[Congressional Record Volume 163, Number 154 (Tuesday, September 26, 2017)]
[Senate]
[Pages S6157-S6158]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
EPA PROPOSAL ON BIODIESEL
Mr. GRASSLEY. Mr. President, I come to the floor because I am very
disturbed about some actions coming out of EPA affecting biofuels and
contrary to what the President promised. In other words, I think people
working for the President aren't following the President's direction.
As my colleagues know well, I have championed renewable fuels and
other energies for a long period of time. I have worked hard to enact
policies to encourage the growth of renewable electricity from sources
such as wind and solar. The same is true for biofuels. I have pursued
policies to grow our country's production of renewable fuels, such as
conventional corn ethanol, biodiesel, and cellulosic ethanol. I support
renewable energy because it is good for the economy. It is good for our
national security. It is good for our balance of trade. It is good for
the rural economies, and it is good for energy independence.
I was pleased that in the most recent Presidential election, then
Candidate Trump--now our President--made clear his support for ethanol
and the renewable fuels standard. He said clearly: ``We are going to
protect the Renewable Fuels Standard.''
On another occasion, Candidate Trump recognized the benefits of the
industry when he said this at an ethanol biorefinery:
Amazing what you've been able to do--amazing. And it's
great for the country and
[[Page S6158]]
the investment is great. Beyond even the product, the
investment and the jobs and everything else are great for the
country.
Finally, at a summit focusing on renewable fuels in Iowa, as a
candidate in January of 2016, Mr. Trump said this:
The RFS, which is Renewable Fuel Standard, is an important
tool in the mission to achieve energy independence to the
United States. I will do all that is in my power as President
to achieve that goal. . . . As President, I will encourage
Congress to be cautious in attempting to charge and change
any part of the RFS. . . . Energy independence is a
requirement of America to become great again.
Candidate Trump continued:
My theme is `Make America Great Again.' It's an important
part of it. The EPA should ensure that biofuel RVOs, or blend
levels, match the statutory level set by Congress under the
RFS.
These are, in fact, very strong words and went over well with farmers
and alternative energy people in my State and throughout the country,
and I am glad he said them. After years of delay and uncertainty from
the previous administration, Iowans are very grateful to hear such
determination and conviction from Candidate Trump, now President Trump.
I was somewhat cautious early on when the President named a few
members of his Cabinet who were from oil-producing States. Fearful of
Big Oil's opposition to biofuels and then concerned about whether the
President would keep his promise, I, along with a number of my Senate
colleagues, held a meeting in my office with the nominees for Director
of EPA and Secretary of Energy, among others. We expressed to those
nominees our support for biofuels and renewable energy and the benefits
of strong biofuels policies. One by one, these nominees assured us of
their support because they were made well aware of President Trump's
support by the President himself. They told us that they knew who was
boss, and they knew the President supported the Renewable Fuel
Standard.
About a month ago, the President called me. I was traveling to
Northwest Iowa for my town meetings. He called me. We talked on the
cellphone for maybe a couple of minutes. He was somewhat worried--
although he didn't say why he was worried--that people might be
questioning whether he still supported ethanol and other biofuels. He
made very clear to me that he supports renewable fuels and that he will
keep his word on the Renewable Fuel Standard. He said he wanted me to
tell that to the people of Iowa.
There are a lot of ways you can tell the people of Iowa, but one of
the ways I did what he asked is I tweeted it to the 140,000 people who
are on my Twitter feed. I have done what he asked me to do.
Here we are today. You can imagine my surprise this very day when I
saw that President Trump's EPA has released a proposal out of the blue
to reduce the volume requirements for biodiesel for 2018 and 2019 under
the Renewable Fuel Standard. That is the RFS.
This action today has come out of nowhere. The EPA just released a
proposal in July to set blending levels for biodiesel. It did not touch
the 2018 level, which was already finalized at 2.1 billion gallons. The
July proposal would keep the 2019 levels steady at 2.1 billion gallons.
This is what happened today, which I have already referred to.
Today's announcement proposes to reduce both levels, contrary to what
the President had said that he was supporting. It is outrageous that
the EPA would change course and propose a reduction in renewable fuel
volumes in this particular way. This seems like a bait and switch from
the EPA's prior proposal and from assurances from President Trump
himself and from those Cabinet Secretaries who came to my office to
assure us of their support for the RFS.
Reducing volumes as the EPA proposes would undermine renewable fuel
production. That is contrary to the worthwhile goal of America first.
It will undermine U.S. workers and harm the U.S. economy, particularly
in rural America. It is contrary to the goal of meeting the country's
fuel needs through domestic production, which is critical to job
creation and economic growth.
This all gives me a strong suspicion that big oil companies and big
oil refineries are prevailing once again in this Trump EPA, as they did
in the Obama administration, despite assurances to the contrary that I
have received from this administration.
You can bet that I plan to press the administration to drop this
terrible plan. I hope the officials working for the President will keep
the President's word, so I will make sure that EPA hears loud and clear
the impact the EPA's proposal will have on Iowa's corn and soybean
farmers and the biofuel producers in my State and all the jobs
connected with it. That is not a way to make America strong once again.
I yield the floor.
____________________