[Congressional Record Volume 162, Number 145 (Monday, September 26, 2016)]
[House]
[Pages H5907-H5911]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
{time} 1945
AMERICA HAS NOT FORGOTTEN YOU
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under the Speaker's announced policy of
January 6, 2015, the gentleman from Nebraska (Mr. Fortenberry) is
recognized for 60 minutes as the designee of the majority leader.
Mr. FORTENBERRY. Mr. Speaker, a friend of mine works part time in a
hardware store. He is retired from several other careers, but he
continues to enjoy helping people in a retail-service environment.
Recently, he kindly gave me, as we were talking about gardening, some
hosta plants that he had grown. As I drove through his neighborhood
looking for his house, I suspected his home was the one flying the
large American flag. I knew that Mike, my friend, had served in
Vietnam, but, as we spent some time digging up the plants and visiting
around his garden, I learned a lot more about his harrowing experience
as a marine.
You see, Mr. Speaker, Mike's squad was assigned to protect an area in
the northern part of south Vietnam. They were a pesky bunch, as Mike
put it, and the north Vietnamese grew tired of the constant haranguing,
so they launched a counterassault. Mike's squad was outnumbered 10 to
1, and they were hit pretty hard. A call went out for help, but the
first helicopter to arrive was blown apart.
Mike sustained severe wounds. A bullet to the chest collapsed his
lung, shrapnel tore through a foot and a leg, and another bullet grazed
his head. To breathe, Mike had to keep clearing his throat with his
finger to remove the gurgling blood. And at the point where he could no
longer physically fight, he crawled to a slightly more secure place and
propped himself up on a sack. Mike told me he remembered two things--
the wind blowing through his hair and his mother. Who would tell her
that he had died?
Only three Americans survived that battle. Fortunately, another
helicopter quickly landed and a corpsman came to Mike's rescue,
stabilized him, and helped return him to safety. A doctor performed
quick and precision surgery, and the medical personnel nursed him back
to health, for which Mike was always grateful.
But something always nagged him. He never got a chance to thank the
corpsman who risked his own life to save him. And, finally, in 2001, he
went online, did some research, and found the man 30 years later. Mike
wrote to him and said: I have not forgotten you.
[[Page H5908]]
Now, Mr. Speaker, it is no secret that our country's economic,
political, and cultural settlement is straining under a number of very
harsh realities. Concentration of economic and political power, coupled
with signs of social collapse, are contributing to a growing sense of
vulnerability and anxiety in our society. Amid a divisive and
disorienting political season, terrorist attacks in San Bernardino,
Orlando, Minnesota, and New York have reminded us of the grave threats
to life and our cherished liberties.
Take a moment, Mr. Speaker, to notice how many Nebraskans and how
many Americans like Mike fly our flag. It means something. The flag
stands for an ideal, for a value, for the proposition that all persons
have dignity. And when that dignity is safeguarded, a people can
flourish. That is America. But I think more people need to hear, Mr.
Speaker, that we have not forgotten you. The fundamental questions
right now before us are, who are we as a Nation, where are we going as
a people, and how will we find our greatness again?
Yesterday, Mr. Speaker, I had an extraordinary privilege. I would
like to share the story with you and the body. I was invited to attend
the dedication of a new veterans memorial in a small town in the heart
of the Great Plains north of Lincoln, Nebraska, where I live. This town
is called Wahoo. It was actually made famous because in the old David
Letterman show he named it as the hometown office.
But Wahoo is more than a late night show's joke. It is a place where
a community lives, works, and has a deep sense of interconnectedness
and well-being. It is a place of extraordinary greatness. In this small
town, about 500 people from the entire county came and gathered right
there at the courthouse for the dedication of a new memorial honoring
the 101 servicemembers who had been killed from the small farming
community and the surrounding area--soldiers, troops, military
personnel from World War I to our present day. All of their names were
read in an honor roll, many having Czech and German names, who were
such an important part of the original settlement of that area, as well
as the Swedish.
When I approached the microphone to say a few words, I recalled the
old movie ``To Kill a Mockingbird,'' based upon the old novel. Mr.
