[Congressional Record Volume 163, Number 183 (Thursday, November 9, 2017)]
[Senate]
[Page S7147]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
The Great Lakes and Underwater Oil Pipelines
Mr. PETERS. Mr. President, next to our people, the Great Lakes are
unquestionably Michigan's greatest resource. They are more than an
economic engine. They are more than a source of drinking water for 40
million people. They are more than a destination for tourists, boaters,
and anglers from across the globe. While the Great Lakes are certainly
all of those things, in Michigan, they are also a way of life. They
are, quite simply, home. You cannot sit on the edge of one of our
massive inland seas without feeling a sense of awe and gratitude.
Next to me is a photo of the Straits of Mackinac, a 5-mile stretch of
water where Lake Michigan meets Lake Huron and where Michigan's Upper
and Lower Peninsulas are connected by the Mackinac Bridge.
Unfortunately, today I cannot look out at these straits without
feeling a grave concern. The Straits of Mackinac are home to powerful
currents. Water, at times, flows through at a volume greater than 10
times that of Niagara Falls. The currents are also unpredictable, as
they can flow in any direction and can change not only by the season or
even by the day, but they can actually change by the hour.
The straits are also home to twin underwater oil pipelines that are
operated by Enbridge, known as Line 5, that are now 64 years old and
getting older by the day. A recent study by the University of Michigan
found that the Straits of Mackinac are the absolute worst possible
place for an oilspill anywhere in the entire Great Lakes Basin.
Without question, there is no way that this pipeline would have been
built today, but it is there, and we need the toughest protections and
strictest accountability possible. To put these in place, I worked to
pass bipartisan legislation to designate the Great Lakes as an
unusually sensitive area, which requires the highest possible operating
standards under Federal law.
Rigorous Federal oversight is critical, but pipeline owners and
operators must do their part as well by being transparent and
forthcoming.
While Enbridge assured us repeatedly that Line 5 is ``as good as
new,'' we found out in August that there are bandaid-sized gaps where
protective coatings had worn completely away and exposed the bare metal
underneath to the harsh underwater environment in the straits. Last
month, we learned of six additional locations with damage to the
protective coatings, leaving areas as big as 1 square foot of exposed
bare metal at each location. Then, on October 27, 2017, just 2 weeks
ago, Enbridge disclosed that its pipeline integrity department knew of
the damage that it had caused to the pipeline while conducting
maintenance in 2014--3 years ago.
I share the concerns that have been expressed by thousands of
Michiganders who dread the worst case oilspill scenario, and I share
their frustration and their anger at being misled. It is unacceptable
that damage to a pipeline running through the Great Lakes could go
unreported for 3 weeks, let alone 3 years.
Simply put, Enbridge does not deserve our trust, and we deserve some
answers. This is why, earlier this week, I called on the Pipeline and
Hazardous Materials Safety Administration to exercise its oversight
role and conduct a thorough investigation--examine any potential safety
or reporting violations--and assure all Michiganders of the safety and
integrity of Line 5, if at all possible. I also joined Senator Stabenow
in demanding answers from Enbridge's CEO to three very critical
questions:
One, what are you doing to fix your broken reporting procedures?
Two, is there any other unreported damage to Line 5?
Three, how can we be certain that regulators are being fully informed
by your company?
We need these answers, and we must get them.
I will never stop fighting to hold pipeline operators accountable and
to keep our Great Lakes safe and clean. The Great Lakes are home, and I
will do everything that I can to protect them for generations to come.
I yield the floor.
I suggest the absence of a quorum.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will call the roll.
The senior assistant legislative clerk proceeded to call the roll.
Ms. KLOBUCHAR. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the order
for the quorum call be rescinded.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.