[Congressional Record Volume 163, Number 175 (Monday, October 30, 2017)]
[Senate]
[Pages S6865-S6866]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
Russia Investigation
Mr. NELSON. Mr. President, everybody in Washington now knows that the
special counsel has announced charges against two of President Trump's
former campaign aides in connection with the ongoing investigation into
whether Russia interfered with the 2016 election.
After painstaking investigations in the intelligence community, we
now know that, in fact, Russia did interfere in the election. Since
they have continued this pattern in other countries' elections, what
many of us are concerned about is the fact that they will interfere in
the next elections coming up. We have already seen attempts in the
special election down in Alabama. They have been trying to increase the
number of hits going to a Facebook or Twitter account. So they
interfered.
We also learned this morning that a third former Trump campaign aide
has pled guilty to lying to the FBI in January when he was asked about
his interactions while he was with the Trump campaign.
These are very serious charges, and we should be united against any
individual who helped further Russia's interference in our elections.
Yet, sadly, the response to these indictments has been seemingly split
along partisan lines. That doesn't make sense. Defending America isn't
a partisan issue. In fact, everyone in the Senate--all of our
Democrats, Republicans, our two Independents--has sworn an oath to do
exactly that, to defend the Constitution against all enemies, both
foreign and domestic. So charging these individuals shouldn't be seen
as a victory for one party or another. It shouldn't be seen as a defeat
for a party. These individuals are charged with crimes against the
United States, crimes against all of us Americans.
The fact is that Russian President Vladimir Putin interfered in our
election, and in so doing, he has attacked the very foundation of our
constitutional democracy. We know that, and we also know that we are
not the only country he has attacked. According to the U.S.
intelligence community, he will continue this type of behavior unless
he is stopped, and that is why we have such a heavy responsibility to
defend America from these kinds of attacks and to defend our American
constitutional foundations that are built on a process of free and fair
and unfetterred elections.
It doesn't matter whether you are a Democrat or a Republican, it
should be clear: If you help an enemy of the United States meddle in
our democracy, you will be held accountable.
Here in this Senate and throughout the country as a whole, too often
we find ourselves suddenly divided on issues because of party politics.
That shouldn't be the case. There should be no disagreement when it
comes to protecting America because we should be Americans first--not
Democrats or Republicans first; we should be Americans first.
We must continue to be patient with the Mueller investigation and
allow it to follow the facts wherever they may lead because finding out
what happened is the only way we are going to be able to prevent this
from happening again, and it is the only way we are going to be able to
keep our country safe.
I yield the floor.
I suggest the absence of a quorum.
The PRESIDING OFFICER (Mrs. Ernst). The clerk will call the roll.
The bill clerk proceeded to call the roll.
Mr. BARRASSO. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the order
for the quorum call be rescinded.
The PRESIDING OFFICER (Mr. Moran). Without objection, it is so
ordered.
Under the previous order, all postcloture time is expired.
The question is, Will the Senate advise and consent to the McFadden
nomination?
Mr. BARRASSO. Mr. President, I ask for the yeas and nays.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Is there a sufficient second?
There appears to be a sufficient second.
The clerk will call the roll.
The legislative clerk called the roll.
Mr. CORNYN. The following Senators are necessarily absent: the
Senator from Tennessee (Mr. Alexander) and the Senator from Arizona
(Mr. McCain).
Further, if present and voting, the Senator from Tennessee (Mr.
Alexander) would have voted ``yea.''
Mr. DURBIN. I announce that the Senator from Missouri (Mrs.
McCaskill), the Senator from New Jersey (Mr. Menendez), the Senator
from Oregon (Mr. Merkley), and the Senator from Vermont (Mr. Sanders)
are necessarily absent.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Are there any other Senators in the Chamber
desiring to vote?
The result was announced--yeas 84, nays 10, as follows:
[[Page S6866]]
[Rollcall Vote No. 253 Ex.]
YEAS--84
Baldwin
Barrasso
Bennet
Blumenthal
Blunt
Boozman
Burr
Capito
Cardin
Carper
Casey
Cassidy
Cochran
Collins
Coons
Corker
Cornyn
Cortez Masto
Cotton
Crapo
Cruz
Daines
Donnelly
Duckworth
Durbin
Enzi
Ernst
Feinstein
Fischer
Flake
Franken
Gardner
Graham
Grassley
Hassan
Hatch
Heinrich
Heitkamp
Heller
Hirono
Hoeven
Inhofe
Isakson
Johnson
Kaine
Kennedy
King
Klobuchar
Lankford
Leahy
Lee
Manchin
McConnell
Moran
Murkowski
Murphy
Nelson
Paul
Perdue
Portman
Reed
Risch
Roberts
Rounds
Rubio
Sasse
Schatz
Schumer
Scott
Shaheen
Shelby
Stabenow
Strange
Sullivan
Tester
Thune
Tillis
Toomey
Udall
Van Hollen
Warner
Whitehouse
Wicker
Young
NAYS--10
Booker
Brown
Cantwell
Gillibrand
Harris
Markey
Murray
Peters
Warren
Wyden
NOT VOTING--6
Alexander
McCain
McCaskill
Menendez
Merkley
Sanders
The nomination was confirmed.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Under the previous order, the motion to
reconsider is considered made and laid upon the table and the President
will be immediately notified of the Senate's action.
____________________