[Congressional Record Volume 163, Number 172 (Wednesday, October 25, 2017)]
[Senate]
[Pages S6805-S6809]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]



                               Healthcare

  Ms. WARREN. Mr. President, on September 30, the Children's Health 
Insurance Program expired. It has now been 25 days since the Congress 
has put our children's health and well-being on the back burner. My 
colleagues and I do not think that children's health belongs on the 
back burner. So we have come to the floor of the Senate to spend the 
afternoon speaking up for kids.
  Thank you to everyone who joins me today to say that we should not 
wait any longer to make sure that children, community health centers, 
and new mothers have access to the healthcare programs that they need.
  Republicans control Congress. It is up to them what we vote on and 
when we do it. So what was more important to the Republican leadership 
than the health of little kids? Republican leaders blew through the 
days before the children's healthcare deadline by trying to repeal 
healthcare for millions of Americans.
  Once the Children's Health Insurance Program had already expired, 
Republican leaders burned through more time by holding a series of 
votes on a budget with giant tax cuts for billionaires and giant 
corporations that would also gut Medicare, Medicaid, and a bunch of 
programs that help working families. Republicans jammed through their 
terrible budget without a single Democratic vote last week, 19 days 
after blowing past the deadline to fund healthcare for kids.
  Last night, 24 days past the deadline to make sure the kids had 
healthcare coverage, what were Republican leaders doing? Republican 
leaders stayed up late into the night holding a vote to make it easier 
for financial institutions to cheat people.
  The days continue to tick by--24, 25. Tomorrow Members of Congress 
will leave for the weekend, 26 days past the deadline, and still there 
will be no vote to fund this critical program.
  Senator Ted Kennedy and Senator Orrin Hatch, a Democrat and 
Republican, wrote this legislation together back in the late 1990s. The 
Children's Health Insurance Program, also called CHIP, provides health 
insurance to low-income children and to pregnant women. Senator Kennedy 
and Senator Hatch created this program because they knew that providing 
healthcare coverage for children would make them healthier as children 
and healthier even after they grew up. They knew that some children 
were slipping through the cracks, and this was their solution. The 
children covered by CHIP didn't qualify for Medicaid, they weren't 
covered by employers, and they couldn't afford to buy private 
insurance.
  In 1997, 15 percent of all the children in this country lacked any 
form of health insurance coverage. Today, because of the CHIP program 
and the Affordable Care Act, that number has shrunk to 5 percent of 
children. CHIP works with Medicaid to provide health insurance for one 
out of every three kids in this country.
  States choose whether or not they want a CHIP program. Here is the 
deal. Every single State has chosen one because every single State 
recognizes the value of providing their children with healthcare 
coverage. In Massachusetts, the percentage of children with healthcare 
coverage is even higher than the national average. It is at 99 percent. 
We are doing something right here.
  The original program was set for 10 years, and since then, every few 
years, Congress has had to act to reauthorize the program so that 
children can continue to get healthcare coverage. The CHIP program has 
been reauthorized four times since 1997, and not one of those times has 
Congress missed the deadline--not one--until now. In fact, in past 
years, Congress has made sure to reauthorize the program many months 
ahead of its expiration in order to give States the time they need to 
plan their budget. It sounds like a pretty sensible thing to do--but 
not this year. We are 25 days past the deadline for reauthorizing 
CHIP--25 days and counting. This isn't fair to States, to kids, or to 
their families.
  So what actually happens now?
  Well, the money runs out. Eleven States are set to run out of their 
CHIP funding by the end of 2017, and the others, soon after. Our 
Republican Governor in Massachusetts sent me a letter on day 3 past the 
CHIP deadline, and he wrote:

       Parents are already afraid that their children's insurance 
     may be lost in the near future. With each passing week, their 
     fears continue to grow.

