[Congressional Record Volume 163, Number 12 (Monday, January 23, 2017)]
[Senate]
[Page S369]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
TRANS-PACIFIC PARTNERSHIP
Mr. SCHUMER. Fourth, on the Executive action that the President will
be withdrawing the United States from the TPP, or the Trans-Pacific
Partnership, as you know, my views on trade are probably closer to
President Trump's than they were to President Obama and President Bush.
I opposed NAFTA and TPP. But the fact that the President announced with
fanfare that he will be withdrawing the United States from the Trans-
Pacific Partnership is not news. The Trans-Pacific Partnership was dead
long ago, before President Trump took office. That is why Leader
McConnell didn't bring it up on the floor in the lameduck session. It
didn't have the votes and was even further away from getting votes in
the Senate. It was over.
We await real action on trade, one of the President's signature
campaign issues. Now, what President Trump said in his campaign over
and over was that, on his first day as President, he would label China
a currency manipulator. That hasn't happened. Even though China is
letting their currency float at the moment, you can be sure they will
return to manipulating their currency--hurting our exports, helping
them unfairly compete with American jobs and businesses--as soon as it
is in their best interest to do so.
I worked, frankly, with the nominee for Attorney General, Jeff
Sessions, and with many others to try and get both President Bush and
President Obama to label China a currency manipulator. It didn't
happen, unfortunately. But President Trump promised that he was going
to do it on his first day in office, and it has not happened. If
President Trump wants to send a shot across the bow that he is getting
serious on trade, addressing the currency issue would have been a lot
more effective than a meaningless and redundant Executive order on the
TPP.
While we are on the subject of trade, I remind the President of the
two simple rules he laid out in his inaugural address: buy American and
hire American--two rules that his current businesses don't follow.
Trump shirts and ties are made in China; Trump furniture is made in
Turkey. While he is importuning others to ``make it in America''--I
don't disagree with that--he should start by demanding it of his own
businesses. How can he expect others to do something that he is not
doing? He wants the automobile makers to make cars in America. So do I.
Then he ought to stop making his ties in China and his furniture in
Turkey. He ought to set a good example. Until he totally and completely
divests himself from his businesses, which is the right thing to do, he
ought to start following the rules himself that he has laid out for the
country.
____________________