[Congressional Record Volume 163, Number 88 (Monday, May 22, 2017)]
[Senate]
[Pages S3051-S3052]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
Russia Investigation
Mr. SCHUMER. Mr. President, since last week's all-Senators briefing
with Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, some of my friends on the
other side of the aisle have alleged that his appointment of a special
counsel impedes the congressional investigation into Russian
interference in our elections and whether the Trump campaign was
involved. Nothing could be further from the truth.
The executive branch investigation under the special counsel looks at
criminal wrongdoing. The congressional investigation takes a broader
approach. The two can proceed on parallel tracks, as has happened many
times in the past. If anything the congressional investigation is doing
potentially interferes with the special counsel's activities, the two
parties will discuss it. It is a process called deconfliction. They
know how to do it. They have done it before. There is no reason
whatsoever for the congressional investigation to slow down or stop.
Mr. Mueller's appointment as special counsel in no way diminishes the
need for Congress to play an active role in helping to get to the
bottom of all the recent events. Let me repeat. This is our solemn
constitutional duty, the very bedrock of the separation of powers and
coequal branches of government designed by our Founding Fathers to
preserve something we all cherish: American liberty and American
democracy. Let me outline three things that should happen.
First, Intelligence Committee Chair Burr and Ranking Member Warner
should continue to pursue their committee's investigation into these
matters with just as much vigor. That investigation has been proceeding
in a bipartisan way, and it absolutely should continue as such. For
example, my friends Senators Burr and Warner have recently requested
financial records of key Trump campaign officials from the Treasury
Department. They should be given that information and continue to
pursue whatever other avenues they view as helpful to the committee's
investigation.
Second, Mr. Comey should testify in both the Judiciary and the
Intelligence Committees to discuss the events surrounding his
dismissal. The committees should be given access to memos he reportedly
drafted following interactions with President Trump, and Congress
should also be provided any transcripts or tapes the White House might
have of Mr. Comey's conversations with President Trump.
Third, the Intelligence Committee must be provided the details of
transcripts relating to President Trump's reported disclosure of
information to the Russian Foreign Minister and Ambassador. There is a
great deal of dispute about what was said at that meeting. The
committee should have access to both Mr. Comey's notes and the White
House's notes.
Finally, the Senate must demand the next FBI Director be nonpartisan,
independent, fearless, and of unimpeachable integrity, just as Mr.
Mueller is. A career politician of either party or anyone who suggests
a lack of impartiality should not be considered a fit choice for that
office. Every one of these, by the way, deals with congressional
oversight--some directly, like the appointment of an FBI Director; some
a little
[[Page S3052]]
more indirectly, such as figuring out what exactly was said in the room
with the Russian Foreign Minister and Ambassador, but all of it is
clearly within what the Constitution requires and the Founding Fathers
wanted Congress to be. So the congressional committees have really an
obligation to our democracy to continue their role.