  My Governor is right. States have to start making tough decisions. 
They may have to decrease enrollment, turning away sick little kids who 
qualify for coverage but don't make it through the door on time. They 
could start kicking kids off of their insurance saying: Sorry, we just 
can't help anymore. Or they could be forced to make tough calls on 
benefits: We can't cover the wheelchair you need to get around. There 
is no physical therapy or no prenatal care until the funding comes 
through again.
  That is just flat out immoral. Tax cuts for billionaires shouldn't 
come before making sure that a sick kid gets the help he or she needs. 
Mothers are lying awake at night. Fathers are tossing and turning, 
worrying about their healthcare coverage. What is the Republican 
leadership doing? Tomorrow they will be heading home for the weekend 
without lifting a finger to fund a bipartisan program that has been 
reauthorized four times over the past 20 years.
  If that isn't bad enough, September 30 wasn't just the deadline for 
Congress to reauthorize CHIP. We also blew past the deadline on several 
other healthcare programs to help children, to help pregnant women, to 
help older Americans, and to help the chronically ill. We blew past the 
deadline to reauthorize the Community Health Center Fund and the 
National Health Service Corps, which funds health centers and supports 
healthcare workers that provide children with high-quality primary 
care. We blew past the deadline to reauthorize the Maternal, Infant, 
and Early Childhood Home Visiting Program, which funds home visits to 
new and expectant parents to give them help keeping a new baby healthy 
and safe. We blew past the deadline to reauthorize the Special Diabetes 
Program, which funds diabetes research that could offer hope to many 
children living with diabetes.
  When a kid is sick, moms and dads move Heaven and Earth to get them 
the care they need. They don't wait 25 days to go to the doctor and 
check to see if something is wrong. They stay up all night to make sure 
their little ones are all right. They wait outside the hospital room, 
pacing until they get an answer, but Republican leaders in Congress 
just don't seem to care. They don't seem to care if these families have 
the health insurance coverage they need so they can get an x ray or pay 
for an antibiotic or run some tests.
  Twenty-five days, 26 days, 27 days--it just doesn't seem to matter to 
Republican leaders, but it sure matters to moms and dads and kids in 
Massachusetts and all over this country.
  Senator Kennedy used to say: ``The test of greatness for a nation is 
how it cares for its children.'' Right now Republican leaders in 
Congress are failing that test. My colleagues have come to the floor 
today to say that time is up. We are here to fight for kids.
  I yield the floor.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from Delaware.

[[Page S6806]]

  

  Mr. COONS. Mr. President, I rise in support of my colleagues who have 
come to the floor to urge the Senate to quickly pass funding for the 
Children's Health Insurance Program, known as CHIP.
  CHIP provides comprehensive health insurance to 9 million low-income 
children who don't qualify for Medicaid, including 18,000 children in 
my home State of Delaware. Lots of other States would say that 18,000 
children is a small number, but in Delaware that is a significant 
population. Bluntly, whether it is 1 or 100 or 1,000 or 18,000, how can 
we allow inaction in this Chamber to put at risk the healthcare of 
millions of children across our country?
  It has now been more than 3 weeks since funding for CHIP expired. 
While some States have enough money in their accounts to carry them 
through to the end of the year or just beyond, the uncertainty about 
when or if CHIP funds will be reauthorized is causing chaos, concern, 
and anxiety across the country. Some States will have to start issuing 
notices to households that they will face the loss of CHIP coverage. 
Imagine the unnecessary fear this will bring to parents and families 
and struggling households across the country as they are facing other 
challenges in their life.
  This is totally unnecessary. We can stop this uncertainty right now 
and bring needed stability for parents, children, and States and show 
some kind of leadership from our Federal Government. I am a proud 
cosponsor of the bipartisan KIDS Act, S. 1827, being led by Senator 
Orrin Hatch of Utah and Senator Ron Wyden of Oregon. This KIDS Act 
would extend funding for CHIP for 5 years. I urge the Senate to do 
right by America's children and America's working families and swiftly 
take up and pass this bill.
  While we are on the topic of programs desperately in need of 
reauthorization, I also want to draw attention to the expiration of the 
Community Health Center Fund, which ensures access to cost-effective 
primary and preventive care for 26 million patients across the country. 
In my home State of Delaware, about 50,000 Delawareans benefit from 
several community health centers that are widely respected, well run, 
and provide affordable, accessible, and preventive healthcare in 
communities up and down my State. Funding for this critical program 
also lapsed more than 3 weeks ago, and now, sadly, community health 
centers across my State and across the country are struggling to make 
key decisions--decisions like signing new leases or signing on new 
medical personnel to positions. Without certainty that the Federal 
Government will authorize their funding, how can we expect health 
centers to plan, to provide services, and to provide preventive 
healthcare that improves health and strengthens our community?
  We should do everything we can to swiftly pass a 5-year 
reauthorization for funding for community health centers, such as the 
bipartisan bill that Senator Blunt of Missouri and Senator Stabenow of 
Michigan have introduced, the Community Health Investment, 
Modernization, and Excellence Act of 2017, S. 1899, which I am proud to 
support.
  Folks, I urge that we work together in a bipartisan way. We should 
not be using children's access to healthcare as a bargaining chip. We 
should be taking up these two bills to provide reauthorization, 
funding, and certainty immediately for both CHC and CHIP funding now 
and without hesitation.
  With that, I yield the floor.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from Pennsylvania.
  Mr. CASEY. Mr. President, as you know, the Children's Health 
Insurance Program expired on September 30, in large part because we 
spent much of this year and the days leading up to that date debating 
the repeal of the Affordable Care Act, instead of focusing on 
bipartisan priorities like the Children's Health Insurance Program. As 
a result, the program known as CHIP expired and the health of 9 million 
children, including some 340,000 Pennsylvania children, are now at 
risk.
  CHIP is not just a bipartisan program but a successful program with a 
Pennsylvania history. It was modeled after a State program in 
Pennsylvania that was signed into law by my father when he served as 
Governor in the early 1990s. The program provides affordable health 
insurance to children whose family incomes mean they don't qualify for 
Medicaid but still struggle to find affordable health insurance 
options. It is a program that working families rely upon and that 
provides peace of mind to parents.

