[Congressional Record Volume 162, Number 169 (Monday, November 28, 2016)]
[Senate]
[Page S6510]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
COMMENTS OF THE SENATOR FROM MASSACHUSETTS
Mr. CORNYN. Mr. President, I confess that I came to the floor to talk
about some of the nominations that we are going to see coming from the
administration, particularly regarding one of our colleagues, Senator
Sessions, the Senator from Alabama, to be the next Attorney General.
I am somewhat taken aback by the nature of the comments that I hear
coming from the Senator from Massachusetts. I had to refresh my memory
of the Senate Standing Rules, which I thought prohibited this sort of
ad hominem attack--the claims of corruption, selling legislation for
campaign contributions. I thought the rules of decorum of the Senate
prohibited that sort of demagoguery.
But I am not sure you can write a rule that would prohibit somebody
who is actually determined to defy the very voters they claim to be
representing. If our Democratic colleagues like the result of the
election that just occurred on November 8, I would say: Keep on keeping
on. Keep on with this same sort of ad hominem attacks and attacking the
motivation of people, rather than talking about policy.
I thought that is what the Senate was supposed to be all about--not
where we come in here and call each other names. It is no wonder that
the American people are turned off by what they see as politics as
usual. I think what they told us on November 8 is that they actually
would like to see us accomplish some things--first of all, starting
with listening to them, not telling them what is good for them and
saying: Well, if you don't like it, you are going to have to take it
because the people in power, the people working in Washington, the
elites in America know better than you do what is good for you.
So when I hear the Senator from Massachusetts come in and give
essentially a political speech, such as she did, not talking about the
merits or the policy but rather making personal attacks against
Senators and people who support the policy, I just think this is
beneath the dignity of the Senate.
I would hope we would rise to the occasion, in the wake of this
historic election and say: You know what, we can do better. The
American people deserve better than what they have been getting coming
out of Washington. The only way we are going to be able to turn this
country around is by, first of all, listening to what the American
people are telling us. We know what they said is this: We are not happy
with the direction of the country, and we are not happy with what is
happening in Washington.
To come in and make the kind of speeches that I just heard a moment
ago is disturbing. It is disappointing. We can do better than that. We
must do better than that if we are going to regain the confidence of
the American people that we are actually worthy of their support as we
try to guide this ship of state and try to pass laws that actually will
improve the quality of their lives by growing the economy, by making it
possible for people to find work who want work so they can provide for
their families, to try to make sure that the American people are safe
and secure, and to provide for our common defense.
Those are the sorts of things we ought to be focused on. So it is a
little distressing to walk into this Chamber, in what used to be known
as the world's greatest deliberative body, and to hear the sort of
diatribe and the personal attacks and the name calling that we just
heard from the Senator from Massachusetts.
____________________