[Congressional Record Volume 162, Number 146 (Tuesday, September 27, 2016)]
[Senate]
[Pages S6092-S6093]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
CONTINUING RESOLUTION
Mr. REID. Mr. President, the Republican leader just said: What are
the Democrats trying to do, have built-in dysfunction?
During the 8 years I was majority leader, we had to overcome 644
filibusters led by the Republicans--644. A comparable time: Lyndon
Johnson, who was the majority leader for 6 years, had to overcome one
and, arguably, two filibusters. Two compared to 644, so don't lecture
us on building dysfunction. They have invented it in the modern Senate.
This afternoon the Senate will vote on cloture on the CR proposed by
the Republicans. I appreciate the good work done by appropriators, on
our side lead by Senator Mikulski. They have done good work, and
tremendous progress has been made.
The Republican proposal will likely fail to get cloture this
afternoon, and for good reason. The Republican legislation misses the
mark. It seeks to keep in place the status quo with regard to
undisclosed, unaccountable dark money that is flooding our political
system.
On the way to work this morning, I learned that the National Rifle
Association is placing another $1 million of TV ads in Nevada. We all
know that the National Rifle Association was really good at direct
mailing. They raised that money from their members. That is not how it
works now. Most of the NRA money comes from the Koch brothers. We are
fortunate there are not two Trumps. That is the dark money we are
talking about. Those ads will say NRA, but it is not NRA money. The ads
will say the Chamber of Commerce, but it is not Chamber of Commerce
money. It is all Koch money. It is how it works with the dark money,
nondisclosed money. And the provision my friend the Republican leader
has to have in this resolution is this: The Securities and Exchange
Commission will be powerless to tell corporations that they have to
disclose their campaign contributions. They have to disclose everything
else at their shareholders meeting, but not that; oh, no, that would be
terrible, any type of disclosure. We want to keep all of this money out
there dark, secret--no one knows. All of these phony names they
advertise are just so unfair.
The Republican bill includes a rider to the government funding bill
that prevents shareholders from knowing how their money is being used
in political campaigns. Again, the Republican leader is trying to shut
the door on disclosure.
The Republican continuing resolution also ignores the 2\1/2\-year
crisis in Flint, MI. Lead has poisoned all 100,000 people--almost
10,000 children, some of whom are babies. Lead is a killer for
children. After a short period of time--a month, a few weeks--a child
who ingests lead in any way, whether they are eating paint off the
floor but certainly drinking water, will be affected the rest of their
lives. They will not be as smart as they could be; they will not be as
agile as they could be. It really hurts them. And it is not good for
adults. So after 2\1/2\ years, don't those people deserve something?
The Republican leader said there is a water resources development
bill, and I acknowledge that. I think good work was done to get that
passed. I said yesterday, and I will say again today, that I appreciate
the work of Senator Inhofe. He has worked with one of the most liberal
Members of the Senate, Barbara Boxer, and he is one of the most
conservative, and they did good work and I appreciate it very much. But
would it be asking too much for the Speaker of the House and the
Republican leader of the Senate to stand and say: We are going to get
that thing done. We are going to pass it; we are going to make sure
that the bill that passed overwhelmingly here in the Senate is going to
become law. But they ignored that. They ignored the people of Flint.
We are happy to help with the disaster that took place in Louisiana.
Since the Republican leader is here, we have been happy to help with
all of the problems, the emergencies they have had in Texas. We stepped
up to the plate, and we took care of that. We were happy to do that in
Louisiana.
This will not be the reason I will not support this legislation, but
I think Louisiana deserved more than what is in this bill. The
emergency declaration for them is $2.8 billion, and in this bill there
is $500 million, and they will get most of that. A little bit will go
to West Virginia, and some--a little bit, even less--will go to
Maryland. It will be distributed on a proportionate basis. But couldn't
they help Flint?
Here was the response of the junior Senator from Louisiana: That is
someone else's grief. That is what he said: That is someone else's
grief. Louisiana wasn't someone else's grief when the hurricanes
struck. It was our grief. The junior Senator from Louisiana should
understand that he is a U.S. Senator, not a State senator from
Louisiana. It is not someone else's grief; it is our grief.
The Republicans are essentially saying that disasters in our States
are more important than disasters in your State. It is unfair and it is
wrong.
This morning my leadership team sent a letter to the Republican
leader. Durbin, Schumer, and Murray--they sent a letter to the
Republican leader encouraging the Republicans to come back and give us
a solution for the people of Flint.
After the vote on the Republican CR this afternoon, I encourage my
Republican colleagues to help us have some degree of certainty that the
people of Flint will be helped. It is not deficit spending even though
it is an emergency. I believe it should be taken care of just like we
had taken care of Louisiana. It is paid for. In fact, I commend
Senators Stabenow and Peters for taking money from a program they have
in Michigan to pay for this. It is not deficit spending. Why can't we
do it? The reasons are apparent, and that is too bad.
This doesn't need to be a manufactured crisis. We know the
Republicans know how to close the Senate. They did it for 17 days, and
they have done it another time. We don't need to have this manufactured
crisis. We want to make sure that Flint has some degree of certainty
that after 2\1/2\ years they would get some help. We need to work
together to keep our government properly funded and the people of Flint
protected. Certainly, we should be able to do that.
[[Page S6093]]
____________________