  Many families turn to CHIP during times of economic hardship, such as 
when a parent loses his or her job. At such a stressful time, I have 
heard from parents over and over how they have peace of mind knowing 
that their children will get the healthcare they need.
  Some parents who rely upon CHIP for their children are, in fact, 
students, working and going to school so they can make that leap into 
stable, middle-class life. They may not have a job with health 
insurance or they may not be able to afford the insurance, but they 
know their children will get the healthcare they need.
  Regardless of what drives families to the CHIP program, it is thanks 
in large part to CHIP that the United States of America has the highest 
rate of insured children in our Nation's history. According to the 
Census Bureau, 95.5 percent of children had health insurance in 2016. 
CHIP is also a popular program, as repeated studies have demonstrated. 
Parents think CHIP is a valuable program, and they are satisfied with 
the coverage and with the care their children receive.
  Unless the Senate acts and acts very soon, we will have betrayed all 
of those children and all of those families. There is no reason for 
CHIP to have expired and no reason why we shouldn't pass the bill right 
now, if not in the next couple of days--certainly, in the next 2 or 3 
weeks--to ensure that not one single child loses his or her health 
insurance.
  We have taken important steps to extend the program. The Finance 
Committee marked up the bipartisan Keep Kids' Insurance Dependable and 
Secure Act of 2017, known by the acronym K-I-D-S, or KIDS. The KIDS Act 
came out of the Finance Committee, which reauthorizes CHIP for 5 years, 
and that happened some 3 weeks ago. I am proud to be a cosponsor of 
that bill.
  So it is time to act. We have a commonsense, bipartisan, successful 
bill in the Senate that is ready to go. It is out of the Finance 
Committee. So I would urge my colleagues to join me and to join others 
who have come to the floor today and on earlier days to take swift 
action to pass the KIDS Act.
  I yield the floor.
  I suggest the absence of a quorum.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER (Mr. Lee). The clerk will call the roll.
  The senior assistant legislative clerk proceeded to call the roll.
  Mr. BROWN. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the order for 
the quorum call be rescinded.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
  Mr. BROWN. Mr. President, healthcare for our Nation's children is 
something we ought to be able to all come together on, but this 
Congress, which has not done much of anything, is always able to find a 
way to help Wall Street. Think about the middle-of-the-night vote last 
night, where the Vice President of the United States came to the rescue 
of Equifax and the rescue of Wells Fargo and the rescue of Wall Street 
overall. Think of the celebrations last night on Wall Street because of 
that tie vote, which stripped consumers of their days in court. It 
stripped consumers of their consumer rights.
  This Congress, when it came to the Children's Health Insurance 
Program, allowed it to expire at the end of last month. It left 
millions of families afraid they will lose healthcare for their kids. 
Think about what this uncertainty means for parents. Trying to make 
sure your children are safe and healthy is enough to worry about.
  Families shouldn't have to fear losing coverage for their kids 
because of some politicians in Washington. All of us have taxpayer-
funded health insurance. Some politicians in Washington don't seem to 
care much about these kids.
  In my State, more than 200,000-plus children have insurance under 
CHIP. So even if something happens to their parents--even if they lose 
their job or their insurance--those 200,000-plus children in Ohio have 
insurance because of CHIP. But it expired on September 30.
  Governor Kasich is a Republican. I am a Democrat. We stand together 
on

