[Congressional Record Volume 163, Number 163 (Wednesday, October 11, 2017)]
[House]
[Pages H7950-H7951]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
RECIPIENTS OF WHISTLEBLOWER DISCLOSURES
Mr. RUSSELL. Mr. Speaker, I move to suspend the rules and pass the
bill (H.R. 2196) to amend title 5, United States Code, to allow
whistleblowers to disclose information to certain recipients, as
amended.
The Clerk read the title of the bill.
The text of the bill is as follows:
H.R. 2196
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of
the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. RECIPIENTS OF WHISTLEBLOWER DISLOSURES.
Section 2302(b)(8)(B) of title 5, United States Code, is
amended by striking ``or to the Inspector'' and all that
follows through ``such disclosures'' and inserting ``the
Inspector General of an agency, a supervisor in the
employee's direct chain of command and up to and including
the head of the employing agency, or to an employee
designated by any of the aforementioned individuals for the
purpose of receiving such disclosures''.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursuant to the rule, the gentleman from
Oklahoma (Mr. Russell) and the gentlewoman from the District of
Columbia (Ms. Norton) each will control 20 minutes.
The Chair recognizes the gentleman from Oklahoma.
General Leave
Mr. RUSSELL. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent that all Members
may have 5 legislative days in which to revise and extend their remarks
and include extraneous material on the bill under consideration.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there objection to the request of the
gentleman from Oklahoma?
There was no objection.
Mr. RUSSELL. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume.
Mr. Speaker, I speak in support of H.R. 2196, a bill I introduced
with Ranking Member Cummings, Mr. Lynch, and Mr. Farenthold from Texas
earlier this year to allow whistleblowers to disclose information to
certain recipients.
Whistleblowers in the Federal Government should be able to tell their
supervisors when something is wrong. That is true no matter what, but
especially so in cases involving classified information, which implies
a matter of national security.
If whistleblowers cannot make a protected disclosure to their
supervisors, they are more likely to make an illegal disclosure to
people or entities without the proper security clearances.
Under current law, whistleblowers in the intelligence community can
make protected disclosures to their supervisors. However,
whistleblowers dealing with classified information outside the
intelligence community do not have that same protection.
Federal employees inside the intelligence community can blow the
whistle to their supervisors, to the appropriate inspector general, and
to Congress. Employees outside the intelligence community do not have
those protections when it comes to classified information, and they
have fewer options when it comes to blowing the whistle, except to put
it in the hands of those who have no clearances.
Federal employees outside the intelligence community must be
reassured that they can report wrongdoing to the appropriate people,
including their supervisors. With this protection, whistleblowers will
be less likely to disclose potentially sensitive information on waste,
fraud, and abuse to the media, or other entities or individuals without
the proper security clearance.
This bill allows whistleblowers to make protected disclosures of
classified information to individuals within their chain of command.
There are very few conceivable circumstances in which a whistleblower
complaint to a supervisor would jeopardize national security, but such
disclosures are not currently protected, as strange as that may seem.
There is no reasonable basis for concern about giving whistleblowers
throughout the Federal Government the right to contact those
individuals about waste, fraud, or abuse of a classified nature. These
additional protections will make it easier for these employees to do
the responsible thing when it comes to classified disclosures.
Mr. Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time.
Ms. NORTON. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume.
I want to thank Representative Steve Russell for introducing this
bill, along with Oversight and Government Reform Committee Ranking
Member Elijah Cummings, and Representative Stephen Lynch.
This bill would provide important protections to whistleblowers who
handle classified information and want to report waste, fraud, and
abuse.
Under this bill, an employee who is covered by the Whistleblower
Protection Act could disclose to any supervisor in his or her direct
chain of command classified information the employee reasonably
believes shows wrongdoing.
Under current law, if a whistleblower discloses classified
information, the whistleblower is protected only if he or she makes
those disclosures to the Office of Special Counsel, an inspector
general, the head of the whistleblower's agency, or an employee
designated by the head of the agency.
This bill would encourage employees who handle classified information
to use proper channels to blow the whistle on waste, fraud, and abuse.
Allowing employees to go to a supervisor with evidence of wrongdoing
may be less intimidating than going to the agency head or an inspector
general.
[[Page H7951]]
This bill is modeled on language in the Presidential Policy Directive
issued in 2012. That directive, PPD 19, provided whistleblower
protections to intelligence community employees who are not covered by
the Whistleblower Protection Act.
{time} 1530
This bill will provide a more consistent approach for employees who
handle classified information by ensuring that employees who are
covered by the Whistleblower Protection Act will blow that whistle to a
supervisor, the same way that intelligence community employees who are
covered by PPD 19 can do so.
This is a good bill. I urge my colleagues to support it, and I yield
back the balance of my time.
Mr. RUSSELL. Mr. Speaker, I would like to thank Ranking Member
Cummings, Mr. Farenthold of Texas, and Mr. Lynch of Massachusetts for
their great bipartisan support in this needed reform, and I urge my
colleagues to support my bill.
Mr. Speaker, I yield back the balance of my time.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. The question is on the motion offered by the
gentleman from Oklahoma (Mr. Russell) that the House suspend the rules
and pass the bill, H.R. 2196, as amended.
The question was taken; and (two-thirds being in the affirmative) the
rules were suspended and the bill, as amended, was passed.
A motion to reconsider was laid on the table.
____________________