[Congressional Record Volume 163, Number 38 (Monday, March 6, 2017)]
[Senate]
[Pages S1601-S1603]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
DISAPPROVING A RULE SUBMITTED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Mr. McCONNELL. Mr. President, I move to proceed to H.J. Res. 44.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The question is on agreeing to the motion to
proceed.
The motion was agreed to.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will report the joint resolution.
The legislative clerk read as follows:
A joint resolution (H.J. Res. 44) disapproving the rule
submitted by the Department of the Interior relating to
Bureau of Land Management regulations that establish the
procedures used to prepare, revise, or amend land use plans
pursuant to the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of
1976.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from Illinois.
Travel Ban
Mr. DURBIN. Mr. President, earlier today, President Trump signed a
new Executive order that bans travel to the United States from a new
list of Muslim-majority countries and bans all refugees. This new
Executive order includes some cosmetic changes, but these changes do
not alter the fact that President Trump's travel ban is still
unconstitutional and still inconsistent with the values of this Nation.
This Executive order plays directly into ISIS's argument that the
United States is waging a war against a religion. The President's first
travel ban was blocked by multiple Federal courts, and his latest, I
hope, will face the same fate.
Let's consider how we have arrived at this point. During his first
full week in office, President Trump signed his first Executive order
that banned Muslims and refugees. This order resulted in chaos in
airports across the country. Dozens of legal immigrants were detained,
not because they did anything wrong or because they were any danger to
our Nation. It was solely because of where they came from. There was an
Iraqi immigrant who put himself and his family in harm's way by working
with American troops as an interpreter, two disabled seniors--a husband
and wife--and a 5-year-old child. These were people who were the
victims of President Trump's first Executive order.
The order faced widespread resistance from the American people, the
courts, and even from the administration itself. Acting Attorney
General Sally Yates said the Justice Department could not in good
conscience defend the President's Executive order. So the President
fired her.
Now comes this new Executive order. We know that, over time, Ms.
Yates was right. She stood for principle, and when multiple Federal
courts blocked that Executive order, we understood that she appreciated
the law, unlike those who crafted this terrible order.
Rather than repeal the Executive order or defend it in court, the
Trump administration is trying to evade these
[[Page S1602]]
legal challenges by issuing a new version but with some tweaks. The
original Executive order banned travelers to the United States from
seven Muslim-majority countries. The President heard the plea about
this ban on Muslim travelers. He issued a new order today which does
not ban travelers from seven Muslim-majority countries but from only
six. This is still, nevertheless, an attack on religious freedom that
risks alienating hundreds of millions of Muslims across the world.
Our focus should be on people with suspected links to terrorism. The
President will have no resistance from this Congress--from either side
of the aisle--if he goes after actual suspects of terrorism, but this
should be done regardless of the suspect's religion.
This order--the new one--still blocks refugees from coming to the
United States for at least 120 days, and it cuts by more than 50
percent the number of refugees who will be settled in the United States
this year. Turning away innocent people who are fleeing persecution,
genocide, and terror is not the American way. It will not keep us
safer. Sadly, it projects an image of America to the world that is
totally inconsistent with where we have been as a Nation.
No matter what spin the White House puts on it, the President's new
Executive order is still fatally flawed. Multiple statements from the
President himself and from several of his advisers have made clear that
his intention is to bar Muslims from entering the United States and to
give priority to Christian refugees. This violates the Constitution's
establishment clause and the equal protection clause. Tweaking the
language of the ban cannot remedy the President's original unlawful
intent.
During the Presidential campaign, the President issued the following
statement:
Donald J. Trump is calling for a total and complete
shutdown of Muslims entering the United States until our
country's representatives can figure out what is going on.
When the President signed his original Executive order, his advisers
made clear that it was intending to carry out this campaign promise.
Listen to what former mayor of New York City--and one of the closest
advisers to Donald Trump--Rudy Giuliani said:
I'll tell you the whole history of it: When President Trump
first announced it, he said ``Muslim ban.'' He called me up.
He said, ``Put a commission together. Show me the right way
to do it legally.''
Rudy Giuliani.
Now White House Adviser Stephen Miller has made it clear that his
intention is to ban Muslims, and he says:
These are mostly minor, technical differences.
Fundamentally, you are still going to have the same, basic
policy outcome for the country.
Stephen Miller.
We are in the midst of the largest refugee crisis in the history of
the world. More than 65 million people have been forcibly displaced
from their homes. The brutal Syrian conflict--the epicenter of this
crisis--has killed hundreds of thousands, injured more than a million,
and displaced more than half of Syria's population. In some areas,
children in this country--in the 21st century--are starving to death.