[[Page S6807]]

this, as we stand together protecting Medicaid and as we stand together 
protecting the Affordable Care Act. He tells us that there is still a 
little bit of money left over in Ohio to get us through these next few 
weeks until Congress does its job. But that doesn't mean parents don't 
worry about their children possibly losing their health insurance.
  Kids on CHIP are a little more likely to have asthma or a little bit 
more likely to have an illness, in part because they are low-income 
kids and they may live near a bus line and the air they breathe may not 
quite be so good. Or they live in Appalachia, where they might not be 
able to get to the doctor quickly. Those kids are more at risk, and 
those parents are worried, even though Governor Kasich assures them and 
I assure them we are going to do this.
  Congress worked into the middle of the night last night and debated 
for hours on a giveaway to Wall Street. They debated for hours on 
helping Equifax, which abused the public trust of 145 million people--5 
million in my State. They bailed out Wells Fargo, which fraudulently 
attacked, for want of a better term, 3.5 million customers. Congress 
can bail them out, but it can't pass the Children's Health Insurance 
Program?
  Because of CHIP, 209,000--I said more than 200,000 before; more 
precisely, 209,000 Ohio children have access to affordable healthcare 
today--healthcare they may not have received otherwise. That is the 
importance of this program. It used to be bipartisan until this 
Congress, always in its rush to help Wall Street, forgot about these 
children.
  This program provides peace of mind for parents. Regardless of 
income, when a parent knows that a daughter or a son has health 
insurance, it provides peace of mind. They know if their child has a 
sore throat or earache, they don't have to wait until the child is so 
sick they take her to the emergency room. They won't have to hesitate 
or wonder if they can afford the doctor visit or antibiotic. They get 
the care their kids need.
  Most of us in this body are parents. Most of us in this body have 
insurance provided by taxpayers. Wouldn't you think that this would be 
important enough to Leader McConnell and the leaders of this body and 
to President Trump and to Speaker Ryan? Wouldn't you think it would be 
important enough?
  We all talk about loving our kids. We talk about grandchildren. Most 
of us are at the age where many of us have grandchildren. We don't care 
enough about these children as we get insurance from taxpayers. We 
don't care enough about these kids to do this?
  It has already been 3 weeks now since CHIP expired. CHIP means a 
child in Cincinnati or Dayton or Portsmouth or Akron or Youngstown or 
Mansfield can see a family doctor when they need it, preventing a 
costly ambulance ride and emergency room visit. CHIP means getting 
vaccines and shots. It means having dental coverage. We know what 
happens to low-income kids who don't get good dental care.
  The State of Ohio probably has enough money to help protect CHIP kids 
through the end of the year, but Congress needs to act now.
  I have met with CHIP families across Ohio. Let me tell you some 
stories. Josh, whom I met in Cleveland--his children were covered by 
CHIP when he was laid off from his job. He said, ``The ability to take 
health insurance out of the equation, feeling confident that my family 
will continue to get the same quality of care they had while I was 
working, was a huge weight lifted.'' Think about that.
  This father, knowing that he has insurance--he had plenty of things 
to worry about. He lost his job. Who knows what that means about their 
home and their lifestyle and their family? But at least he knew he 
could rely on insurance--until now. Look what this Congress has failed 
to do.
  Think about Noble from Columbus, who came to my office earlier this 
year with his mom to talk about how important CHIP is. Noble relies on 
CHIP for coverage for the five pediatric specialists he sees at one of 
America's great hospitals, Nationwide Children's Hospital in Columbus.
  My colleagues need to think about Josh and his kids in Cleveland and 
Noble and his mom in Columbus. We need to think about the mother of a 
son with diabetes, worrying about whether her son will be able to see 
the same doctor next year or about a father with a daughter with 
asthma, praying she doesn't lose her inhaler on the playground because 
in a few months they might not have insurance to pay for that inhaler.

