[Congressional Record Volume 163, Number 58 (Tuesday, April 4, 2017)]
[House]
[Page H2686]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
NO TAX SUBSIDIES FOR STADIUMS
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under the Speaker's announced policy of
January 3, 2017, the gentleman from Oklahoma (Mr. Russell) is
recognized for 60 minutes as the designee of the majority leader.
Mr. RUSSELL. Mr. Speaker, it is official: the Oakland Raiders are
moving to Las Vegas. Beginning in 2020, they will play in a shiny, new
65,000-seat stadium outfitted with a retractable roof that is expected
to cost $1.9 billion.
If you are an American taxpayer, you will help pay for it, even if
you live nowhere near Nevada. About $750 million for the project will
be financed through municipal bonds, which are tax exempt. The Federal
tax break is projected to amount to some $120 million, according to a
study by the Brookings Institution.
Congress and President Trump should take the Raiders' bad example as
an impetus for reform. As the President considers a $1 trillion plan to
restore America's aging roads, rail, bridges, waterways, and airports,
lawmakers should ask why so many stadiums are following the Las Vegas
model, fleeing one bad economic State and using your tax dollars to go
to another.
The alternative is what we did in Oklahoma City in 1993. Our
residents passed a temporary 1 percent increase in sales tax to fund,
without incurring a debt, a building spree called the Metropolitan Area
Projects, or MAPS. Over 5 years, the plan raised $350 million for nine
projects, including a stadium now called the Chesapeake Energy Arena,
home to NBA basketball's Oklahoma City Thunder. This pay-as-you-go
approach may sound unremarkable, but it is nothing short of
exceptional.
Most professional sports stadiums these days are financed with
municipal bonds, something that they were never intended to be used
for. But this kind of debt wasn't intended for lavish football stadiums
or basketball arenas. Municipal bonds were supposed to give communities
a way to build public projects--hospitals, schools, roads--without
having to pay Federal taxes on the debt's interest. The point was to
ease the financial burden on cities and States that invest in expensive
but essential infrastructure.
Over the past 30 years, however, stadium financiers have exploited a
loophole in the Tax Code to qualify professional sports arenas for
municipal bonds. Because Federal taxes aren't incurred on the interest
of this debt, stadiums essentially receive a multimillion-dollar
subsidy from Washington.
Last year, a Brookings study examined 45 stadiums built or seriously
renovated since 2000; 36 were funded at least in part with municipal
bonds, resulting in forgone Federal tax revenue of $3.7 billion. That
is enough money to employ 88,000 military staff sergeants or give each
State a $74 million block grant, or it could help reduce the national
debt.
To solve this problem, I have introduced, along with my Democratic
colleague, Earl Blumenauer from Oregon, H.R. 811. This bipartisan No
Tax Subsidies for Stadiums Act would prohibit arena financiers from
using municipal bonds. Instead of building enormous, lavish sports
facilities on the backs of unsuspecting taxpayers across the Nation,
financiers should ask communities to buy into their vision. If
residents want a stadium to be built, fine. They should be willing to
pay for it like we did in Oklahoma City; or sports franchises and
leagues always have the option to finance construction like most
businesses do, privately.
Funding an upgrade to America's core infrastructure will be a
challenge. It shouldn't require Congress to use budget gimmicks or run
up the national debt.
Closing loopholes, such as requiring stadium financiers to pay
Federal taxes on bond interest that was intended to improve our
decaying infrastructure, would ensure taxpayers get the best return on
their dollars to improve public infrastructure that all Americans use.
Mr. Speaker, I yield back the balance of my time.
____________________