Speaker, as you will recall, in that movie, the lawyer Atticus Finch
gives a defense of a man who is unjustly accused of a crime. The
community from which that man had come had to sit in the upper balcony
of the courtroom because of the prejudice of that time. And as Atticus
Finch was getting ready to leave the courtroom, the reverend, who was
in the midst of that community in the gallery, says to his young child,
the lawyer's young child: ``Stand up, your father's passing.''
At that beautiful ceremony right there in the Great Plains, it
started with the public high school choir and the Catholic high school
choir singing our national anthem. When that occurred, no one sat on a
bench, no one took a knee. We all stood because it was not about us, it
was about them, the men and women before us, living and dead, who had
answered the call to service. And whether they had cooked or cleaned or
computed or were in the worst conceivable firefight, nonetheless, they
said: yes, I will serve, I will sacrifice, for the meaning of our
Nation.
We live in a time, Mr. Speaker, when our world is screaming for
meaning. What we are really searching for is not an answer that can be
found here in this body. We have an important role to debate the most
pressing issues of the day, whether those are national security,
economic security, and even cultural security. The most important
answers aren't found necessarily down the street in the White House.
They are not going to be answered necessarily in the great debate that
is about to occur moments from now on the television. The answer is
found in the debate about meaning itself.
When we find things that bind us, like this extraordinary ceremony
yesterday nestled in the heart of America, where people young and old
came to honor our veterans, when we look back to those who came before
us, giving them their due in a memorial that appropriately honors them,
we bind ourselves in a noble idea that sacrifice for one another,
sacrifice, even for a nation, is sometimes not only necessary, but it
is worthy of the fullness of the call in the human heart.
But we still have hard questions before us. So what should we do? The
first pathway, Mr. Speaker, to finding solutions is to adequately
identify the problem. And in one word, I believe the problem is
fragmentation.
What do I mean by that? It is a creeping separateness, whether in
economic affairs, government affairs, foreign affairs, or our own basic
exchanges in local community life. People are feeling alone, isolated.
In many cases, they feel like they lack control over the most basic
things, the simple things in their own life.
Far remote systems seem to be the new governing order. Informative
institutions that used to provide the continuity of tradition and nest
people into an ongoing desire and pathway toward hope by giving them
the gifts of that tradition and the responsibility nested within
community, as well as the accountability, have all become fragmented.
These burdens press upon our people in a most profound way, and, in
particular, in regards to their own economic well-being.
These days, economic measures are on everyone's mind. There is a
tremendous amount of anxiety, even hopelessness, in our uncertain
times. And while the stock market has certainly rebounded and corporate
profits have soured, many families are facing downward mobility,
stagnant wages, decreased opportunity, the feeling of
disenfranchisement, and the inability to achieve financial security.
Part of our problem is our country's damaged micro-enterprise sector,
that entrepreneurial space where most new jobs in the country are
actually created. And we are not even talking about corporations that
are 100 to 500 employees. We are talking about shops that are 1 to 5
people.
This morning, I made a phone call as I was getting on the plane to
return here from Nebraska because, Mr. Speaker, I received this in the
mail. This is a flyer announcing a doors-closing sale from a small
business called Havelock Furniture. This furniture company anchors the
north end of a little community called Havelock, which is now subsumed
into the greater community of Lincoln, Nebraska.
It distressed me when I received this. At first, I thought they might
be another victim of corporate consolidation, an inability to compete
as a small furniture store in a sector that might be, again, increasing
the concentration into fewer and fewer hands.
So I just picked up the phone, and I called Sue. Now, this is an
advertisement for a closing-business sale, and it is giving me a
discount if I want to come there and buy something. But Sue lays out,
in very heartfelt terms, the reality of their circumstances: The family
has been in business for 61 years, and now I am retiring forever. She
goes on to say: And I am offering our friends and employees and
preferred customers a special discount.
Well, I can't ever recall if I have met Sue. And, by the way, at the
top of this, Mr. Speaker--I don't know if you can see it--is a picture
of the founder, Mel Everson, and it says: In loving memory. As I
recall, Sue is his daughter.
I called Sue just to find out what was going on, and also to express
my thanks for their willingness to be in business this long, carry on
an important tradition for an important part of our town, and be an
integrated part of an old Main Street that still occupies a unique part
of the community where I live.
