[Congressional Record Volume 162, Number 114 (Thursday, July 14, 2016)]
[Senate]
[Page S5114]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
CLOTURE MOTION
Mr. McCONNELL. Madam President, I move to proceed to the motion to
reconsider the vote on the motion to invoke cloture on the motion to
proceed to H.R. 5293.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The question is on agreeing to the motion.
The motion was agreed to.
Mr. McCONNELL. Madam President, I move to reconsider the vote on the
motion to invoke cloture on the motion to proceed to H.R. 5293.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The question is on agreeing to the motion.
The motion was agreed to.
Order of Business
Mr. McCONNELL. For the information of all Senators, the next and
final vote will be cloture on the MILCON-VA-Zika proposal at 2 o'clock.
That will be it for the week.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Pursuant to rule XXII, the Chair lays before
the Senate the pending cloture motion, which the clerk will state.
The legislative clerk read as follows:
Cloture Motion
We, the undersigned Senators, in accordance with the
provisions of rule XXII of the Standing Rules of the Senate,
do hereby move to bring to a close debate on the motion to
proceed to Calendar No. 524, H.R. 5293, an act making
appropriations for the Department of Defense for the fiscal
year ending September 30, 2017, and for other purposes.
Mitch McConnell, Tom Cotton, Shelley Moore Capito, Mike
Crapo, Thad Cochran, Jerry Moran, Richard C. Shelby,
John Hoeven, Lamar Alexander, Orrin G. Hatch, Daniel
Coats, Pat Roberts, John Barrasso, Bill Cassidy, John
Thune, John Boozman, John Cornyn.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. By unanimous consent, the mandatory quorum
call has been waived.
The question is, Is it the sense of the Senate that debate on the
motion to proceed to H.R. 5293, an act making appropriations for the
Department of Defense for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2017,
and for other purposes, shall be brought to a close, upon
consideration?
The yeas and nays are mandatory under the rule.
The clerk will call the roll.
The senior assistant legislative clerk called the roll.
Mr. CORNYN. The following Senator is necessarily absent: the Senator
from Utah (Mr. Lee).
Mr. DURBIN. I announce that the Senator from Minnesota (Mr. Franken)
and the Senator from Minnesota (Ms. Klobuchar) are necessarily absent.
The PRESIDING OFFICER (Mrs. Ernst). Are there any other Senators in
the Chamber desiring to vote?
The result was announced--yeas 55, nays 42, as follows:
[Rollcall Vote No. 133 Leg.]
YEAS--55
Alexander
Ayotte
Barrasso
Blunt
Boozman
Burr
Capito
Cassidy
Coats
Cochran
Collins
Corker
Cornyn
Cotton
Crapo
Cruz
Daines
Donnelly
Enzi
Ernst
Fischer
Flake
Gardner
Graham
Grassley
Hatch
Heller
Hoeven
Inhofe
Isakson
Johnson
Kirk
Lankford
Manchin
McCain
McConnell
Moran
Murkowski
Paul
Perdue
Portman
Risch
Roberts
Rounds
Rubio
Sasse
Scott
Sessions
Shelby
Sullivan
Thune
Tillis
Toomey
Vitter
Wicker
NAYS--42
Baldwin
Bennet
Blumenthal
Booker
Boxer
Brown
Cantwell
Cardin
Carper
Casey
Coons
Durbin
Feinstein
Gillibrand
Heinrich
Heitkamp
Hirono
Kaine
King
Leahy
Markey
McCaskill
Menendez
Merkley
Mikulski
Murphy
Murray
Nelson
Peters
Reed
Reid
Sanders
Schatz
Schumer
Shaheen
Stabenow
Tester
Udall
Warner
Warren
Whitehouse
Wyden
NOT VOTING--3
Franken
Klobuchar
Lee
The PRESIDING OFFICER. On this vote, the yeas are 55, the nays are
42.
Three-fifths of the Senators duly chosen and sworn not having voted
in the affirmative, upon reconsideration, the motion is rejected.
The Senator from Arizona.
Mr. McCAIN. Madam President, I was about to leave the Chamber, but in
light of the results of the last vote, I am compelled--I am compelled
to speak out more in disappointment than in rage. Although I think a
lot of men and women who are serving in the military who are dependent
on what we do for their safety and their livelihood, for pure--pure--
partisan and political reasons, we will not be moving forward to
consider a bill to train and equip the men and women who are in the
military, to give them their pay and benefits and defend this Nation.
How? How do you do that in good conscience? I understand we are in an
election year. I understand all that, but how in the world do you
refuse to take up legislation that its only purpose is to defend this
Nation, which is under assault?
I just came back from spending the Fourth of July with the troops in
Afghanistan. They depend on us. They depend on us. We are their elected
representatives, and what have we done now? We refuse to move forward
with legislation that allows them to defend themselves, and they are in
harm's way.
All I can say is that when we see polling data that shows the
American people have a very low opinion of us--I see numbers, 13, 14
percent of the American people approve of Congress--this is validation.
This is validation of their absolute disgust with our failure to do the
work to protect the Nation. Isn't that our first priority? That has
always been mine, to secure the Nation, to make sure we protect
ourselves as much as possible. We rely on these young men and women. We
rely on them to defend the Nation, and now we will not even act to
train, arm, equip, pay, and care for them. That is disgraceful. That is
disgraceful.
Yes, this side of the aisle has been guilty of partisan behavior, and
I will plead guilty to all that. But how in the world--how in the world
do you go back to your home State, as we will tonight and tomorrow, and
meet these young men and women who are serving, as is one of the great
privileges we have, and look them in the eye--look them in the eye and
tell them I voted against legislation which was to arm and train and
equip you and protect this Nation. I voted against it because the
Democratic leader said, well, he didn't want an amendment that would
increase spending on defense--on defense.
Without getting too redundant, I hope maybe we might take the next
couple of months before we come back and examine what we are doing and
why we can't agree at least on debating and amending and making
better--which we can do because that is what the Senate is all about.
Can't we do that for them? Do we have to be so divided that we will not
even move forward with perhaps one of the most important pieces of
legislation this body and this Nation is responsible for?
I hope my friends on the other side of the aisle will examine their
conscience.
Madam President, I yield the floor.
I suggest the absence of a quorum.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will call the roll.
The legislative clerk proceeded to call the roll.
Mr. MORAN. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the order for
the quorum call be rescinded.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
____________________