[Congressional Record Volume 163, Number 123 (Thursday, July 20, 2017)]
[Senate]
[Page S4090]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
Healthcare
Mr. President, I also share Leader Schumer's remarks and concerns
about the current status of the healthcare bill as we understand it.
I urge my colleagues on the other side of the aisle to vote down the
motion to proceed so that we can have regular order and so that we can
hear from stakeholders and the American people about how changes in
healthcare would impact them and what ideas they have for us to be able
to lower costs and make sure that all Americans have access to truly
affordable, high-quality care.
Mr. President, I also rise to oppose the nomination of Attorney John
K. Bush to serve on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.
An independent and impartial judiciary is critical to our democracy
and to our march toward progress. Our Founders established our court
system to serve as an independent arbiter that would protect the rights
of every American and ensure equal justice under our laws.
Unfortunately, it is clear that Mr. Bush lacks the impartiality and
commitment to equal justice for every American that is needed to
qualify for a lifetime appointment on the Sixth Circuit Court of
Appeals.
President Trump's nomination of Mr. Bush represents yet another
attempt by this administration to undermine the rights of American
women to make their own healthcare decisions and to control their own
destinies. To fully participate not only in our economy but also in our
democracy, women must be recognized for their capacity to make their
own healthcare decisions, just as men are, and they must have the full
independence to do so, just as men do. Mr. Bush has made it clear that
he fundamentally disagrees with that principle and that he does not
support a woman's constitutionally protected right to have a safe and
legal abortion. Hiding behind a pseudonym on an online blog, Mr. Bush
has gone so far as to compare a woman's right to make her own
reproductive health decisions to slavery, saying they are ``the two
greatest tragedies in our country.'' The fact that someone nominated
for the bench would believe something like this is nothing short of
appalling.
Mr. Bush has also criticized essential programs that women and their
families depend on, referring to programs like the Women, Infants, and
Children Program--otherwise known as WIC--and grants to combat violence
against women as ``wasteful.''
I also have real concerns with Mr. Bush's record when it comes to the
rights of LGBTQ Americans. Mr. Bush has made clear that he is
vehemently opposed to marriage equality, calling it a ``no-compromise''
position. In 2011, he criticized the State Department for an
announcement that led to more equal treatment of same-sex parents, and
he has even used an offensive, anti-gay slur in a quote that he chose
to use in public remarks.
Mr. Bush's deeply offensive public statements and his record indicate
that he is an individual who is focused on extreme partisanship and who
does not recognize the basic equality of all Americans. His statements
and his actions tell us that he is not committed to the concept of
equal justice under our laws. This is unacceptable for someone seeking
a lifetime appointment to a job that requires sound judgment,
objectivity, and, more than anything else, an essential commitment to
fairness.
I will oppose Mr. Bush's nomination to the Sixth Circuit Court of
Appeals, and I urge my colleagues to do the same.
Thank you, Mr. President.
I suggest the absence of a quorum.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will call the roll.
The legislative clerk proceeded to call the roll.
Mr. WHITEHOUSE. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the order
for the quorum call be rescinded.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
Mr. WHITEHOUSE. I ask unanimous consent to be allowed to speak as in
morning business for up to 15 minutes.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.