We talked a little bit about what happened. And, fortunately, it
wasn't the result of any type of pressure coming from outside economic
forces that were beyond her control, it was simply the necessary
decision that had to be made for family reasons. But, nonetheless, I
felt a heartfelt loss. And why? Because on a deeper level, Sue's
business is the loss of a symbol of community mutuality and economic
affairs, a gathering place where human interaction reinforces social
vibrancy.
Mr. Speaker, our country needs a 21st century vision of what economic
success can look like. Benign competition with a robust small business
sector creates the conditions for a sustainable dynamism, a humane
economy that prioritizes personal relationships and
[[Page H5909]]
community ties, fosters stronger entrepreneurialism, forges better
consumer products, and creates more jobs for persons who need them.
{time} 2000
Just as a healthy society and the principle of self-responsibility
are the preconditions for prosperity, properly ordered markets support
social cohesion. Markets at their best are driven by startup innovation
and sustained by widespread ownership. The return of small business,
with a new participatory economy, can extend the dignity and just
rewards of meaningful work. It will help us fight poverty and help us
to rebuild our economy in this century.
Now, what are some good examples of this economic mutuality I am
referring to where no person or no thing is thrown away?
I recently saw a presentation by a CEO of a major corporation. He
threw up a PowerPoint on the screen, and I thought we were getting
ready to look at some boring quarterly earnings projections or
something like that; but instead of rolling out the PowerPoints and
graphs, the CEO showed a simple picture. It was a picture of a young
woman on her wedding day, a bride on her father's arm.
The CEO then said this: ``Everyone is someone's daughter. Everyone is
someone's son.'' In other words, persons matter--persons matter in a
society; persons matter in a business; persons matter as we debate the
great public policy issues before us because, ultimately, that is the
purpose, the well-being of persons.
The point was powerfully made. The understanding of work and the
workplace--the proper understanding of work as nested within the
workplace--are essential to human dignity and to human happiness; and
this CEO of a very large corporation said he believed business could be
the greatest force for good in the world. That is a strong and proper
perspective.
Mr. Speaker, as I was recently looking around my garage, looking to
clean out a few things, I came upon an old, antiquated pickax. It is
really a substantial piece of hardware. I bought this years ago and
used it numbers of times in my yard. Then the handle finally broke, and
I had a hard time throwing it away--it is a bad habit I have, I guess.
But it sat there in my garage, a substantial piece of iron. So, instead
of throwing it away, I took it with me to the local hardware store, and
then I went to look at some new ones.
I asked the clerk: ``What do you think? Do you sell handles?''
He said: ``No, we do not sell new handles.'' He said: ``You are
probably better off buying a new one and putting this one on the wall
in the man cave.'' So I went and looked at a new one and toyed with the
idea; but then the clerk said: ``Well, look. Let me do a little
research for you, and I will get back to you.''
So he did. He went out and found a company in America that made
pickax handles out of hickory. He took it a little further. He went
ahead and ordered the handle for me, and he replaced it himself. When I
went to the store about week later, there it was--a piece of old, old
hardware, ready to be put back to work with a replacement handle
proudly made in America and made of hickory.
If you had done a straight analysis of the cost involved in this
repair project, it was not worth it. I only saved about $10 by
repairing versus buying a new one. I had to wait a week or so, and I
had to go to the store twice, but there are unmeasured benefits here.
Let's talk about those. First of all, an old piece of iron is not in a
landfill; a renewable resource of hickory wood was deployed; an
American company made a little profit; and the hardware store's clerk
had the satisfaction of a hand-built opportunity. I will tell you, I
must say, I am pretty proud of my refreshed, repurposed pickax, and I
put it right to work on some old bushes I had in the yard.
More importantly, Mr. Speaker, if we are going to rebuild our
economy, thinking about how we manufacture, how we maintain, and how we
rebuild what is still useful can unlock the benefits of a well-
functioning market system. This small act of taking something old but
solid and getting it back into useful service provides some insights on
how to better secure economic well-being. The disposable nature of so
many goods as they are now manufactured, with the intended life
expectancy ever more narrowed, decreases costs in the short term--but
cheaper isn't always best. The ability to repair and recycle and to
repurpose--to keep the useful life of a resource as long as possible--
is smart economics. It is a fundamental principle of conservation, and
it is a key to reviving the small business service sector.
