[Congressional Record Volume 162, Number 108 (Wednesday, July 6, 2016)]
[House]
[Page H4280]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
GUN VIOLENCE
The SPEAKER pro tempore. The Chair recognizes the gentleman from
Oregon (Mr. Blumenauer) for 5 minutes.
Mr. BLUMENAUER. Mr. Speaker, last week Congress concluded with a
spotlight on gun safety and the yawning chasm between the attitudes of
the Republican-controlled Congress and the needs and desires of the
American people.
Why should America be the only developed Nation on the planet that
cannot protect its families from gun violence? Obviously, there are no
simple solutions in a Nation where there is a gun for every adult,
where a half-dozen people have been killed in recent years by their
pets, and even babies kill parents and their siblings with guns.
Too many people feel that more guns and fewer protections is the
solution, obscuring the fact that the overwhelming majority of the
American public agrees that there are things we can do and that it is
irresponsible and cynical not to try.
For more than 24 hours last week, my Democratic colleagues and I
discussed many of these solutions on the floor of the House, demanding
action on three. For instance, over 90 percent of the American public
and a majority of gun owners agreed that there should be no anonymous
secret purchases of weapons. There should be a universal background
check. People who cannot buy firearms at a gun store should not be able
to buy guns over the Internet or at gun shows anonymously.
The American public supports us in our efforts to make it harder for
people the government has deemed too dangerous to buy a plane ticket to
purchase assault weapons. And it is past time to eliminate the
outrageous prohibition against the Centers for Disease Control to even
study the epidemic of gun violence that kills three or four Americans
every hour.
These solutions are not really that hard. They would be a signal that
we are serious about trying to change the gun violence equation that
kills about 90 people every day.
I returned to Oregon last week and had encouraging meetings with
dozens of people who have been leading the charge in my home State, who
are redoubling their efforts. They have demonstrated that steps can be
taken through the political process and are committed to building upon
their commonsense actions. For example, they led the charge to prevent
people with a history of domestic violence and restraining orders from
purchasing guns.
The Oregon Legislature finally enacted universal background checks,
like we are seeking at the Federal level, and the Oregon House of
Representatives even passed legislation last session that would have
closed the so-called ``Charleston Loophole'' where law enforcement has
a 10-day delay for a purchase if the police are unable to determine
that purchaser's qualifications.
I was impressed and encouraged that these ordinary citizens, so
devoted to this cause, are committing to taking on the issue further at
the State and local level and making it an issue in the political
elections in the fall wherever they can. It is only that type of
activity that will overcome the inertia, the temerity, and the cynicism
of people who are apologists for gun violence.
The same way we embarked upon a decades-long crusade to reduce
traffic fatalities that cut that death rate in half, we need to embark
on a similar crusade to reduce gun violence.
The Members who took to the floor over 24 hours showed a powerful
expression of policy and emotion that used to be seen on the floor of
this House but is, sadly, seldom in evidence today. But it is not too
late. Congress should do its part to at least allow the issue the
attention and the consideration we would give to any other public
health crisis and end the shame of being the only developed Nation on
the planet that cannot protect its families from gun violence.
____________________