[Congressional Record Volume 163, Number 81 (Wednesday, May 10, 2017)]
[Senate]
[Page S2872]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
Congressional Review Act Resolution
Mr. HEINRICH. Mr. President, I am proud that the Senate voted to
reject an effort to overturn commonsense protections to reduce methane
waste. It was 3 years ago that satellite images from NASA revealed that
there is a giant cloud of methane--about the size of the State of
Delaware--sitting over the Four Corners region in Northwestern New
Mexico and Southwestern Colorado.
Although evidence had shown that there was methane air pollution in
the Four Corners as early as 2003, the image of NASA data is truly
striking. This is a warning of a potentially major threat to public
health for communities in the region.
The San Juan Basin in the Four Corners region has long been a leading
producer of oil and natural gas. With the natural gas boom of the mid-
2000s, production in the basin grew by leaps and bounds, and that
created hundreds of new high-paying jobs and a major new domestic
source of an important energy resource.
Unfortunately, amid all this growth, some producers developing
natural gas on our public lands and on Tribal lands released harmful
air pollution and wasted these publicly owned resources by allowing
methane to leak into the air from faulty equipment and pipes, and even
by burning off valuable natural gas in the process called flaring.
Following the discovery of the methane hotspot, researchers at NASA's
Jet Propulsion Laboratory joined Caltech and University of Michigan
scientists to conduct a detailed study into the cause of the methane
cloud. Some producers claimed that the hotspot was caused primarily by
natural seeps of gas from underground geologic formations and by gas
venting out from an old coal mine in the region.
The NASA researchers, using instrumentation mounted on aircraft that
flew close to the ground and throughout 1,200 square miles of airspace
in the Four Corners region, identified leaks from natural gas wells as
the major methane emitters contributing to the methane air pollution.
As greenhouse gas, methane has over 80 times the global warming
potential as carbon dioxide over the short term. We have a moral
obligation to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and to mitigate our
contributions to climate change.
Even absent its consequences for climate change, methane leaks waste
valuable energy resources, and they harm public health. When methane
leaks from oil and gas wells, harmful carcinogens such as benzene leak
into the air alongside it.
Because of the air pollution over the Four Corners region, the
American Lung Association gave San Juan County in New Mexico an F
rating for ozone pollution in 2016. That means children suffer more
asthma attacks and seniors have more difficulty breathing.
I want it to be clear that this is not a case of pitting development
of our energy resources against human health. We have a golden
opportunity to apply innovative, existing technologies to this problem,
grow our economy, and improve air quality for the people of the Four
Corners region. That is because minimizing the amount of methane that
leaks, vents, or flares out of the oil and gas wells isn't just good
for air quality, it is good for business and the bottom line.
When oil and gas companies modernize their equipment to reduce leaks,
they are able to capture more gas that they can sell, as well as
increase worker safety at their wells. When we capture more gas, that
also means we see more royalties and revenues for States, Tribes, and
local communities. By updating oil and natural gas production equipment
and infrastructure to reduce wasted natural gas, we create new jobs for
energy workers and manufacturers.
When we reduce wasteful leaks, it means that instead of having a
giant methane cloud over the northwest corner of New Mexico and over
the Navajo Nation--a major public health hazard--we put our publicly
owned natural gas resources to beneficial use. That is the definition
of a win-win situation.
I say all this because that is exactly what the Bureau of Land
Management's methane waste prevention rule is designed to do. These
commonsense and cost-effective protections in the rule were put in
place to reduce harmful methane and benzene pollution and to ensure
that oil and gas operations are using technological advances that
minimize emissions and maximize the amount of natural gas we produce.
Between 2009 and 2015, the BLM estimates that oil and gas producers
on our public and Tribal lands vented, flared, and leaked 462 billion
cubic feet of methane. They wasted enough natural gas to supply over 6
million American households for a year. Instead of heating our homes or
fueling powerplants, powering buses, that gas was leaked into the
atmosphere, wasting millions of dollars of this limited resource.
It is estimated that the oil and gas industry wastes about $100
million worth of natural gas every year. That also means $6 million
each year of lost State revenue, revenue that pays for schools, roads,
and emergency services in New Mexico. That is quite a figure.
A recent report found that New Mexico taxpayers have lost out on over
$42 million of royalty revenues since the year 2009--$42,728,949 to be
exact. The BLM's methane waste prevention rule will help put a stop to
this wasted resource.
While developing the rule, the BLM held public meetings, it held
Tribal consultations, and it factored in feedback from over 300,000
comments submitted during the public comment period. The agency also
coordinated with States like Colorado, Wyoming, and North Dakota that
have already created similar protections to reduce methane leaking and
flaring at the State level.
The BLM rule will have minimal costs for oil and gas producers, and,
in fact, leak detections and repairs required by the rule will help
companies make more money selling the gas that they save. Meanwhile,
this rule will grow our economy by investing in innovative companies
that have developed the technologies to minimize leaks and protect our
public health. This rule should not have been controversial.
The overwhelming majority of my constituents in New Mexico support
reducing wasted natural gas. A recent poll by Colorado College
conducted after the election found that 74 percent of New Mexicans
support the BLM's methane waste reduction rule.
I am proud that enough Senators shared that view and voted to reject
an attempt to repeal this commonsense protection of public health, air
quality, and responsible development of our natural resources. There is
nothing conservative about making it easier to waste a precious public
energy source.
We should be focused on reducing waste, capturing critical royalties
for New Mexico communities, and putting our natural gas resources to
beneficial use. This repeal effort of the methane rule would have
represented a major step backward.
Today's vote was a major victory for responsible development of our
natural gas resources and our Nation's decades-long commitment to
protect the air we breathe. On behalf of my constituents and theirs, I
want to say a special thank-you to all 51 Senators who supported our
efforts today. Thank you very much.
Mr. President, I yield back the remainder of my time.
I suggest the absence of a quorum.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will call the roll.
The bill clerk proceeded to call the roll.
Mr. PETERS. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the order for
the quorum call be rescinded.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.