[Congressional Record Volume 163, Number 117 (Wednesday, July 12, 2017)]
[Senate]
[Pages S3952-S3953]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
Calling for the Release of Liu Xiaobo
Mr. CRUZ. Mr. President, I stand here today on behalf of a hero of
freedom and democracy in the People's Republic of China. Liu Xiaobo and
his wife Liu Xia are the faces of liberty in China. They have
sacrificed comfort and normalcy to chart a path toward political
liberalization. For that, they have been detained, imprisoned, and
abused.
In 2008, Liu Xiaobo coauthored ``Charter 08,'' a manifesto that
shined a light on the Communist Party of China and its totalitarian
abuse of power. Though many brave souls signed their names and their
fates to that document, Dr. Liu's name was at the very top. For this
reason, he received the Nobel Peace Prize. He also received charges of
``inciting subversion of state power'' and an 11-year prison sentence.
It is impossible to neglect the stark irony: a man dedicated to
nonviolence, imprisoned for promoting peace.
Motivating Dr. Liu's tremendous courage and self-sacrifice was a
determination to remember what the People's Republic of China
desperately wants the world to forget: Tiananmen Square. A poet,
author, and political scientist, Dr. Liu was, in 1989, a visiting
scholar at Columbia University, but when the pro-democracy protests
broke out in Beijing in June of that year, he raced back to China to
support them. He staged a hunger strike in Tiananmen Square in the
midst of the historic student protests and insisted that they would
remain nonviolent in the faces of the tanks, which the Chinese military
deployed to smash them.
In 1996, the party subjected him to 3 years of ``reeducation through
labor'' for continuing to question China's one-party system.
In 2008, on the eve of the 100-year anniversary of China's first
Constitution and the 30-year anniversary of Beijing's Democracy Wall
movement, Dr. Liu dedicated his work on ``Charter 08'' to the martyrs
at Tiananmen Square.
Today, 8 years into his unjust imprisonment, Dr. Liu needs our help
more than ever. Last month, it was revealed that Dr. Liu has contracted
an aggressive, late stage form of liver cancer. Although PRC
authorities ``released'' him ``on medical parole,'' both Liu Xiaobo and
Liu Xia linger without freedom. Even worse, Liu Xiaobo is dying.
[[Page S3953]]
His condition is critical, and we are running out of time to act on his
behalf.
Although Chinese authorities compelled the Lius to sign an affidavit
allegedly attesting to their satisfaction with the medical care they
have received in China and their wish to remain there, Liu Xia has
communicated to their attorney their desire to spend Liu Xiaobo's final
days in America. PRC doctors insisted that Dr. Liu was too ill to
travel, but medical experts from the United States and Germany--one of
them being Dr. Joseph Herman of the MD Anderson Cancer Center of the
University of Texas--visited Dr. Liu and attested to the contrary.
Issuing a joint statement, they agreed that Dr. Liu ``can be safely
transported with appropriate medical evacuation care and support.''
They then issued this stark warning: ``However, the medical evacuation
would have to take place as quickly as possible.''
The urgency of this situation goes beyond Liu Xiaobo. Liu Xia's
livelihood is inextricably linked to the ability of the two of them to
leave China. Due to his imprisonment, Liu Xiaobo has been unable to
receive his $1.5 million in prize money from the Norwegian Nobel
Committee. The holdup of transferring the funds is merely routine: a
signed form from Dr. Liu and an open bank account with his name on it.
But China has prevented these technical steps from progressing. If Liu
Xiaobo dies without receiving this account, Liu Xia will be left
destitute with no money. I shudder to think what a life would hold for
the wife of China's boldest political prisoner.
Only one man stands between a dying man's wish and his wife's
livelihood and freedom: Xi Jinping. Although no one action can undo the
turmoil that the Lius have suffered over the past 28 years, it is not
too late to do the right thing and to allow this man and his wife to
spend their last days together according to their wishes.
It wouldn't be the first time that Xi has made a similar decision.
