[Congressional Record Volume 163, Number 101 (Wednesday, June 14, 2017)]
[Senate]
[Pages S3495-S3496]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

  SA 241. Mr. CARDIN (for himself, Mr. Portman, and Mr. Rubio) 
submitted an amendment intended to be proposed by him to the bill S. 
722, to impose sanctions with respect to Iran in relation to Iran's 
ballistic missile program, support for acts of international terrorism, 
and violations of human rights, and for other purposes; which was 
ordered to lie on the table; as follows:

       At the end, add the following:

                   TITLE II--ISRAEL ANTI-BOYCOTT ACT

     SEC. 201. SHORT TITLE.

       This title may be cited as the ``Israel Anti-Boycott Act''.

     SEC. 202. FINDINGS.

       Congress finds the following:
       (1) The United Nations Human Rights Council (in this 
     section referred to as the ``UNHRC'') has long targeted 
     Israel with systematic, politically motivated, assaults on 
     its legitimacy designed to stigmatize and isolate Israel 
     internationally.
       (2) The UNHRC maintains a permanent agenda item known as 
     ``Item 7'' to ensure that Israel will be criticized at every 
     gathering of the UNHRC.
       (3) At its 31st session on March 24, 2016, the UNHRC 
     targeted Israel with a commercial boycott, calling for the 
     establishment of a database, such as a ``blacklist'', of 
     companies that operate, or have business relations with 
     entities that operate, beyond Israel's 1949 Armistice lines, 
     including East Jerusalem.
       (4) At its 32nd session in March 2017, the UNHRC is 
     considering a resolution pursuant to agenda item 7 to 
     withhold assistance from and prevent trade with ``territories 
     occupied since 1967'', including East Jerusalem, the West 
     Bank, and the Golan Heights, stating that businesses that 
     engage in economic activity in those areas could face civil 
     or criminal legal action.
       (5) For a half century, Congress has combated anti-Israel 
     boycotts and other discriminatory activity under the Export 
     Administration Act of 1979 (as continued in effect pursuant 
     to the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 
     1701 et seq.)), under part VI of title X of the Tax Reform 
     Act of 1976 (Public Law 94-455; 90 Stat. 1649) (commonly 
     referred to as the ``Ribicoff Amendment''), in free trade 
     agreements with Bahrain and Oman, and in Saudi Arabia's 
     accession negotiations to the World Trade Organization.
       (6) The recent action of the UNHRC is reminiscent of the 
     Arab League Boycott, which also called for the establishment 
     of a ``blacklist'' and promoted a primary, as well as a 
     secondary and tertiary, boycott against Israel, targeting 
     United States and other companies that trade or invest with 
     or in Israel, designed to harm Israel, any business operating 
     in, or doing business with, Israel, or companies that do 
     business with companies operating in Israel.
       (7) Congress recently passed anti-boycott, divestment, and 
     sanctions measures in the Bipartisan Congressional Trade 
     Priorities and Accountability Act of 2015 (19 U.S.C. 4201 et 
     seq.) and section 909 of the Trade Facilitation and Trade 
     Enforcement Act of 2015 (19 U.S.C. 4452), which establish, 
     among other things--
       (A) the opposition of the United States to actions to 
     boycott, divest from, or sanction Israel;
       (B) requirements that the United States utilize trade 
     negotiations to combat state-led or international 
     governmental organization-led actions to boycott, divest 
     from, or sanction Israel; and
       (C) reporting requirements regarding the actions of foreign 
     countries or international organizations that establish 
     barriers to trade or investment for United States companies 
     in or with Israel.

     SEC. 203. STATEMENT OF POLICY.

       Congress--
       (1) opposes the United Nations Human Rights Council 
     resolution of March 24, 2016, which urges countries to 
     pressure their own companies to divest from, or break 
     contracts with, Israel, and calls for the creation of a 
     ``blacklist'' of companies that either operate, or have 
     business relations with entities that operate, beyond 
     Israel's 1949 Armistice lines, including East Jerusalem;
       (2) views such policies as actions to boycott, divest from, 
     or sanction Israel; and
       (3) in order to counter the effects of actions to boycott, 
     divest from, or sanction Israel, encourages full 
     implementation of the United States-Israel Strategic 
     Partnership Act of 2014 (Public Law 113-296; 128 Stat. 4075) 
     through enhanced, governmentwide, coordinated United States-
     Israel scientific and technological cooperation in civilian 
     areas such as with respect to energy, water, agriculture, 
     alternative fuel technology, civilian space technology, and 
     security.

     SEC. 204. ADDITIONAL PROHIBITIONS RELATING TO FOREIGN 
                   BOYCOTTS UNDER EXPORT ADMINISTRATION ACT OF 
                   1979.