  My wife has asthma, and I know what that means. She had a father who 
had health insurance through his union plan with the Illuminating 
Company in Northeast Ohio. He worked maintenance. It was a good blue-
collar job. It didn't pay enough to send her to college, but it did pay 
enough with good insurance that it gave them a decent lifestyle. They 
didn't have CHIP back then. More people had union plans. More people 
were protected.
  We used to have CHIP until September 30, when this Congress didn't 
care enough to provide it. We should not be playing politics with 
families' lives.
  Two years ago, I led the fight in this body to protect CHIP. Because 
of that work, with the support of advocates all across Ohio--and there 
are so many of them across the country--we extended funding for CHIP 
for 2 years. Again, this was with bipartisan support, back when 
Congress operated that way.
  We have already come a long way this year. We passed a 5-year 
extension of CHIP out of the Senate Finance Committee. It had every 
vote in that Committee, with the exception of one. I thank Senator 
Hatch and Senator Wyden and my colleague from Ohio, Senator Portman, 
and so many of our colleagues for their help with that.
  But this process is taking too long. Josh and Noble and the 209,000 
Ohioans and 9 million children across the country are in a situation in 
which their parents are unsure of whether they will have insurance 
through the end of the year and next year and the year after.
  It is time for us to come together to ensure that the families we 
work for have the healthcare they need for their children.
  I yield the floor.
  I suggest the absence of a quorum.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will call the roll.
  The legislative clerk proceeded to call the roll.
  Ms. HIRONO. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the order for 
the quorum call be rescinded.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
  Ms. HIRONO. Mr. President, Donald Trump and the Republican Congress 
have spent most of the past year pushing their misplaced priorities, no 
matter the direct and collateral damage it causes for millions of 
Americans across the country.
  There are many examples to choose from to illustrate this point. Just 
last night, the Vice President had to come in and break a tie to 
protect huge corporations from the victims of the frauds they 
perpetuated. Now they are putting together a huge tax cut for the 
wealthiest people in our country, and they are trying to sell it as a 
raise for the middle class. In Hawaii, we call this shibai--or B.S.
  But there is perhaps no issue in which Donald Trump's dangerous 
agenda has caused more harm than his quest to deprive millions of 
Americans the healthcare and the health insurance they need. His first 
attempt at repealing the Affordable Care Act would have thrown as many 
as 30 million people off of their health insurance. Thanks to the 
combined efforts of so many people--active people, engaged people 
across the country--we defeated this proposal.
  A few months later, continuing the assault on healthcare, Donald 
Trump renewed his attack on our healthcare system under the so-called 
Graham-Cassidy bill. But once again, the combined outrage of millions 
kept the bill from coming to the floor.
  In the time they spent on their single-minded, unrelenting quest to 
repeal the Affordable Care Act, Donald Trump and Republicans in 
Congress have allowed authorization for the Children's Health Insurance 
Program, or CHIP, to lapse. Nearly 30,000 children in Hawaii and more 
than 9 million across the country depend on CHIP for their healthcare. 
You heard just now my colleague from Ohio tell you stories about the 
children in Ohio--children with asthma. In Hawaii, we have children 
with asthma, children with diabetes.

