[Congressional Record Volume 162, Number 144 (Thursday, September 22, 2016)]
[House]
[Page H5806]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
UNHCR'S BASH ISRAEL DAY
The SPEAKER pro tempore. The Chair recognizes the gentlewoman from
Florida (Ms. Ros-Lehtinen) for 5 minutes.
Ms. ROS-LEHTINEN. Mr. Speaker, this week, world leaders are gathering
in New York for the United Nations General Assembly, and throughout
this whole process we are reminded yet again of just how broken the
U.N. system really is.
Nowhere is this more evident than at the U.N. Human Rights Council.
What a misnomer. This body that is supposed to promote and defend human
rights worldwide has become a tool used by human rights abusers. And
the office that provides support to the Council, the Office of the High
Commissioner for Human Rights, OHCHR, is no better, as it is overrun
with an anti-Israel bias and an anti-Israel agenda.
We see this play out each time the Council meets for its Bash Israel
Day--yippee--a day dedicated to permanent Agenda Item 7, the only
agenda item of the Council devoted to a single country, Israel.
This year marks the 10th anniversary of the Council. In those 10
years, Mr. Speaker, there have been over 70 resolutions condemning
Israel and about 65 resolutions for all of the other countries
combined. Seventy on Israel, 65 for every other country. Countries like
China, Russia, Vietnam, Saudi Arabia, Venezuela, and Cuba use the
Council as a way to detract attention from their abuses and play upon
the natural anti-Israel bias at the Council and the OHCHR.
So tomorrow, when the Council meets to discuss Agenda Item 7, it will
be another Bash Israel Day that the administration failed to prevent.
It will be another example of how this administration's influence fails
to protect our friend and ally, the democratic Jewish State of Israel.
Instead of continuing to legitimize this sham of a body, Congress
must withhold all contributions and participation at the Council and to
the OHCHR, and call for the dissolution of the Council. The
administration must press the High Commissioner to denounce Agenda Item
7 and work against the inherent anti-Israel bias of the Council and the
Office of the High Commissioner of Human Rights.
Earlier this year, Canadian Professor Michael Lynk was appointed as
the Special Rapporteur for the Palestinian territories, despite his
obvious bias and conflicts of interest, which we now know he lied about
in his paperwork. This selection was so egregious that Canada's Foreign
Minister from Professor Lynk's home country urged the U.N. to
reconsider his appointment. The administration should echo those calls,
but, instead, it has been silent.
The administration should also lead an opposition to the upcoming
reelection next week of Jean Ziegler as an adviser to the Council.
Ziegler is a notorious puppet of the Castro regime and an avowed
defender of dictators and apologists for Islamic extremist groups and
had no business being elected the first time around, let alone being
reelected.
The Obama administration had an opportunity to block his candidacy
while serving as the coordinator for the Western European and Others
Group this year at the Council, but failed to do so; and now it looks
as if Ziegler's reelection is a done deal, thanks to the
administration's failure to act.
The administration, Mr. Speaker, continues to argue that only by
being engaged and only by being full members of the U.N. can it advance
our interests and protect Israel. Yet, next month, UNESCO is set to
adopt a resolution that seeks to whitewash the Jewish and Christian
religious and historical ties to Jerusalem. And while we might not be
voting members of the full UNESCO body, this administration is an
active member of UNESCO's executive committee, where this resolution
was first approved.
Where was our influence then?
We can't even prevent a resolution that wipes away Jewish and
Christian ties to Jerusalem, despite these being historical facts. It
is very apparent that either the administration has no influence at the
U.N. or the administration has no desire to upset the entrenched and
damaged status quo.
That is why it is up to Congress, Mr. Speaker, to force the change at
the U.N. I urge all of my colleagues to take a long, hard look at the
Human Rights Council as a representation of all that is wrong and bad
with the U.N., and to make reforming the U.N. a priority going forward.
It will be up to us.
____________________