[Congressional Record Volume 163, Number 54 (Tuesday, March 28, 2017)]
[Senate]
[Page S2029]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
Broadband Consumer Privacy
Mr. FRANKEN. Mr. President, I rise today to talk about the effort by
my Republican colleagues to gut critical consumer privacy protections.
Last week, the Senate voted 50 to 48 to allow internet service
providers such as Comcast, Verizon, and AT&T to freely collect, share,
and sell its customers' private information. Later today, the House
will vote on the same measure.
Let's be clear what we are talking about here. From web browsing
histories to app usage information, broadband providers have easy
access to a whole lot of Americans' personal information. Comcast knows
exactly what ails you when you visit WebMD's Symptom Checker or that
you have recently experienced a major life event when you are browsing
maternity clothes on target.com. They would like the ability to use or
sell this information to target advertising toward you, and they would
really like to use or sell this information without first having to ask
your permission.
Now, for me, the interests of consumers in Minnesota, Texas, and
across our country have always come before those of big corporations.
That is why I have long championed an internet that is open,
accessible, and protects Americans' fundamental rights to privacy. For
most Americans, I don't think those are controversial ideas.
For example, I suggest that most if not all of us in the Senate
believe in the importance of ensuring that Americans have access to
affordable high-speed internet. It is one of those great issues on
which Members on both sides of the aisle can agree. See, we all know
that Americans' cable and broadband bills are too high. The Consumer
Federation of America recently reported that the average American
household spends about $2,700 a year for phone, TV, and Internet
services. That is why it is so disappointing that instead of acting to
make broadband more affordable and more accessible for Americans, my
Republican colleagues have actually paved the way for multibillion-
dollar companies to make even more money off of their consumers by
monetizing some of the most intimate details of their lives. Make no
mistake about it, this is purely and simply a corporate handout at the
expense of Americans' privacy.
When the FCC voted to pass the broadband privacy rules, the broadband
industry was quick to oppose and oppose loudly. In recent months,
internet service providers have used their vast resources to lobby the
FCC and my fellow lawmakers. If House Republicans heed their call, as
my colleagues in the Senate have done, companies like Comcast, Verizon,
and AT&T will be free to sell their customers' personal information to
the highest bidder, and importantly, they will do so without the
oversight or regulation of either the Federal Communications Commission
or the Federal Trade Commission.
For my part, I have long held that Americans have a fundamental right
to privacy. We deserve both transparency and accountability from
companies that have the capacity to trade on their private information.
Should some people choose to leave their personal information in the
hands of those companies, they certainly deserve to know that their
information is being safeguarded to the greatest degree possible. I am
going to keep fighting on behalf of consumers in Minnesota and across
the country to secure these rights because I work for them and not the
broadband industry.
Thank you, Mr. President.
I suggest the absence of a quorum.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will call the roll.
The senior assistant legislative clerk proceeded to call the roll.
Mr. CORKER. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the order for
the quorum call be rescinded.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.