The conflict has forced more than 4.7 million refugees to flee Syria.
Around 70 percent of all Syrian refugees are women and children. Half
of the Syrian refugee children are not in school. Millions in and
outside of Syria are in urgent need of humanitarian assistance.
We cannot forget the lessons of history. In 1939, the United States
refused to let the SS St. Louis dock in our country, sending over 900
Jewish refugees back to Europe, where many died in concentration camps.
After that tragic moral failure in the United States--after we turned
our back on Jewish refugees who were fleeing Hitler--the United States
examined its conscience and came up with a new program. It came up with
a new approach, and it was bipartisan. Since World War II, the American
people have worked to set an example for the world by accepting
refugees.
Listen to those who have been accepted and made a part of America--
almost 400,000 Eastern Europeans after World War II, close to 400,000
Vietnamese refugees fleeing the Vietnam war, approximately 650,000
Cuban refugees after Castro came to power.
Let me note, parenthetically, that, of the four Hispanic U.S.
Senators today, three can trace their roots to this Cuban migration to
the United States, and their families were refugees. They sit on the
floor of the Senate and represent some of our great States. Yet, with
this President, he is asking them and all of us to ignore this history.
We have accepted more than 150,000 refugees from the former
Yugoslavia. Over 100,000 Soviet Jews, who were escaping the persecution
of their religion and looking for freedom, came to the United States.
Many of these refugees were fleeing regimes that were hostile to our
country. Some argued that spies and other hostile elements could be
hidden among them.
Think about the hundreds of thousands who came from Communist-
controlled Cuba into the United States. Were they subjected to extreme
vetting? No. They were people who said: We have come here and are
looking for freedom. We opened our doors, and they have made us a
better country because of it. The United States was not frightened by
the fearmongers when it came to these refugees joining us in the United
States, and we shouldn't be today.
Let's be clear. Refugees who come into our country this day are the
most carefully vetted and investigated of all of the travelers to the
United States. Before refugees are admitted to the United States, they
have to pass careful, rigorous security screenings. All of that
screening takes place before they even set foot in America, and Syrian
refugees undergo a new layer of enhanced review before they are allowed
to come to America.
President Trump's own Department of Homeland Security has determined
that his travel ban will not make us safer. Listen to this memo from
the Department of Homeland Security's Office of Intelligence and
Analysis in President Trump's administration:
Country of citizenship is unlikely to be a reliable
indicator of potential terrorist activity. Since the
beginning of the Syrian conflict in March 2011, the foreign-
born, primarily U.S.-based individuals who were inspired by a
foreign terrorist organization to participate in terrorism-
related activity were citizens of 26 different countries.
The Trump administration believes they have found--first seven--now
six countries from where they will deny terrorists access to the United
States, even those who have gone through the vetting to be considered
refugees.
Listen to this. It is another memo from the same Department--the
Department of Homeland Security's Office of Intelligence and Analysis--
under President Trump:
Most foreign-born, U.S.-based violent extremists likely
radicalized several years after their entry to the United
States, limiting the ability of screening and vetting
officials to prevent their entry because of national security
concerns.
The point is that it is not likely a terrorist is going to stand in
line for 2 years to become a refugee to the United States and go
through all of the background checks and live in a refugee camp for
that purpose. Those who ended up being involved in terrorist activities
were converted after their having arrived in the United States, and
they included in their ranks many who were born in the United States.
If we are serious--really serious--about protecting America, we
should close the loopholes that make it too easy for foreign visitors
and suspected terrorists to buy deadly weapons. Most people do not
know, but we have not precluded--or stopped--those who are visiting the
United States from buying weapons. Even if we have not checked them,
there are no background checks when it comes to terrorism. We should
focus on individuals who are engaged in suspicious behavior, not target
entire Muslim countries or the entire refugee population.
It makes no sense. Even President Trump's Department of Homeland
Security says as much, but this President is determined to go forward
with his Muslim ban. He is determined to build walls at our borders. He
is determined to instill fear in our hearts.
That is not how America works, and it is not how we will move
forward. Let's not continue the cruelty and deception of blaming
immigrants and refugees for our security and economic challenges. We
should work together, in the spirit of post-World War II America, and
set an example for the world in order to build a better America for all
Americans, including new
[[Page S1603]]
Americans--no matter the color of their skin, where their parents were
born, or how they pray.
I yield the floor.
I suggest the absence of a quorum.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will call the roll.
The senior assistant legislative clerk proceeded to call the roll.
Mr. DAINES. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the order for
the quorum call be rescinded.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
____________________