[Congressional Record Volume 163, Number 20 (Monday, February 6, 2017)]
[Senate]
[Page S855]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
Appealing the Ruling of the Chair
The question before the Senate is, Shall the decision of the Chair to
hold the Senator from Massachusetts in violation of rule XIX stand as
the judgment of the Senate.
Mr. DURBIN. I ask for the yeas and nays.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Is there a sufficient second?
There is a sufficient second.
The clerk will call the roll.
The legislative clerk called the roll.
Mr. CORNYN. The following Senators are necessarily absent: the
Senator from Texas (Mr. Cruz), the Senator from Georgia (Mr. Isakson),
and the Senator from Alabama (Mr. Sessions).
Mr. DURBIN. I announce that the Senator from Delaware (Mr. Carper),
the Senator from Delaware (Mr. Coons), the Senator from California
(Mrs. Feinstein), the Senator from Vermont (Mr. Sanders), and the
Senator from Virginia (Mr. Warner) are necessarily absent.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Are there any other Senators in the Chamber
desiring to vote?
The result was announced--yeas 49, nays 43, as follows:
[Rollcall Vote No. 57 Ex.]
YEAS--49
Alexander
Barrasso
Blunt
Boozman
Burr
Capito
Cassidy
Cochran
Collins
Corker
Cornyn
Cotton
Crapo
Daines
Enzi
Ernst
Fischer
Flake
Gardner
Graham
Grassley
Hatch
Heller
Hoeven
Inhofe
Johnson
Kennedy
Lankford
Lee
McCain
McConnell
Moran
Murkowski
Paul
Perdue
Portman
Risch
Roberts
Rounds
Rubio
Sasse
Scott
Shelby
Sullivan
Thune
Tillis
Toomey
Wicker
Young
NAYS--43
Baldwin
Bennet
Blumenthal
Booker
Brown
Cantwell
Cardin
Casey
Cortez Masto
Donnelly
Duckworth
Durbin
Franken
Gillibrand
Harris
Hassan
Heinrich
Heitkamp
Hirono
Kaine
King
Klobuchar
Leahy
Manchin
Markey
McCaskill
Menendez
Merkley
Murphy
Murray
Nelson
Peters
Reed
Schatz
Schumer
Shaheen
Stabenow
Tester
Udall
Van Hollen
Warren
Whitehouse
Wyden
NOT VOTING--8
Carper
Coons
Cruz
Feinstein
Isakson
Sanders
Sessions
Warner
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The decision of the Chair stands as the
judgment of the Senate.
The Democratic leader.
Mr. SCHUMER. Mr. President, I yield 1 minute to the Senator from
Maine.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from Maine.
Mr. KING. Mr. President, Parliamentary inquiry.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator will state his inquiry.
Mr. KING. In the opinion of the Chair, would one Senator calling
another Senator a liar during debate on the floor of the Senate be a
violation of rule XIX?
The PRESIDING OFFICER. In the opinion of the Chair, it would.
Mr. KING. Thank you, Mr. President.
I yield back.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senate majority leader.
Mr. McCONNELL. Here is what transpired. Senator Warren was giving a
lengthy speech. She had appeared to violate the rule. She was warned.
She was given an explanation. Nevertheless, she persisted.
I yield the floor.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from California.
Ms. HARRIS. Mr. President, the suggestion that reciting the words of
the great Coretta Scott King would invoke rule XIX and force Senator
Warren to sit down and be silent is outrageous.