[Congressional Record Volume 163, Number 156 (Thursday, September 28, 2017)]
[Senate]
[Pages S6208-S6209]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
Stop Enabling Sex Traffickers Act
Mr. President, I rise to talk about something different today,
something equally urgent and concerning. It has to do with legislation
that is present here in the U.S. Senate and in the House of
Representatives. It is about an issue called sex trafficking--human
trafficking. It is a crime against humanity. It is a human rights issue
that really transcends partisanship and transcends politics.
Every day that we aren't acting here to help push back against this,
countless vulnerable women and children are suffering. I personally
think it is a stain on our national character that sex trafficking is
increasing in this country, in this century, at this time. Experts tell
us that it is increasing because of the internet. So the internet,
which has so many positive aspects, also has a dark side. One is the
selling of children and women online with ruthless efficiency.
I appreciated the Senate Commerce Committee holding a hearing last
week on bipartisan legislation called the Stop Enabling Sex Traffickers
Act. I appreciated the opportunity to testify in support of this
legislation at that hearing. But, actually, the most powerful testimony
by far came from a mom. Her name is Yvonne Ambrose. Yvonne received a
call on Christmas Eve that every parent dreads. As a dad of three kids,
I can't imagine. Her 16-year-old daughter, Desiree, was murdered while
being exploited and sold for sex on backpage.com, the industry leader
in the online sex trafficking of minors.
A 16-year-old girl should never have been trafficked online, but the
tragedy of her death is compounded by the fact that backpage.com, the
website she was bought and sold on, has repeatedly evaded justice for
its role in child sex trafficking.
We know from the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children
that backpage alone is responsible for most child trafficking. In fact,
75 percent of all child trafficking reports the organization receives
from the public have to do with backpage.com. We know from a nearly 2-
year investigation by the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on
Investigations, which I chair, that backpage actively and knowingly
facilitated online sex trafficking, coached its users on how to post
so-called clean ads for illegal transactions, and knowingly edited ads
to conceal evidence of crimes, including the concealed evidence of
underage girls being sold online.
Despite these facts, which are horrendous, courts have consistently
ruled that a Federal law called the Communications Decency Act protects
backpage from its liability for its role in sex trafficking. This law
is 21 years old. It shields websites from liability for crimes others
commit through their site. It was enacted when the internet was in its
infancy. It was intended, by the way, in part to protect children from
indecent material on the internet. Now it is protecting websites that
sell women and children for sex.
This was never Congress's intention when enacting the Communications
Decency Act. In fact, last week, California's attorney general, Xavier
Becerra, testified at the Senate hearing I talked about. He was a
Congressman in 1996 when the law was enacted. In discussing the
Communications Decency Act, he said: ``I don't remember in 1996
believing my `yes' vote meant I was going to allow, 21 years later, for
kids to be sold through the internet for sex.''
Congress clearly did not intend for this broad immunity to occur, but
courts have made it clear their hands are tied because of legal
precedent and have invited the Congress to fix this injustice.
Just last month, a Sacramento judge made the most blatant call on
Congress yet. The court threw out pimping charges against backpage.com
because of the liability protections provided to the website under
Federal law. The court opinion stated: ``If and until Congress sees fit
to amend the immunity law, the broad reach of section 230 of the
Communications Decency Act even applies to those alleged to support the
exploitation of others by human trafficking.''
Because of this interpretation of the law over the last 20 years,
only Congress can fix this injustice. Again, that is why I introduced
the bipartisan Stop Enabling Sex Traffickers Act.
Along with coauthors Senators Blumenthal, McCain, McCaskill, Cornyn,
and Heitkamp, we are determined to get this bill passed to make a
difference in the lives of countless women and children who have been
exploited by online sex traffickers.
Last week's hearing was a great positive step in that direction. We
had bipartisan support in the hearing, and I hope that after the
hearing, we can move quickly to a markup. I thank Senator Thune, who
was on the floor earlier--chairman of the committee--for his leadership
in this area.
The bill would do two things. They are both very targeted and narrow.
One, it would allow sex trafficking victims to get the justice they
deserve against websites that knowingly facilitate crimes against them.
Second, it would allow State and local law enforcement to prosecute
websites that violate Federal sex trafficking laws, again, with the
knowing standard.
