[Congressional Record Volume 163, Number 209 (Thursday, December 21, 2017)]
[Senate]
[Page S8231]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
EXTREME RHETORIC
Mr. FLAKE. Mr. President, 6 months ago, on a beautiful June morning,
just a few miles from here in Alexandria, VA, a man with a gun opened
fire on me and several of my Republican colleagues.
In the chaotic aftermath of that awful morning, the gunman's purpose
slowly became clear. Because of our beliefs and our political
affiliation, this individual believed my colleagues and I should die.
Since that day, I struggled to understand this thinking. How could any
American look onto a field that June morning, where a bunch of middle-
aged men were playing baseball, and see the enemy?
Some of the bombastic rhetoric being offered this week in response to
the tax reform bill has given me pause. If you listen to some of the
hyperbolic vitriol that opponents of this bill are producing, the
attitude that nearly killed my friend Steve Scalise and threatened many
more lives begins to make a perverse kind of sense.
When respectable public figures go on television or take to Twitter
and announce that thousands, if not millions, of Americans are going to
die as a direct result of the passage of a tax reform bill, what impact
do we expect this to have on the thinking of many Americans? If a
person takes such outlandish statements as true, attacking Members of
Congress in support of the measure almost appears to be a moral action.
This could lead someone to believe that killing a few legislators might
save the lives of millions of Americans.
Beyond the physical danger of promoting such misinformation, these
claims do grave harm to the legislative process. How are we expected to
work together to achieve anything if one side's position is viewed as
the end of America as we know it? One of my colleagues called this tax
reform bill ``the worst bill in the history of Congress.''
Upon the bill's passage, one media pundit went so far as to encourage
young Americans to flee their country and declared ``America died
tonight.''
Full-throated and passionate debate should always be encouraged. We
all love arguing the merits of supply-side economics, but this is not
that. This is demonizing of the worst kind. It leaves us all in this
body unable to engage in the kind of negotiations and compromise that
Congress was created to foster.
To be clear, this is not a problem with one party or of one moment.
During the public debate over the Affordable Care Act, Members of my
party engaged in similar tactics. I was in the House Chamber when one
of my Republican colleagues stood and yelled ``You lie'' at the
President of the United States. The accusation that passage of
healthcare reform legislation would result in so-called death panels
was promoted far and wide by many Republicans. One conservative
commentator suggested the government would begin educating seniors on
how to end their own lives.
A Republican legislator claimed that the bill would put seniors in a
position of being ``put to death by their government.'' This rhetoric
was wrong then, and it is wrong now.
The threat posed to all of us and to the democratic process for
giving in to extreme rhetoric is not theoretical. Some of us faced it
on that baseball field in Alexandria in June, and all of us have
witnessed its corrosive effect on Congress. I urge my colleagues, all
of us, let's end this practice where raw politics drowns out the
supplications of the better angels of our nature. Let us all be more
humble as to our predictive powers when it comes to placing a value on
the work we do here. In reality, this legislation will probably not
turn out to be as good as the proponents assert, nor as bad as the
opponents contend.
The country is watching. It is my hope that we--all of us--can eschew
contempt and vitriol in our speech and be more measured in our tone.
I yield the floor.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from Oregon.
____________________