       (a) Declaration of Policy.--Section 3(5) of the Export 
     Administration Act of 1979 (50 U.S.C. 4602(5)) (as continued 
     in effect pursuant to the International Emergency Economic 
     Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.)) is amended--
       (1) by amending subparagraph (A) to read as follows:
       ``(A) to oppose--
       ``(i) restrictive trade practices or boycotts fostered or 
     imposed by foreign countries, or requests to impose 
     restrictive trade practices or boycotts by foreign countries, 
     against other countries friendly to the United States or 
     against any United States person; and
       ``(ii) restrictive trade practices or boycotts fostered or 
     imposed by any international governmental organization 
     against Israel or requests to impose restrictive trade 
     practices or boycotts by any international governmental 
     organization against Israel;''; and
       (2) in subparagraph (B), by striking ``which have the 
     effect'' and all the follows and inserting the following: 
     ``which have the effect of furthering or supporting--
       ``(i) restrictive trade practices or boycotts fostered or 
     imposed by any foreign country, or requests to impose 
     restrictive trade practices or boycotts by any foreign 
     country, against a country friendly to the United States or 
     against any United States person; and
       ``(ii) restrictive trade practices or boycotts fostered or 
     imposed by any international governmental organization 
     against Israel or requests to impose restrictive trade 
     practices or boycotts by any international governmental 
     organization against Israel; and''.
       (b) Foreign Boycotts.--Section 8 of the Export 
     Administration Act of 1979 (50 U.S.C. 4607) (as continued in 
     effect pursuant to the International Emergency Economic 
     Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.)) is amended--
       (1) in subsection (a)(1)--
       (A) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A)--
       (i) by inserting ``, or request to impose any boycott by a 
     foreign country,'' after ``a foreign country'';
       (ii) by inserting ``, or support any boycott fostered or 
     imposed by any international governmental organization 
     against Israel or request to impose any boycott by any 
     international governmental organization against Israel'' 
     after ``pursuant to United States law or regulation'';
       (B) in subparagraph (A), by inserting ``or international 
     governmental organization (as the case may be)'' after ``of 
     the boycotting country''; and
       (C) in subparagraph (D)--
       (i) by inserting ``, or requesting the furnishing of 
     information,'' after ``Furnishing information''; and

[[Page S3496]]

       (ii) by inserting ``or with the international governmental 
     organization (as the case may be)'' after ``in the boycotting 
     country''; and
       (2) in subsection (c)--
       (A) by inserting ``, or requests to impose restrictive 
     trade practices or boycotts by foreign countries,'' after 
     ``foreign countries''; and
       (B) by inserting ``or restrictive trade practices or 
     boycotts fostered or imposed by any international 
     governmental organization against Israel or requests to 
     impose restrictive trade practices or boycotts by any 
     international governmental organization against Israel'' 
     before the period at the end.
       (c) Violations of Section 8(a).--Section 11 of the Export 
     Administration Act of 1979 (50 U.S.C. 4610) (as continued in 
     effect pursuant to the International Emergency Economic 
     Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.)) is amended--
       (1) in subsection (a), by inserting ``or (j)'' after 
     ``subsection (b)''; and
       (2) by adding at the end the following:
       ``(j) Violations of Section 8(a).--Whoever knowingly 
     violates or conspires to or attempts to violate any provision 
     of section 8(a) or any regulation, order, or license issued 
     thereunder shall be fined in accordance with section 206 of 
     the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 
     1705).''.
       (d) Definition of International Governmental 
     Organization.--Section 16 of the Export Administration Act of 
     1979 (50 U.S.C. 4618) (as continued in effect pursuant to the 
     International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701 
     et seq.)) is amended--
       (1) by redesignating paragraphs (7) and (8) as paragraphs 
     (8) and (9), respectively; and
       (2) by inserting after paragraph (6) the following:
       ``(7) the term `international governmental organization' 
     includes the United Nations and the European Union;''.
       (e) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section 
     take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act and 
     apply with respect to actions described in section 8(a) of 
     the Export Administration Act of 1979 (as continued in effect 
     pursuant to the International Emergency Economic Powers Act 
     (50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.)) taken or knowingly agreed to be 
     taken on or after such date of enactment.
       (f) Implementation.--The President shall implement the 
     amendments made by this section by exercising the authorities 
     of the President under the International Emergency Economic 
     Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.).

     SEC. 205. POLICY OF THE UNITED STATES RELATING TO BOYCOTT OF 
                   ISRAEL UNDER EXPORT-IMPORT BANK ACT OF 1945.

       Section 2(b)(1)(B) of the Export-Import Bank Act of 1945 
     (12 U.S.C. 635(b)(1)(B)) is amended in the sixth sentence by 
     inserting after ``child labor),'' the following: ``or 
     opposing policies and actions that are politically motivated 
     and are intended to penalize or otherwise limit commercial 
     relations specifically with citizens or residents of Israel, 
     entities organized under the laws of Israel, or the 
     Government of Israel,''.

     SEC. 206. DEFINITIONS.

       (a) In General.--In this title:
       (1) Actions to boycott, divest from, or sanction israel.--
     The term ``actions to boycott, divest from, or sanction 
     Israel'' has the meaning given that term in section 
     102(b)(20)(B) of the Bipartisan Congressional Trade 
     Priorities and Accountability Act of 2015 (19 U.S.C. 
     4201(b)(20)(B)).
       (2) International governmental organization.--The term 
     ``international governmental organization'' includes the 
     United Nations and the European Union.
       (3) Politically motivated.--The term ``politically 
     motivated'' means actions to impede or constrain commerce 
     with Israel that are intended to coerce political action from 
     or impose policy positions on Israel.
       (b) Rule of Construction.--Nothing in this section shall be 
     construed to alter the established policy of the United 
     States or to establish new United States policy concerning 
     final status issues associated with the Arab-Israeli 
     conflict, including border delineation, that can only be 
     resolved through direct negotiations between the parties.
                                 ______