[[Page S6808]]

  Nearly 30,000 children in Hawaii who rely on CHIP for their 
healthcare are being affected by our inaction. Primarily covering 
children from low-income families who earn too much to qualify for 
Medicaid, CHIP provides critical and much needed care for children with 
complex medical conditions.
  Although existing funding has allowed States to stretch budgets to 
keep the program in place, money is quickly running out. If we don't 
take action soon, as many as 4 million children could lose their health 
insurance entirely--4 million children.
  Congress cannot and should not be complicit in what I would call 
gross negligence. It is not negligence; it is gross negligence.
  CHIP has traditionally enjoyed bipartisan support. In fact, it 
emerged from the committee with bipartisan support. I am glad Senators 
Wyden and Hatch have come together to create the KIDS Act, which I have 
cosponsored. This bill would extend CHIP's authorization and funding 
through 2022 and provide much needed certainty to millions of families 
across the country.
  If we brought this bill to the floor right now, it would pass. It 
would clearly have the votes to pass. The only question is, Why don't 
we do it? Why don't we provide healthcare to millions of children in 
our country, for Heaven's sake?
  I cannot believe that my colleagues on the other side of the aisle 
are afraid to risk incurring the wrath of a vengeful President. I 
cannot believe that is what is keeping them from doing the right thing.
  I encourage the majority leader to bring this bill to the floor for a 
vote as soon as possible.
  I yield the floor.
  I suggest the absence of a quorum.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will call the roll.
  The legislative clerk proceeded to call the roll.
  Mr. MARKEY. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the order for 
the quorum call be rescinded.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
  Mr. MARKEY. Mr. President, this summer the Children's Health 
Insurance Program, or CHIP, turned 20 years old.
  I served on the House committee that created this bill and was proud 
to support providing the affordable comprehensive health insurance to 
low-income children and pregnant women. It is a bipartisan program, and 
it is an effective program. Last year alone, CHIP covered nearly 9 
million children throughout the country. In Massachusetts, CHIP has 
been instrumental in achieving near-universal coverage for our children 
in the Bay State.
  Yet, instead of celebrating CHIP's successes over the last two 
decades, congressional Republicans have placed CHIP in programmatic 
purgatory. That is because they allowed CHIP to expire at the end of 
September. Instead of focusing on reauthorizing this critical 
healthcare lifeline, Republican leadership chose to waste months of 
time trying to repeal the Affordable Care Act. They let just one of 
these successful programs lapse while they tried unsuccessfully to end 
another. They were more interested in ripping healthcare coverage away 
from millions of Americans and taking a machete to Medicaid rather than 
protecting our Nation's children.
  We should not forget that CHIP stands on Medicaid's shoulders. Any 
fundamental changes to how Medicaid operates--whether it is block-
granting or capping the program--will hamstring CHIP's ability to serve 
children as effectively and efficiently as it was intended to do, but 
instead of immediately returning attention to ensuring that this lapsed 
deadline is not effective, House Republicans have further delayed 
action by inserting partisan policies to pay for the program. This has 
not only caused an unnecessary delay in passing a bill to reauthorize 
CHIP, but it has dragged CHIP onto the political game board, turning it 
and our children into pawns in their ruthless game of partisan chess.
  CHIP has historically been and should be above such games because 
CHIP is not just an insurance program, it is a reassurance program. It 
reassures States that they can provide comprehensive healthcare 
coverage to some of their most vulnerable, it reassures doctors that 
their patients will be able to access care and treatment, it reassures 
teachers that their students can be healthy enough to learn, and it 
reassures Mom and Dad that their children can still get well in the 
face of financial hardship.
  Continued inaction on CHIP is dangerous and damaging. Every day we 
delay reauthorizing CHIP is another day parents across the United 
States live in fear that their children may soon lose their health 
insurance. They panic at the thought of leaving their child's asthma 
untreated, skipping a trip to the dentist, or delaying a doctor's visit 
because they can't afford to pay for the treatment or medication that 
may be prescribed. If we don't act soon, this fear may become a 
terrible reality for families. In Massachusetts, CHIP funding will 
expire early next year. This could impact coverage for 160,000 children 
in the Commonwealth, potentially delaying access to treatment and 
services that could have ramifications into adulthood.
  In Congress, we are celebrating the 20th birthday of a successful 
children's insurance program by effectively threatening to end it. That 
is what Congress is now doing to the State of Massachusetts. That is 
what they are saying to the State of Massachusetts; that they are going 
to effectively try to shut down a program that for 20 years has served 
the children in our State. That makes no sense.
  I urge my Republican colleagues to put their partisan games aside to 
provide certainty and stability to States, to providers, and to 
reassure families by reauthorizing CHIP. When President Trump says he 
wants to make the healthcare system in America better, when President 
Trump says he wants to make sure families are able to take care of 
their children, we have a program that does that already. It is 
successful, and families and the States love it. All we need is 
Republicans in the Senate to work together in order to make sure that 
program continues for the health of all children in our country.
  I yield the floor.
  Mrs. FEINSTEIN. Mr. President, the Senate is currently considering 
the nomination of Scott Palk to a lifetime appointment as a Federal 
district court judge on the Western District of Oklahoma. I voted 
against Mr. Palk's nomination in the Judiciary Committee, and I will 
oppose his nomination on the floor.
  While his nomination was pending for a lifetime appointment to be a 
Federal judge, Mr. Palk changed his membership with the National Rifle 
Association to take out a life membership in the organization. When I 
asked Mr. Palk about this change, he asserted he expects to maintain 
this ``lifetime member'' status, even if he is confirmed, and he 
refused to commit to recuse himself from any cases where the National 
Rifle Association has taken a legal position.
  What I find disconcerting about this is Federal judges must be 
impartial. Federal judges must not have any appearance of conflicts of 
interest. When individuals come before a court, they need to trust that 
their case will be heard fairly and on the merits.
  Every American must believe that they will get a fair, unbiased 
hearing no matter who their judge is. Federal judges must follow 
applicable laws and regulations that severely limit the kinds of 
organizations they can participate in.
  For example, the code of conduct for Federal Judges says, ``[A] judge 
should not participate in extrajudicial activities that detract from 
the dignity of the judge's office, interfere with the performance of 
the judge's official duties, reflect adversely on the judge's 
impartiality, lead to frequent disqualification, or violate the 
limitations set forth below.''
  That is why members of the Senate Judiciary Committee often ask 
judicial nominees at their hearings what steps they will take to 
prepare for the bench. It is the committee's duty to determine whether 
a nominee is prepared to leave their former roles and personal beliefs 
at the door and instead serve in an impartial arbiter.
  In fact, when nominated for lifetime appointments, most nominees try 
to rid themselves of conflicts and limit their affiliations, especially 
with advocacy organizations. However, Mr. Palk not only chose to 
maintain his membership with the NRA, he chose to extend his membership 
for life.