Earlier this year, he agreed, after consultations with the Trump
administration, to release an imprisoned Houstonian, Sandy Phan-Gillis,
who was incarcerated on false charges. Although nothing could bring
back the 2 years of separation from her family, she and her family are
now reunited--something I spent considerable time urging and
encouraging and was grateful to see come to pass.
Lest Xi forget, even Kim Jong Un, the dictator in North Korea,
allowed Otto Warmbier, a young American college student from Ohio--in
the prime of his life before torture and abuse left him in a coma--to
return home for his final hours. Surely, Xi can show the same degree of
humanity shown by Kim Jong Un.
Indeed, toward that end, the bill that I have introduced numerous
times to rename the street in front of the Chinese Embassy in honor of
Liu Xiaobo is an instrument of leverage that can help produce his
freedom. In 2015, I came to this floor and asked on three separate
occasions for unanimous consent to pass my bill to rename the street in
front of the Chinese Embassy after Liu Xiaobo. Over and over again,
sadly, Democratic Senators stood up and objected, stymieing the effort.
Each time I advocated on behalf of Liu Xiaobo and Liu Xia, my
colleagues expressed procedural concerns: This is counterproductive.
Doing so will only antagonize China.
Well, some of us are less concerned about antagonizing Chinese
Communist dictators.
My fellow Senators assured me that they have negotiated the release
of many political prisoners behind the scenes. Well, that is wonderful,
and I encourage them to do so now in the few days and weeks Liu Xiaobo
has ahead.
Even so, despite repeated Democratic objections--repeated Democratic
obstructionism--ultimately, the U.S. Senate was able to pass my bill by
voice vote in the 114th Congress, and the reason at the time was
evident: China's stubbornness--wrongly imprisoning a Nobel Peace
laureate--required public action to force the issue. The end goal
should be clear. It is not merely to rename a street, but rather to use
the action to shine light on the Lius and to pressure the PRC to do the
right thing.
No Member can explain the success of this tactic better than my good
friend Senator Grassley, the senior Senator from Iowa, who led a very
similar effort in 1984 to rename the street in front of the Soviet
Embassy after Andrei Sakharov, the famed Soviet dissident. Senator
Grassley led that effort under Ronald Reagan, and when the street was
renamed, it meant anytime a Soviet had to write to their Embassy, they
had to write Sakharov's name. It meant anytime you had to pick up the
phone and call the Embassy and say ``Where exactly do I find this
Embassy?'' they had to address and highlight the dissident.
For the PRC, they do not want to highlight Liu Xiaobo because he is a
powerful voice for freedom and against tyranny. Just as it worked
against the Soviet Union, as Reagan demonstrated, public shaming,
shining light, telling the truth can bring down the machinery of
oppression. So, too, can public shaming--shining light--secure Dr.
Liu's freedom.
As we stand here today, we don't know if Xi is going to allow Dr. Liu
to come to freedom, to live out his last days in peace, and to receive
the Nobel Peace Prize that he was so justly awarded. If Xi does the
right thing, we can all commend the action. But if not, I am announcing
my intention to continue to press this bill, to seek its passage again
in this Congress, just as the Senate passed it in the prior Congress. I
intend to press forward and seek passage of this bill.
If Dr. Liu is not released--if he dies in China, still under their
oppression--I intend to continue to fight until the day when the street
is named in front of the Embassy and the Chinese Communists can bow
their heads in shame at their injustice. If they don't want to be
publicly shamed, there is an easy path: Don't commit shameful acts.
Truth has power. Sunshine and light have power.
I urge my colleagues on both sides of the aisle--Republicans and
Democrats: If there is an issue that should unite us all, it is that a
Nobel Peace laureate speaking out for peace and democracy should not be
wrongly imprisoned in Communist China. That should bring us together--
and the full force of the United States.
I commend President Trump for leading on this issue, and I am hopeful
that China will see its way to doing the right thing.
I yield the floor.
I suggest the absence of a quorum.
The PRESIDING OFFICER (Mr. Tillis). The clerk will call the roll.
The bill clerk proceeded to call the roll.
Mr. McCAIN. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the order for
the quorum call be rescinded.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.