This standard of knowing is a high bar to meet. Websites would have
to be proven to knowingly facilitate, support, or assist online sex
trafficking to be liable. Because the standard is so high, our bill
protects good technology companies--good actors--and targets rogue
online traffickers like backpage. Our bill also preserves the Good
Samaritan provision in the Communications Decency Act, which protects
the actors that proactively screen their websites for offensive
material.
These are commonsense updates to bring a 21-year-old statute into the
21st century.
This bill has received wide bipartisan support. Thirty-three Senators
have supported it, one-third of the entire U.S. Senate as cosponsors.
We also have the support of dozens of anti-human trafficking groups in
all of our States, faith-based groups from around the country, law
enforcement groups, all the national law enforcement groups, including
the attorneys general, the groups out there that actually are involved
in these prosecutions. They have all publicly endorsed this
legislation.
Some significant players in the tech and business community have also
stepped up to support it. Recently, Oracle endorsed the legislation,
also 21st
[[Page S6209]]
Century Fox, Hewlett-Packard Enterprise, Walt Disney Company, and
others have supported our narrowly crafted legislation because they
know it is necessary, it is needed, and it doesn't affect the good
actors.
I would love to see others in the tech community step forward and
help us. We want them to partner with us in this. They should be as
concerned as anyone, if not more, because online, on the internet, this
is taking place. They should want to support, address this injustice,
where traffickers exploit women and children with immunity.
Some in the tech community have argued this bill would inadvertently
harm good-intentioned websites. I don't believe that is true, but, more
importantly, nor do legal scholars who have looked at this.
Attorney General Xavier Becerra explained in last week's hearing that
``we have to prove criminal intent. We can't win a prosecution unless
we can show that the individuals we're prosecuting, like Backpage, had
the intent--the knowledge--to do what they are doing. The legislation
that you have before you is very narrowly tailored. It goes only after
sex trafficking.''
That was our intent, to do it narrowly. The bill targets websites
that knowingly facilitate sex trafficking and protects those that
don't. It is as simple as that. I think those in the tech community who
remain in opposition to this legislation have to realize that by doing
so, they are protecting these bad actors, bringing a bad name to the
internet. Instead, they should partner with us to protect our kids.
I have spoken about courts and attorneys general calling on Congress
to change the Communications Decency Act. The most powerful call on
Congress actually came at the Senate hearing last week--not from a
lawyer, not from a judge. It came from a mom.
Yvonne Ambrose, whom I mentioned earlier, the mother of the late 16-
year-old, Desiree Robinson, with great courage, stated:
Backpage.com and other companies like it must be held
responsible for what they have created. I'm sure when this
act was put in place in [19]96, the Internet was in its
infancy, and it was not intended to allow companies to
legally sell children on the internet. But somehow, a dollar
has become more important than a human life. If you're going
to fix this problem, fix it.
Let's fix it. Last week's Senate hearing was a step in the right
direction. Senators from both sides of the aisle understood the
injustice that occurs and were passionate in expressing their desire to
find a solution. I would just tell you that we have very carefully
assessed this problem over the last couple of years, carefully and
thoughtfully not just assessed it but looked for a legislative fix that
would be a solution to the problems we have identified. We now need to
act on it as soon as possible to save those women and children who are
being trafficked online every day as we wait.
The Stop Enabling Sex Traffickers Act stops an injustice. I urge the
Senate to take up this legislation, seize this opportunity, have the
markup, get it to the floor, get it to the House where there is
companion legislation, and fix this problem to protect our kids.
Thank you.
I yield back.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from Maryland.
Mr. CARDIN. Mr. President, first, I want to compliment Senator
Portman for his leadership on this issue of ending modern-day slavery
and trafficking. The United States is taking the leadership globally in
fighting trafficking.
We had the Trafficking in Persons Report that is looked upon as being
the most authoritative document on how well every country is doing in
fighting modern-day slavery and trafficking, but we must make sure we
take care of issues here at home.
I applaud Senator Portman's efforts to make sure we do everything in
this country we can to protect those victims who are being trafficked
for sex or labor. We need to redouble our efforts. I compliment my
colleague for his leadership in this area. I can tell him that all of
us here want to work with him to make sure America continues to lead in
our fight to end modern-day slavery.