[Congressional Record Volume 163, Number 187 (Wednesday, November 15, 2017)]
[Senate]
[Pages S7245-S7246]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
Republican Tax Plan
Mr. DURBIN. Mr. President, I came to the floor yesterday to speak on
the devastating impact the Republican tax plan would have on working
families in my home State of Illinois and other States across the
Nation.
It is no secret that the Republican plan would finance massive tax
cuts for the wealthiest people in America. They just can't help
themselves. Every time they look at the Tax Code, they think there has
to be a way to help the wealthiest people in our country. They usually
look at the estate tax, which is paid for by 1 out of every 1,000
Americans, and say: We have just got to spare these poor people who
have a net worth of over $11 million from paying any taxes to the
government. We have to spare them from paying this government for the
benefit that this great Nation has brought to them and their families
and businesses. That is where they start.
Then they do the alternative minimum tax, which is a tax that was
created so that if your accountants and bookkeepers and lawyers are the
sharpest on Earth and ended up finding that you had no tax liability,
you still paid a fair share for sustaining this great Nation that you
call home. They want to get rid of that, too, or at least dramatically
modify it.
They start off with the premise of making these tax cuts for the
wealthiest people in America the beginning point of tax reform, these
giveaways to people who are not even asking for them. They can't help
themselves. They always start there, and the American people know it.
When you ask the American people, what is this tax reform all about,
they say it is tax cuts for wealthy people. That is where it always
starts, and it does when the Republicans are the authors. That is what
we face again.
They try to argue that it is going to help working families. It will
help some--let me be honest about that--and yet you are going to find
many working families who are going to pay more instead of less because
of this so-called tax reform. Why would we ever do that?
Why would we give tax breaks to the wealthiest people in America--
permanent tax breaks--and then turn around and say to working families:
Sorry. Some of you will get help, but many of you will not.
In my home State of Illinois, the elimination of the State and local
tax exemption is going to be devastating to our State. We are in the
top five of States where the people in my State who pay income tax,
sales tax, and property tax can deduct those taxes from their Federal
income that is subject to taxation.
That is not a new idea. It has been around for decades. It really is
premised on the following: Americans should not have to pay tax on a
tax. If I pay $100 a month, and I pay my local property taxes, I
shouldn't be taxed on that $100. It is a double hit. It is not fair,
but the Republican plan believes that is what we should do.
I will tell the seven Republican Congressmen in my State, they ought
to go home and ask the people whom they represent what they think about
this one, the idea of double taxation that they would vote for and go
home and try to defend. I think it is going to be tough, very tough.
It is no secret that these tax cuts for the wealthy and large
corporations will end up raising taxes on a lot of Americans and
blowing a massive hole in the deficit.
I am going to quote a fellow who has been retired a few years from
Congress. His name is Dave Obey. He was a Congressman from Wisconsin.
Dave Obey used to say over and over again--and I am going to repeat it,
and I have credited him with it: Too many times politicians are posing
for holy pictures, but when it comes to the deficit and the debt, many
of my colleagues on the other side of the aisle pose for holy pictures
about the national debt whenever there is a Democratic President and
then get a swift case of amnesia whenever there is a Republican
President.
[[Page S7246]]
Here we go again. They are ignoring the reality that the tax cuts
they are promoting for the wealthiest and biggest corporations are
going to end up blowing a hole in the deficit--a hole in the deficit,
which is going to have to be paid for by future generations.
I used to watch as my Republican colleagues would get red in the face
talking about our national debt, but that, of course, was under a
Democratic President. Under a Republican President, it doesn't seem to
be a major issue. Incidentally, there is a way to plug that hole, and
somewhere along the way someone slipped and told us what it was.
If you want to plug the hole of $1.5 trillion in tax cuts to the
wealthy and big corporations, they propose cutting Medicare benefits
and Medicaid benefits, cutting the basic health insurance plans that
seniors and people in low-income categories use. Is that a sound
policy, to try to patch a hole in the deficit by taking healthcare
protection away from senior citizens in America--the 40-plus million
who count on it--or those who are under Medicaid? I think it is not.
It turns out that Chairman Hatch had a new surprise for us this week.
At 10:30 p.m. last night, Chairman Orrin Hatch released additional
changes to this bill, which is evolving before our eyes. It is a bill
which was not publicly announced until last Friday and is currently
being debated in the hopes that when we return a week after our
Thanksgiving recess, we will take it up and vote on it.
Does it seem like it is a hurried operation? Of course, it is. They
know that if these bills sit out long enough and people read them and
consider them, there will be a lot of questions asked that they can't
answer.
Chairman Hatch released additional changes to the bill, and they
decided to fund permanent tax cuts for some corporations. That is a
high priority for the Republicans--wealthy people, big corporations. So
how do they pay for permanent tax cuts for the biggest corporations? It
turns out that in addition to raising taxes on working families, the
Senate Republican tax bill would also raise health insurance premiums
on middle-income families. That is right. The Republicans propose that
their tax bill would also repeal parts of the Affordable Care Act. As a
result, the Congressional Budget Office tells us that an estimated 13
to 14 million Americans will lose their health insurance protection
because of the Republican tax giveaway plan. I thought that plan was
supposed to help working families. It ends up taking away their health
insurance.
For those who can still remain in the market buying health insurance,
they can anticipate their premiums for health insurance going up 10
percent. What kind of tax cut is this that ends up raising the cost of
health insurance for working families and ends up eliminating health
insurance for many middle-income families?
I find it hard to believe the satisfaction so many Republicans take
to be able to boast and brag that they passed a bill that took away
health insurance for Americans. You are proud of that? I wouldn't be.
We should be doing the opposite--expanding the reach of health
insurance, making sure every American has the peace of mind and health
insurance they need for them and their families.
Remember when Republicans campaigned on the promise of increasing the
number of people with insurance and decreasing premiums? This tax bill
does just the opposite.
Haven't my Republican colleagues learned the lessons of the ACA--
Affordable Care Act--repeal by now? We spent the whole year in a vain
effort by the Republicans to repeal and barely replace. The American
people don't want it. Overwhelmingly, they are against it.
My hospitals in Illinois and across this Nation don't want what the
Republicans are proposing in their bill. Patients don't want it. Nurses
don't want it. Clinics don't want it. The disabled community doesn't
want it. The Republicans are determined to do it anyway.
Senior leaders are against it, faith leaders are against it, the
American people are against it, but this is going to be the feather in
the cap for the Republican majority; that by the end of this year, they
hope to pass a tax reform bill that is going to give tax breaks to the
wealthiest, give a permanent tax break to the biggest corporations,
make the middle-income families pay for it, eliminate 13 to 14 million
Americans' health insurance, and raise their premiums. What a package.
You have to work overtime to put together a package that damaging to
working families in America, but that is what they are pushing. That is
what they are determined to do.