[[Page S6809]]

  The fact that we are considering this nominee, given this issue with 
his background, just 3 weeks after the Las Vegas shooting, should 
really give us all a reason to pause. Las Vegas is now the deadliest 
mass shooting committed by an individual in the United States. It has 
only been a year since the Pulse Nightclub massacre in Orlando, which 
was previously the deadliest mass shooting in our Nation's history. It 
has been only 5 years since 20 6-year-olds and 6 adults were murdered 
at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, CT. What happened after 
each of those shootings?
  After Sandy Hook, the NRA opposed any legislation that would have 
restricted high-capacity magazines or military-style assault rifles.
  After the Pulse Nightclub shooting, the NRA opposed any legislation 
to expand background checks on gun buyers or to prevent gun sales to 
people on terrorist watch lists.
  After the Las Vegas shooting, the NRA, despite initial statements to 
the contrary, has come out opposed to any legislation to ban ``bump-
fire stocks,'' even though such devices allow guns to function as 
machineguns, which are already banned under the law.
  The NRA has never supported any commonsense gun legislation. The 
NRA's views on gun control issues could not be clearer, which is why it 
is so problematic that a judicial nominee chose to double-down on his 
NRA membership while his nomination was pending, rather than extricate 
himself from his prior commitments and then refuse to commit to 
recusing himself on cases where the NRA has made its views abundantly 
clear. This should trouble all of us.
  Our job in evaluating judicial nominees is to ensure our Federal 
courts are an independent part of our system of checks and balances. To 
do that, we need confidence that judicial nominees will safeguard their 
own impartiality. I think all of my colleagues feel that way.
  That is not what Mr. Palk has done. Instead of taking steps to 
separate himself from strong political views, he has proactively taken 
steps to increase his commitment to specific views of the law.
  I will vote against Mr. Palk's nomination and urge my colleagues to 
do the same.
  Mr. MARKEY. I suggest the absence of a quorum.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will call the roll.
  The bill clerk proceeded to call the roll.
  Mr. INHOFE. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the order for 
the quorum call be rescinded.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.