[Congressional Record Volume 163, Number 86 (Thursday, May 18, 2017)]
[Senate]
[Pages S3031-S3033]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
Healthcare Legislation
Mr. President, on another matter, the Senate continues to work toward
repealing and replacing ObamaCare, unfortunately, without any help
whatsoever from our Democratic colleagues, even though they know
ObamaCare is failing the millions of people who buy their insurance in
the individual market. Premiums are skyrocketing because of adverse
selection and deductibles are so high they are effectively denied the
benefit of having insurance in the first place. One would think an
elected Senator representing those constituents would care enough about
it to try to do something about it, but our Democratic colleagues,
because they are so tied to ObamaCare and they feel like they have to
defend it at all costs, I think it has blinded them to the failings of
ObamaCare, certainly in the individual market. There ought to be some
basis for us to work together in the best interests of all our
constituents and the entire country.
[[Page S3032]]
Some of our colleagues have said: Well, we would be revisiting
ObamaCare even if Hillary Clinton had been elected, and that is
absolutely true because ObamaCare is failing millions of Americans, and
it is our responsibility, on a bipartisan basis, to do something about
it. So far, the politics of the day seem to be carrying our Democratic
colleagues along with it. I hope at some time the fever breaks and they
will see fit to do their duty, as we are attempting to do our duty,
which is to replace ObamaCare with affordable healthcare that preserves
individual choices and doesn't continue to exacerbate and aggravate the
national debt and our financial status in the country.
ObamaCare, we now know, was oversold. At the time, the President
said: If you like your policy, you can keep your policy; if you like
your doctor, you can keep your doctor; and, oh, by the way, a family of
four will see a reduction in their premiums of $2,500 a year. None of
those claims proved to be true.
Again, the Presiding Officer was a former attorney general, as I was
in my State, and we had a Consumer Protection Division. When people
misrepresented the services or product they sold, we sued them. We went
after them for consumer fraud. ObamaCare, to me, is one of the largest
cases of consumer fraud I have ever seen, and people deserve better.
It is time to do away with this government-mandated, top-down
approach that doesn't work. It is time to provide the American people
with more affordable options. That is what we are trying to do. One
would think that would be something all of us would want to do.
ObamaCare has taken a heavy toll on folks in my State. It is
estimated that more than one-third of our counties are down to just one
health insurance provider this year, and the ones that are there are
saying that unless something changes, they are going to see double-
digit increases in premiums for 2018. They are down to one provider
because everybody else has decided they have lost enough money and they
want to get out while they can. To have one provider is not about more
options and choices and better coverage, it is an unworkable path
forward for our Nation's healthcare needs.
Fortunately, every member of the Republican conference is now working
together to do away with this unworkable healthcare plan and replace it
with healthcare that helps American families get the coverage they need
at a price they can afford. Why wouldn't we all be interested in
providing the healthcare they need at a price they can afford?
The House has taken the first critical step, and I know my colleagues
and I are eager to do our part. Since the Democrats refuse to lift a
finger, we are going to have to do this with 52 Republicans, and it is
not easy, but just because it is hard is no excuse for not succeeding.
We must succeed in the best interests of our constituents.
This isn't just a matter of taking something that is OK and making it
better; this is taking something that is failing and, if we fail to
act, will continue to drag Americans by the millions down with it.
It is important to understand the trials that Americans have faced
under ObamaCare so we can move forward in a direction that supports
families across the country. One of my constituents wrote me recently
and told me that his premiums were going up by about 50 percent. To
make matters worse, his doctors wouldn't accept patients on ObamaCare
plans. That is a theme we have seen across the country: healthcare
options dwindling while prices keep getting higher. The cost of his
healthcare keeps going up, and his salary isn't going up at the same
rate. He is losing disposable income, even though he has a job. So he
is literally poorer as a result of ObamaCare. This isn't helping him,
this is hurting him, and all because his monthly payment for health
insurance is climbing. So he is living from paycheck to paycheck, and
of course he is worried about the future, which is the reason he
contacted me.
Unfortunately, this gentleman is representative of the unintended
consequences brought about by ObamaCare. All of our offices get a lot
of calls, a lot of emails and letters just like his. He is not on the
exchanges because he wants to keep his doctors, and he is employed with
employer-provided health insurance. To many in America, this would be a
huge blessing, but unfortunately ObamaCare did nothing to help people
like him. His premiums are going up so high, he is concerned about
being able to put food on the table for his family. What a tragedy.
What a disaster. This is truly a manmade disaster, and it is a crystal
clear example of just how flawed ObamaCare really is.
This constituent of mine ended his letter to me by calling on
Congress to fully repeal ObamaCare, and that is exactly what we will
do. He is not alone in calling for change. Many Texans have been
writing and calling in, and have been for some time, to tell me their
ObamaCare story. It is making their lives harder, as I mentioned, with
skyrocketing premiums, higher deductibles, and fewer choices of doctors
and healthcare providers. These are the folks I was sent here to
represent and whom I am fighting for, and each of us, I know, is doing
their part--at least on this side of the aisle--to fight for our
constituents who are being hurt by the status quo.