Perhaps, Mr. Speaker, this is an emerging trend. I was watching the
Olympics. During it, I noticed a commercial in which a major retailer
gave a subtle message about cheap imports. During the commercial, as
the song ``Dream On'' built up steadily in the background, the
commercial featured people waking up, going about the routine of life,
getting their kids to school, and making their way to a factory, where
they used their hands to make things--tough and gritty work, but
connected to a deeper meaning. At the end of the commercial, the
company stated it will invest $250 billion in American manufacturing in
the years to come. Maybe we are on the front end of a trend, Mr.
Speaker. I certainly hope so.
An economic model that chases more and more output alone is not a
valid measure of value. Our country's economic reboot requires a return
to a humane economy--one focused on quality, durability, and the work
of human hands and, as much as we can, made in America. Without this
focus, we will forever chase that which we cannot find, and perhaps
more and more people are realizing that we should shift to what is
dependable, not disposable; to what is fixable, not forgettable; to
what is reparable and not just replaceable. Using my repurposed
hickory-handled, American-made pickax gives me a great deal of time to
think about these things, Mr. Speaker. It also gives me a pretty good
workout--a winner all the way around.
Mr. Speaker, I want to reference something else that I happened to
see. There is a show--I am not sure if it is still on--that is called
``Undercover Boss,'' and I have seen it a few times. I find the program
to be quite engaging and very, very human. The premise of the show is
that the CEO, the chief executive officer, of a major company goes
undercover as an employee. Then, from there, he participates in the
gritty work of building things, of cleaning up, of working the phones,
and of performing basic administrative tasks.
During this particular episode that I saw, the boss spent some time
out in the field, repairing a broken sewer line. Then he was in an
office, answering calls, and was at a manufacturing plant where the
equipment was crafted. The CEO was assigned to one of the company's top
welders for training at the manufacturing facility. As part of his
disguise, he wore safety glasses and a do-rag. The first mistake that
the CEO made was that of burning a hole through the metal that he was
supposed to be joining. After the welder who was supervising him gently
corrected his technique, they took a break, and the conversation turned
to job security.
The middle-aged welder, who was a long-time, dedicated employee and a
team leader at that corporation, told the boss about the worry that he
has and that he overhears at the manufacturing plant. Would they just
show up one day and see a ``closed'' sign hanging on the cyclone fence?
Given what is going on in America, no one knows for sure whether the
company would just pack up and move overseas like so many others have.
The simple conversation in the break room in middle America captured
what so many Americans are justifiably concerned about. Although the
government's aggregate statistics show an overall unemployment rate of
about 5 percent, the numbers hide a disturbing reality. For too many
people, the rhetoric of free markets has not translated into better
opportunity or security. As I mentioned, stagnant wages and downward
mobility, staggering student loan debt, job insecurity, and the
increased cost of living are all real difficulties marking the new
normal for an increasing number of families in our society.
In another segment of the television show, the disguised CEO had to
work on a home drainage system. The elderly woman who lived in the
well-kept
[[Page H5910]]
but very simple house was told that the bill to fix the problem was
$1,200. She responded in a very worried voice about her many doctor
bills and about how much medicine she had to buy. The employee who was
supervising the CEO then paused, considered the situation, and gently
spoke back to the elderly woman and said to her: ``Well, how about
$500?'' The employee, as it turns out, had taken it upon himself to cut
his own commission in order to help this elderly, vulnerable person,
all while his undercover boss watched.
After several other meaningful encounters with his employees, the
show concluded with the CEO's revealing his true identity and
commending everyone with whom he had interacted. He made some poignant
points about his experiences--how deeply they had touched his life and
how they would now impact his management style. To the welder, he said:
``I want you to take the message back: `We are staying in America.'
Give them that assurance from me.'' To the man who reduced the bill at
the cost of his own salary, he rewarded him for his compassion and
dedication.
Business can be a force for great good, Mr. Speaker. The true
potential of companies depends upon their people for their greatness.
In this case, the CEO was willing to do a self-evaluation of his own
leadership style and of the very fundamental purpose of the company,
itself. Perhaps a scorecard should be kept to feature businesses that
do the right thing: trying to keep the best jobs in America,
consistently innovating, and paying just salaries to persons who work
hard to support themselves and their families.
