNT. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the order for
the quorum call be rescinded.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.