[Congressional Record Volume 163, Number 127 (Thursday, July 27, 2017)]
[Senate]
[Page S4589]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

  SA 695. Mr. BOOKER (for himself, Mrs. Capito, Mr. Blumenthal, Mr. 
Portman, and Mr. Peters) submitted an amendment intended to be proposed 
by him to the bill H.R. 2810, to authorize appropriations for fiscal 
year 2018 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for 
military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of 
Energy, to prescribe military personnel strengths for such fiscal year, 
and for other purposes; which was ordered to lie on the table; as 
follows:

       At the end of subtitle G of title X, add the following:

     SEC. ___. SHARK FIN TRADE ELIMINATION.

       (a) Findings.--Congress finds the following:
       (1) Sharks are critically important species for their 
     economic, cultural, and ecosystem value.
       (2) Many shark populations are in peril worldwide and are 
     on the decline.
       (3) One of the greatest threats to sharks is the global 
     trade in shark fins. It is estimated that fins from as many 
     as 73,000,000 sharks end up in the global shark fin trade 
     every year.
       (4) Shark fins have no medicinal or nutritional value.
       (5) The trade in shark fins is primarily focused on large 
     coastal and pelagic species that grow slowly, mature late, 
     and have low reproduction rates.
       (6) Shark fins are often removed and retained while the 
     remainder of a shark is discarded due to the high market 
     value of shark fins relative to other parts of a shark.
       (7) Shark fins are removed primarily to be commercialized 
     as a fungible commodity.
       (8) Shark finning is the cruel practice in which the fins 
     of a shark are cut off on board a fishing vessel at sea. The 
     remainder of the animal is then thrown back into the water to 
     drown, starve, or die a slow death.
       (9) Although the United States has banned the practice of 
     shark finning aboard vessels in waters controlled by the 
     United States, there is no Federal ban on the removal and 
     sale of shark fins once the fin is brought ashore.
       (10) Once a shark fin is detached from the body, it becomes 
     impossible to determine whether the shark was legally caught 
     or the fin lawfully removed.
       (11) It is difficult to determine which species of shark a 
     fin was removed from, which is problematic because some 
     species are threatened with extinction.
       (12) The States of Texas, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, 
     Massachusetts, Maryland, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, 
     California, and Washington and American Samoa, Guam, and the 
     North Mariana Islands have implemented bans on the sale of 
     shark fins.
       (13) Shark fins possessed, transported, offered for sale, 
     sold, or purchased anywhere in the United States are part of 
     a large international market, having a substantial and direct 
     effect on interstate commerce.
       (14) Abolition of the shark fin trade in the United States 
     will remove the United States from the global shark fin 
     market and will put the United States in a stronger position 
     to advocate internationally for abolishing the shark fin 
     trade in other countries.
       (b) Prohibition on Sale of Shark Fins.--
       (1) Prohibition.--Except as provided in subsection (c), no 
     person shall possess, transport, offer for sale, sell, or 
     purchase shark fins or products containing shark fins.
       (2) Penalty.--A violation of paragraph (1) shall be treated 
     as an act prohibited by section 307 of the Magnuson-Stevens 
     Fishery Conservation and Management Act (16 U.S.C. 1857) and 
     shall be penalized pursuant to section 308(a) of that Act (16 
     U.S.C. 1858(a)), except that the maximum civil penalty for 
     each violation shall be $100,000, or the fair market value of 
     the shark fins involved, whichever is greater.
       (c) Exceptions.--A person may possess a shark fin that was 
     taken lawfully under a State, territorial, or Federal license 
     or permit to take or land sharks, if the shark fin is 
     separated from the shark in a manner consistent with the 
     license or permit and is--
       (1) destroyed or discarded upon separation;
       (2) used for noncommercial subsistence purposes in 
     accordance with State or territorial law;
       (3) used solely for display or research purposes by a 
     museum, college, or university, or other person under a State 
     or Federal permit to conduct noncommercial scientific 
     research; or
       (4) retained by the license or permit holder for a 
     noncommercial purpose.
       (d) Dogfish.--
       (1) In general.--It shall not be a violation of subsection 
     (b) for any person to possess, transport, offer for sale, 
     sell, or purchase any fresh or frozen raw fin or tail from 
     any stock of the species Mustelus canis (smooth dogfish) or 
     Squalus acanthias (spiny dogfish).
       (2) Report.--By not later than January 1, 2027, the 
     Secretary of Commerce shall review the exemption contained in 
     paragraph (1) and shall prepare and submit to Congress a 
     report that includes a recommendation on whether the 
     exemption contained in paragraph (1) should continue or be 
     terminated. In preparing such report and making such 
     recommendation, the Secretary shall analyze factors 
     including--
       (A) the economic viability of dogfish fisheries with and 
     without the continuation of the exemption;
       (B) the impact to ocean ecosystems of continuing or 
     terminating the exemption;
       (C) the impact on enforcement of the ban contained in 
     subsection (b) caused by the exemption; and
       (D) the impact of the exemption on shark conservation.
       (e) Definition of Shark Fin.--In this section, the term 
     ``shark fin'' means--
       (1) the raw or dried or otherwise processed detached fin of 
     a shark; or
       (2) the raw or dried or otherwise processed detached tail 
     of a shark.
       (f) State Authority.--Nothing in this section may be 
     construed to preclude, deny, or limit any right of a State or 
     territory to adopt or enforce any regulation or standard that 
     is more stringent than a regulation or standard in effect 
     under this section.
       (g) Severability.--If any provision of this section or its 
     application to any person or circumstance is held invalid, 
     the invalidity does not affect other provisions or 
     applications of this section which can be given effect 
     without the invalid provision or application, and to this end 
     the provisions of this section are severable.
                                 ______