In order to discover--to discover, perhaps, something about himself,
to discover the true meaning of work, to discover the true value of the
persons under his authority--the CEO went undercover. By doing so, he
found what he had not seen: a properly functioning market economy that
genuinely works for both profits and persons, repairing fractures in
our society, and enhancing community interdependency. That is the
point, Mr. Speaker: community interdependency is the true source of our
Nation's strength.
When I was a much younger man, I owned a rear-wheel drive Ford Bronco
II. They don't make them anymore. I loved that little truck. I sold it
shortly after I was married. That little truck was great for that time
in my life, but navigating winter conditions could be a bit tough. One
night, while traveling on an interstate during really forboding
weather, I came over the crest of a hill, and what lay before me was
surreal. It must have happened just seconds before. A large 18-wheeler
truck had jackknifed. Cars were spun in every direction, flung into the
median. There was a clear sheet of ice that no one had expected.
{time} 2015
In an instant, my reality changed. In an instant, everything changed.
I had to make a choice. I rapidly decreased my speed, gripped the
wheel, and focused my total attention on the road before me only just
barely navigating the treachery.
Mr. Speaker, many Americans feel that they have been tossed around in
a bewildering unpredictability of our current policy, economic, and
political dynamics. Many Americans are looking for new leadership that
offers a compelling, inspirational, and stable vision that can restore
the true security of our Nation. If we so choose, one of the strengths
of the American system of government is its capacity for constant
replenishment.
In the midst of an unpredictable government transition season, it may
sound a bit peculiar to speak of opportunity. But could this moment
give us the chance, as a people, to reassess and realign? Perhaps so,
if we so choose.
As we began this conversation, Mr. Speaker, I talked about pointing
to the problems in order to understand solutions. I think a stronger
America might be glimpsed through four mutually supporting principles:
government decentralization, economic patriotism, foreign policy
realism, and social conservation.
Mr. Speaker, just like every football game has four quarters, let's
think of our solutions as our four-quarter game plan: government
decentralization, economic patriotism, foreign policy realism, and
social conservation. What do I mean?
First, a return to a more decentralized form of government will
restore an important source of America's strength. I, in no way, wish
to belittle the essential important debates that occur in this body and
elsewhere in the Federal Government. We have a role. We have a role to
create the conditions so that the rest of society can flourish. The
ultimate role we have is to seek justice and the just structures that
can bring about order for persons and communities to flourish.
When the Federal Government grows beyond its effectiveness, it
infringes upon basic liberties, it stifles innovation, it crushes
creativity, and it also takes away the responsibility that we have for
one another. A creeping tendency to nationalize every conceivable type
of problem erodes community resolve.
Now, while the Federal Government does have a central role in
maintaining the guardrails for stability, the rule of law, and a fair
opportunity economy, America's governing system is designed to operate
most effectively at different levels. Those close to an opportunity or
a problem ought to have the first authority to seize the opportunity or
solve the problem. I find it notable that the veterans memorial
ceremony that I went to just yesterday did not include any government
funds. It was made up of community resolve and community sacrifice.
As a quick civics lesson, as an aside, the Rules Committee on which
the gentleman from Georgia sits is still working tonight, trying to
craft the structure for the debate that will occur on certain pieces of
legislation to come before us in short order.
Let me return to something I said, Mr. Speaker. Just like every
football game has four quarters, I believe we ought to think of our
solutions as a four-quarter game plan. The first is returning to a
healthy concept of decentralized government, a healthy Federalism where
those closest to a responsibility or opportunity have first-order
priority in taking responsibility or seizing that opportunity, again,
not to denigrate the very essential role that the Federal Government
plays in creating the conditions for stability and rule of law and a
just playing field, particularly in the economy, as well as national
security, but other levels of governance are essential to community
well-being.
Second, economic inclusion or economic patriotism should help America
recover from an arthritic economy. As I mentioned earlier, although the
government's aggregate statistics show an overall unemployment rate at
about 5 percent, these numbers continue to hide certain realities.
There are stagnant wages and downward mobility making life very
difficult for a number of families.
