[Congressional Record Volume 162, Number 176 (Wednesday, December 7, 2016)]
[Senate]
[Pages S6826-S6827]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
TRIBUTE TO BARBARA BOXER
Mr. DURBIN. Mr. President, in 1922, Rebecca Latimer Felton was the
first woman to sit in the U.S. Senate. She served in this body for only
1 day, but
[[Page S6827]]
during those 24 hours she made a bold prediction for her time about the
future role women would play in the Senate. She said: ``When the women
of the country come in and sit with you . . . you will get ability, you
will get integrity of purpose, you will get exalted patriotism, and you
will get unstinted usefulness.'' I will second that.
Barbara and I served together in the House--and we have served
together in the Senate for 20 years. And let me tell you, no one
embodies Senator Felton's prediction better than Barbara Boxer.
Throughout the years, I have loved getting to know Barbara as a
colleague, but more importantly as a friend. Loretta and I joined
Barbara and her husband, Stu, on official trips, personal vacations and
countless dinners. We have eaten, drank, joked, and bonded. And as her
career in the Senate comes to an end, keeping those bonds of friendship
strong as she heads west is one my life goals.
Barbara made quite an impact on the Senate Chamber before she even
entered this body. On October 9, 1991, the Senate Judiciary Committee
was set to vote on the nomination of Justice Clarence Thomas to serve a
lifetime appointment on the U.S. Supreme Court, without listening to
Professor Anita Hill's allegations of sexual harassment. At the time,
there were two women in the Senate, Barbara Mikulski and Nancy Landon
Kassebaum. Now, while this was going on in the Senate, the women of the
House tried speaking out in that body. They were censured. And they had
enough. So they marched out of the House and over to the Senate--29
women House Members, led by Congresswoman Pat Schroeder from Colorado
and Barbara Boxer from California. American politics has never been the
same.
The following year, a number of esteemed women were elected to the
U.S. Senate. Several reporters deemed 1992: ``the Year of the Woman.''
Senator Mikulski, the dean of women, as she is often referred to, said:
``Calling 1992 the Year of the Woman makes it sound like the Year of
the Caribou or the Year of the Asparagus. We're not a fad, fancy or a
year.'' She was right. But California made history. For the first time,
one State sent two women to represent them in the Senate: Dianne
Feinstein and Barbara Boxer.
Barbara often reminds me of the line from Shakespeare's--A Midsummer
Night's Dream: ``Though she be but little, she is fierce.'' In 1994,
when Republicans took control of Congress, one of the first things they
did was go after environmental regulations, including rules to limit
the amount of arsenic in the drinking water. Barbara immediately
launched a good, old-fashioned, 3-day ``Ms. Smith Goes to Washington''
filibuster. And like most of the fights she takes on, she won.
Barbara is a call-it-as-you-see-it kind of person. Maybe it is
because she grew up in the no-nonsense, working-class town of Brooklyn.
Or maybe it is because her parents and Jewish grandparents, who
immigrated to this country from Russia instilled in her a deep love for
America's Constitution and freedoms--a sense of obligation to give
something back and a determination to fight for underdogs, truth and
justice.
She has sponsored or cosponsored more than 1,200 pieces of
legislation and helped lead the fight on issues ranging from women's
rights to healthcare to protecting California's natural wonders to
keeping lead and other potentially lethal hazards out of children's
toys.
The vote that sealed our spiritual kinship took place in October 2002
when she and I voted against the Iraq war resolution. One of our dear
friends, Paul Wellstone, also voted against the resolution. Paul was in
a tough reelection fight that year. A reporter asked him if it was a
hard choice to vote against the war. Paul said it was a risk, but not a
choice. His conscience wouldn't let him vote any other way. It seems to
me that is how Barbara Boxer approaches every one of her votes in
Congress: It might be a risk, but it is not a choice. She listens to
her conscience, and the people of California respect her for it. But
let me be clear: that doesn't mean she will not work hard to find a
compromise.
She proved that in recent years when she and Jim Inhofe--the
unlikeliest of odd couples--worked together to pass important
legislation updating regulations on toxic chemicals and shepherding
through a surface transportation bill that no one thought could be
done.
I will close with this. Early in Barbara's political career, people
used to come up to her and say: How did you get so strong, how did you
get so tough? Barbara would humbly respond: Oh, not tough. I am just an
ordinary person, and I do what I think is right. I agree with most of
that, but let me tell you--Barbara is as tough as they come. She can't
be bullied or intimidated, and she never loses her courage. I want to
thank Barbara for sacrificing so much time with her own family to make
the families of America safer, healthier, and more hopeful. For that
and a thousand other reasons, I will miss her in the Senate. But I know
I can count on her to keep pushing those of us who remain to listen to
our consciences--to fight for change and do the right thing.
____________________