[Congressional Record Volume 164, Number 2 (Thursday, January 4, 2018)]
[Senate]
[Pages S28-S29]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
FUNDING THE GOVERNMENT
Mr. SCHUMER. Mr. President, yesterday the four congressional leaders
had a positive and productive meeting with Budget Director Mulvaney and
representatives from the White House, including Mr. Short. It was a
good first step, but there is a lot of work to do. Ultimately, the
budget agreement must lift the spending caps with parity between
defense and urgent domestic priorities, it must include disaster aid, a
healthcare package, and an agreement to enshrine DACA protections
alongside additional border security.
Like our Republican colleagues, Democrats want to make sure our men
and women in uniform have the resources they need to do their jobs.
There is not an argument about that, but we also want to make sure
there are crucial investments in economic development and job creation
here at home--programs that support the middle class and help it grow.
That includes a number of things, including funding needed for the
opioid crisis. Life expectancy has gone down in America for the first
time in years because of deaths from the opioid abuse by young people
and middle-aged people. Are we just going to shrug our shoulders at
that? There is a lot more to do. It affects rural areas, urban areas,
and suburban areas. There have been 63,000 Americans who have died from
drug overdoses. Those are deaths on the battlefield, in a sense, as
well--often the flower of our youth, the prime of America, so many in
rural areas. These are kids who were full of potential. Many were
veterans dealing with the wounds of war. They served our country and
didn't get what they needed when they came home.
I had a father cry in my arms. His son had been grappling with
opioids. Finally, they had persuaded the son to sign up for a treatment
program, but the treatment program didn't have the funding it needed so
there was a long waiting list, and the son died of an overdose while
waiting on that list. We can't have that anymore.
What about veterans' healthcare? These are people who risked their
lives for us. We need to do it.
What about millions of hard-working Americans who need pensions? One
of the issues Americans are most worried about is pensions and
retirement. For years, they paid into these plans. They were told: You
know, when you retire, you are not going to be rich, you are not going
to be able to buy luxuries, but at least you will have a life of
dignity. Now those pensions have been robbed from so many people
throughout the country. Are we going to shrug our shoulders?
I hear the majority leader say he is not for parity. ``Parity'' is
not just a word, it is veterans, people who need opioid relief, and
middle-class folks and working people who need pensions. Are our
Republican colleagues going to do what they just did in the tax bill
and abandon the middle class? Are our Republican colleagues going to do
what they tried to do in the healthcare bill and take away healthcare
from millions of working people, people in the middle class? ``Parity''
is the term we use around here. I would rather call it defending
middle-class America. Just as it is important to defend America from
foreign enemies, which our military does so bravely and proudly, we
have to defend America here.
I plead with Leader McConnell not to abandon the middle class in this
bill. Funding the military is a worthy goal and so is helping the
middle class. For the past year, unfortunately, our Republican
colleagues have been doing what the very wealthy people want and
ignoring the middle class and working people. That is one of the
reasons right now so many Americans say they would rather have a
Democratic Senate than a Republican Senate. I would rather have a
Senate that helps the middle class, whatever the political outcome, but
our colleagues don't seem to be going for that.
I say to Leader McConnell, my friend, you cannot let the hard right
dictate what you want because the hard right and their wealthy
benefactors are not where America is. It is not even where the
Republican Party has always been.
Now, in addition to parity helping the middle class, we need to do
other things. We should pass a disaster package that treats all States
and territories fairly given the necessity of relief in Texas,
California, Louisiana, Florida, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin
Islands. By the way, we need to make sure we straighten out things in
the West so the Forest Service isn't robbed of the funding they need to
prevent future forest fires as they take the money out to handle
present forest fires. We need to do that.
I know a lot of Congressmen from the House want aid. Even though many
of them opposed aid when New York and New Jersey had a crisis, we are
not going to play tit for tat, but we want a fair bill, and we want our
priorities recognized as well.
Finally, there are the Dreamers. This must be done now. Leader
McConnell seems to think there is no urgency. We disagree strongly--
respectfully but strongly. There is an urgent need. We have hundreds of
thousands, perhaps millions, of Americans who want America to be their
country--who were
[[Page S29]]
brought here through no fault of their own, who are working in our
factories and offices, who are going to our schools, and who are
serving in our military. Right now, every morning they wake up with a
pit of fear in their heart that they will be deported and separated
from their families. There is a very strong urgency there, and we have
to get the Dreamers taken care of as well as these other needs.
So our language, our proposal on this budget deal is to take care of
the middle class in terms of pensions and opioids and veterans, take
care of disaster relief, take care of the healthcare problems we face--
we all know about CHIP, community health centers, and healthcare
extenders--and take care of both the border and the Dreamers. We can do
it all. We should do it all.
It is no secret that in each of these areas right now there are
sticking points, but there are potential points of agreement. All five
parties continue to have discussion groups on these four circles of
areas--and to do them concurrently and come up with solutions quickly
so we can meet that January 19 deadline because nobody wants
sequestration to go into effect for the military or nonmilitary side of
the budget. Our goal should be a global agreement on all these issues
by January 19. That is the best way to resolve the issues we face.
I see my dear friend from Georgia waiting, and I yield the floor to
him.
____________________