Mr. Speaker, it is sad to say this, but this Washington-Wall Street
axis, which promotes the transnational corporation as the new ruling
entity for society, cannot secure the well-being of our economy. They
cannot. Instead of a globalized supply-side elitism, America needs a
vibrant marketplace of her own that expands the space for constructive
interdependency and community dynamism which will fight poverty and
drive innovation, at the heart of which, again, is small business.
Small business is the key, along with a fair regulatory environment
and the right type of healthcare reform that will actually end up
decreasing cost, while protecting vulnerable persons and reset the
architecture so that we have a 21st century healthcare system that is
truly just, that is fair, that is actually going to achieve the
conditions for creativity and innovation in the marketplace. What we
have now is a healthcare system that is an increasing drag on the small
business sector; and, therefore, the number of jobs that we see created
are going down. We are living in an entrepreneurial winter--the number
of jobs being created are less from small businesses, are less than the
number of small businesses that are actually dying. We are in an
entrepreneurial winter. This has never happened before in the history
of our country.
So, focusing on the small business sector and returning to, again, a
fair regulatory environment and appropriately addressing a new
architecture for health care, which doesn't simply shift costs but, at
its heart, protects vulnerable persons, improves
[[Page H5911]]
healthcare outcomes and reduces cost is a key to restoring the small
business sector.
Third key is foreign policy realism. What do I mean? Foreign policy
realism charts a course between overinterventionalism and isolationism.
America has an important role to play on the global stage today.
However, many Americans are alarmed at an exhausted, drifting, and
often counterproductive foreign policy. The posture of foreign policy
adventurism, sometimes coupled with naive assumptions about democracy
promotion, requires a recalibration. Leveraging American strength
through strategic international relationships and authentic friendships
will help us navigate the 21st century marked by a changing
geopolitical framework. Mr. Speaker, I believe in the three Ds: strong
defense, smart diplomacy, sustainable development. That is the right
balance in our foreign policy considerations.
Fourth key is social conservation. Social conservation provides the
conditions for order, opportunity, and happiness. We usually don't put
those together, social and conservation. We think of conservation as
the important protection of our land and water and the air we breathe,
not throwing things away unnecessarily. Thinking of the ideals of the
ecosystem where all things are interdependent, or looking out into the
vast horizons of nature and letting it pull ourselves to a higher realm
of that which is beautiful, even that which is divine, we have all had
that experience. We know it in nature. We see it.
Could we possibly see the idea of an ecosystem of community where we
actually think that it is more than politics for the promotion of
sustainable values? As society has become more fragmented, it is harder
and harder for us to craft policies that meet society's needs.
Washington cannot spend enough fast enough to fix the deep wounds in
our culture, Mr. Speaker.
Social conservation recognizes that family life, faith life, and
civic life provide a continuity of tradition, giving meaning to life
and creating stability, particularly for children. Those of us who have
had the scarring experience of coming from broken situations, we know
this intuitively. Those of us who struggled with the deep scars of
having what you know and what keeps you safe torn from you, we know
that the formative institutions that preserve the good are invaluable
to opportunities later in life.
Our sense of well-being, the strength of our Nation ultimately does
depend upon the strength of the formative institutions that give rise
to family life, faith life, and civic life. That is the strength of
America.
We are confronting intensifying struggles about the direction of our
country, and the fault lines are, sadly, widened. I think there are
things that still bind us. I would like to think that what I am saying
speaks to every Member of Congress here, that it transcends the
superficial political boundaries that we set up that are, yes, based
upon the different philosophical perspectives on the nature of what
Washington ought to be and not. But I would like to think, again, that
this rises above, because they are binding elements of the human heart.
It is what we all long for: to be nested, to be secure within a
community of loving persons around us who care enough to hold us
accountable, who care enough to demand that we take responsibility for
them and with them.
Although we are encountering rough weather in our country, we can
choose to rediscover this best sense of ourselves. We can choose to
rediscover commonsense governance, which will uphold these ideals and
be built upon them. We can choose right-sized economic models. We can
choose to rediscover universal foundational values that are consistent
with the desire of all persons' hearts. This is how the greatness can
be restored again. This is how we make America great again. This is how
we find ourselves and find one another and find a vision that binds us
together and makes us all proud to stand as America's flag is flown.
Mr. Speaker, I yield back the balance of my time.
____________________