The status quo is not acceptable. I know it is not acceptable to our
colleagues across the aisle, but they are so frozen in place by their
own politics that they can't even step across the aisle and work with
us in areas where we might agree. I hope this happens at some point,
but it is not happening right now.
So we are going to repeal and replace ObamaCare and come up with the
very best healthcare plan that we can--again, one that preserves
choices, brings premiums down, and makes it more affordable.
Here is the final reason why we need to do this: We promised. We
promised. In the last elections, we promised. There is a reason why,
when ObamaCare passed, there were 60 Democrats and today there are 48.
It is because in every intervening election we have made the perils of
ObamaCare an issue, and in every election our friends across the aisle
have lost Senators because they simply can't defend the status quo.
But beyond elections, I believe there is a time to engage in
electioneering and there is a time to govern, and now is the time for
us to govern responsibly. But it does have political benefits, too,
because if people think you are doing a good job and if people think
you care about them, then, they are likely to reward you politically.
But that is not the main reason we should do it. We should do it
because it is the right thing to do and because people are hurting and
people are anxious and concerned about their future, living paycheck to
paycheck, with ObamaCare taking a bigger and bigger bite out of their
ability to provide for their family.
So we are going to get this done. Just because it is not easy isn't
an excuse for not doing it. We can't complain that it is too hard
because that is what we asked our constituents to send us here to do--
to do the hard stuff, not the easy stuff--to do the hard stuff. This is
hard, but it is not impossible. It is imminently doable. But it takes
political will and commitment not just to keep our promise but, then,
to do the dead-level best of our abilities to come up with a plan that
actually believes not in more government control but in more individual
control over your healthcare choices and to bring competition back into
the marketplace, to let the market set rates and quality rather than
the government determining this from Washington, DC.
One thing I truly believe is that competition makes things better for
consumers. It brings down prices and it improves service because in a
competitive environment where people have choices, they are going to go
to the choice which serves their interests the best. They are going to
reward the people who are doing the best job of delivering what they
need and what they want at the price they can afford. It has a way of
regulating the insurance market better than anything Washington, DC,
could do--particularly by command and control of programs like
ObamaCare.
So we are going to get it done, and we are all working together. We
would continue to invite our colleagues across the aisle not to sit on
their hands, not to do nothing but to do what they can, working with us
in a
[[Page S3033]]
nonpartisan or bipartisan way to help save the people who are currently
being damaged and hurt by the failures of ObamaCare but then to help us
build something better, something more durable than what we have seen
with ObamaCare.
I yield the floor.
I suggest the absence of a quorum.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will call the roll.
The legislative clerk proceeded to call the roll.
Mrs. ERNST. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the order for
the quorum call be rescinded.
The PRESIDING OFFICER (Mrs. Fischer). Without objection, it is so
ordered.
The question is, Will the Senate advise and consent to the Brand
nomination?
Mr. SASSE. Mr. President, I ask for the yeas and nays.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Is there a sufficient second?
There appears to be a sufficient second.
The clerk will call the roll.
The senior assistant legislative clerk called the roll.
Mr. DURBIN. I announce that the Senator from Hawaii (Ms. Hirono) and
the Senator from Virginia (Mr. Kaine) are necessarily absent.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Are there any other Senators in the Chamber
desiring to vote?
The result was announced--yeas 52, nays 46, as follows:
[Rollcall Vote No. 131 Ex.]
YEAS--52
Alexander
Barrasso
Blunt
Boozman
Burr
Capito
Cassidy
Cochran
Collins
Corker
Cornyn
Cotton
Crapo
Cruz
Daines
Enzi
Ernst
Fischer
Flake
Gardner
Graham
Grassley
Hatch
Heller
Hoeven
Inhofe
Isakson
Johnson
Kennedy
Lankford
Lee
McCain
McConnell
Moran
Murkowski
Paul
Perdue
Portman
Risch
Roberts
Rounds
Rubio
Sasse
Scott
Shelby
Strange
Sullivan
Thune
Tillis
Toomey
Wicker
Young
NAYS--46
Baldwin
Bennet
Blumenthal
Booker
Brown
Cantwell
Cardin
Carper
Casey
Coons
Cortez Masto
Donnelly
Duckworth
Durbin
Feinstein
Franken
Gillibrand
Harris
Hassan
Heinrich
Heitkamp
King
Klobuchar
Leahy
Manchin
Markey
McCaskill
Menendez
Merkley
Murphy
Murray
Nelson
Peters
Reed
Sanders
Schatz
Schumer
Shaheen
Stabenow
Tester
Udall
Van Hollen
Warner
Warren
Whitehouse
Wyden
NOT VOTING--2
Hirono
Kaine
The nomination was confirmed.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Under the previous order, the motion to
reconsider is considered made and laid upon the table and the President
will be immediately notified of the Senate's action.
____________________