[Congressional Record Volume 162, Number 177 (Thursday, December 8, 2016)]
[Senate]
[Pages S6907-S6908]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
MORNING BUSINESS
______
RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN EGYPT
Mr. LEAHY. Mr. President, I have visited Egypt many times, and I have
voted for billions of dollars in U.S. assistance for Egypt to support
economic and security programs in that country. I have recognized
positive developments in Egypt when they occur, such as the recent
decision by the government to undertake economic reforms, including by
reducing some subsidies.
I also recognize the security challenges Egypt faces from instability
and violence in Libya and in the Sinai. The U.S. has an interest in
helping Egypt confront these challenges by addressing the underlying
causes in a manner that is consistent with international law.
Today I want to speak briefly about the Egyptian Parliament's recent
passage of a restrictive new law on nongovernmental organizations,
NGOs, that would effectively cripple Egypt's civil society for years to
come. Rather than sign this legislation, I hope President Sisi calls
for a new version to be drafted in cooperation with independent NGOs.
If President Sisi does sign this law, it will be yet another step in
the wrong direction by a government that professes to be making
progress on civil and human rights when the facts indicate otherwise.
[[Page S6908]]
Such a development would be further evidence of the need to strengthen
existing democratic and human rights conditions on U.S. aid for Egypt.
According to information I have received, the law passed by
parliament on November 29 would place all NGOs in Egypt, both local and
foreign, under the supervision and control of a committee that would be
dominated by representatives of the Defense, Interior, and Justice
Ministries, as well as the General Intelligence Service, the country's
top spy agency. Among other things, the law would criminalize work that
harms ``national security, national unity, public morals or public
order'' but leaves those terms undefined, allowing the authorities to
bring such charges against any group they choose. Anyone convicted of
violating the law would face sentences of up to 5 years in prison and a
fine of up to $56,000.
The proposed law comes at a time when independent voices in Egypt are
facing an existential crisis. Instead of passing a new NGO law that
would allow both domestic and international groups to operate without
burdensome restrictions, the Egyptian authorities have escalated their
crackdown on independent NGOs, particularly against groups that focus
on human rights, the rule of law, and democratic norms.
Over the past year, a court has frozen the assets of human rights
groups and the personal assets of human rights defenders. At least 15
NGO founders, leaders, or staff--many from prominent groups--have been
banned from leaving the country. An investigation into the foreign
funding of dozens of local NGOs could result in criminal charges
carrying sentences of up to 25 years in prison. This pattern of
harassment and arrests is not a new phenomenon. It has been happening
for years, and, contrary to representations of Egyptian officials, it
is getting worse.
I urge the Egyptian authorities to adhere to their constitution, and
the pledges they have made in international fora such as the United
Nations Human Rights Council, by guaranteeing freedom of expression and
association. I urge President Sisi to reject this draconian
legislation.
I also want to reiterate what I said in this chamber on September 27,
2016, when I spoke about Aya Hijazi, a young Egyptian American social
worker currently being detained in Egypt.
Ms. Hijazi, along with her Egyptian husband and five employees of
their NGO Belady, has been accused of salacious crimes--accusations
that the government has yet to corroborate with credible evidence in a
court of law. Ms. Hijazi has been jailed and denied due process since
May 21, 2014. She and the other defendants should be released
immediately or provided a fair, public trial so they can defend
themselves.
____________________