[Congressional Record Volume 163, Number 106 (Wednesday, June 21, 2017)]
[Senate]
[Page S3688]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
By Mr. REED (for himself, Mr. Brown, Mr. Tester, Mr. Blumenthal,
Mr. Kaine, Ms. Duckworth, Ms. Warren, Ms. Baldwin, Mr. Franken,
Ms. Klobuchar, Ms. Cortez Masto, Mr. Van Hollen, Mr. Menendez,
Ms. Hirono, and Mr. Durbin):
S. 1389. A bill to allow the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection
to provide greater protection to servicemembers; to the Committee on
Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Mr. REED. Mr. President, today, along with Senators Brown, Tester,
Blumenthal, Kaine, Duckworth, Warren, Baldwin, Franken, Klobuchar,
Cortez Masto, Van Hollen, and Menendez, I am reintroducing the Military
Consumer Enforcement Act to further strengthen consumer protections for
service members.
Our Nation has a strong tradition of working to protect our service
members while they sacrifice to keep our Nation, safe. Building on
these efforts, Congress passed the Soldiers' and Sailor's Civil Relief
Act in 1940 to provide essential financial protections for service
members to ``enable such persons to devote their entire energy to the
defense needs of the Nation.'' Now called the Servicemembers Civil
Relief Act (SCRA), this law provides such protections as prohibiting
the eviction of service members and their dependents from rental or
mortgaged properties and capping the interest at 6% on debts incurred
prior to an individual entering active duty military service.
Despite the importance of the SCRA's protections to our service
members, enforcement of this critical law has been inconsistent and
subject to the discretion of our financial regulators. For example,
according to a July 2012 report from the Government Accountability
Office, the estimated percentage of depository institutions that
serviced mortgages that were examined for SCRA compliance varied by
year between 2007 through 2011 at a rate of 4% in 2007, 17% in 2008,
18% in 2009, 26% in 2010, and 15% in 2011. Without a change in the law,
SCRA enforcement will continue to be subject to the changing priorities
of the financial regulators, which can also change with each newly
elected President. Simply put, prioritizing the consumer protection of
our service members should not be discretionary; it should be
mandatory. Our legislation ensures that SCRA enforcement will be a
permanent priority for the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, CFPB,
which Congress created to enforce Federal consumer financial protection
laws.
In 2010, as we debated the authorizing legislation for the CFPB, I
led the bipartisan effort to ensure the CFPB would play a key role in
protecting service members through the establishment of an Office of
Servicemember Affairs, OSA. Since that time, the CFPB, through its
enforcement actions, has helped service members recover approximately
$130 million in relief from unscrupulous actors in the financial
marketplace and through the OSA's monitoring of complaints, the CFPB
has helped other regulators provide more than $60 million in relief for
more than 78,000 service members harmed by SCRA violations. Imagine how
much more the CFPB could do for our service members if it could do more
than just refer potential SCRA violations to other regulators and
educate service members about their SCRA rights. With this demonstrated
record of success in protecting our service members, the CFPB should be
empowered, as it would be under this legislation, to enforce certain
key SCRA provisions, such as the protections against default judgments
and being charged no more than the maximum rate of interest on debts
incurred before military service.
We should do all we can to make sure there is a strong watchdog on
the beat that can enforce the protections we have put in place. When it
comes to the SCRA, that strong watchdog should be the CFPB. Our
legislation is supported by more than thirty groups, including the
National Military Family Association, the Military Officers Association
of America, Veterans Education Success, Student Veterans of America,
Consumer Federation of America, Americans for Financial Reform, Public
Citizen, the Sargent Shriver National Center on Poverty Law, U.S. PIRG,
Consumers Union, National Association of Consumer Advocates, National
Consumer Law Center (on behalf of its low income clients), National
Community Reinvestment Coalition, Center for Popular Democracy,
Alliance for Justice, American Association for Justice, and the Center
for Responsible Lending. I urge our colleagues to help honor our
commitment to our Nation's service members by joining us in this effort
to improve the supervision and enforcement of the SCRA.
______