[Congressional Record Volume 162, Number 89 (Tuesday, June 7, 2016)]
[Senate]
[Pages S3558-S3559]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

  SA 4475. Mr. COTTON submitted an amendment intended to be proposed by 
him to the bill S. 2943, to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 
2017 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military 
construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, 
to prescribe military personnel strengths for such fiscal year, and for 
other purposes; which was ordered to lie on the table; as follows:

       At the end of subtitle H of title XII, add the following:

     SEC. 1277. COMPLIANCE ENFORCEMENT REGARDING RUSSIAN 
                   VIOLATIONS OF THE OPEN SKIES TREATY.

       (a) Findings.--Congress makes the following findings:
       (1) According to the President's letter of submittal for 
     the Open Skies Treaty provided to Congress by the Secretary 
     of State on August 12, 1992, it is the purpose of the Open 
     Skies Treaty to promote openness and transparency of military 
     forces and activities and to enhance mutual understanding and 
     confidence by giving States Party a direct role in gathering 
     information about military forces and activities of concern 
     to them.
       (2) According to the Department of State's 2016 Compliance 
     Report, the Russian Federation ``continues not to meet its 
     obligations [under the Open Skies Treaty] to allow effective 
     observation of its entire territory, raising serious 
     compliance concerns''.
       (3) According to the 2016 Compliance Report, Russian 
     conduct giving rise to compliance concerns has continued 
     since the Open Skies Treaty entered into force in 2002 and 
     worsened in 2010, 2014, and 2015.
       (4) According to the 2016 Compliance Report, ongoing 
     efforts by the United States and other States Party to the 
     Open Skies Treaty to address these concerns through dialogue 
     with the Russian Federation ``have not resolved any of the 
     compliance concerns''.
       (5) The Russian Federation has engaged in other activities 
     in coordination with, but outside the scope of, the Open 
     Skies Treaty overflights, which are a cause of concern and 
     should be addressed.
       (6) It is a generally accepted principle of customary 
     international law that in the event of a material breach of a 
     multilateral treaty by one of its parties, a party specially 
     affected by that breach may invoke it as a ground for 
     suspending the operation of the treaty in whole or in part in 
     the relations between itself and the defaulting state.
       (b) Statement of United States Policy.--It is the policy of 
     the United States that--
       (1) restrictions upon the ability of Open Skies Treaty 
     aircraft to overfly all portions of the territory of a State 
     Party impede openness and transparency of military forces and 
     activities and undermine mutual understanding and confidence, 
     especially when coupled with an ongoing refusal to address 
     compliance concerns raised by other States Party subject to 
     such restrictions;
       (2) it is essential to the accomplishment of the object and 
     purpose of the Open Skies Treaty that Open Skies Treaty 
     aircraft be able to overfly all portions of the territory of 
     a State Party in a timely and reciprocal manner;
       (3) restrictions upon the ability of Open Skies Treaty 
     aircraft to overfly all portions of the territory of the 
     Russian Federation constitute a material breach of the Open 
     Skies Treaty;
       (4) in light of the Russian Federation's material breach of 
     the Open Skies Treaty, the United States is legally entitled 
     to suspend the operation of the Open Skies Treaty in whole or 
     in part for so long as the Russian Federation continues to be 
     in material breach of the Open Skies Treaty;
       (5) for so long as the Russian Federation remains in 
     noncompliance with the Open Skies Treaty, the United States 
     should--
       (A) suspend certification or operation of new sensors for 
     Russian overflights of the United States pursuant to the Open 
     Skies Treaty;
       (B) place restrictions upon Russian overflights of the 
     United States in response to Russian restrictions placed upon 
     United States overflights of the Russian Federation; and
       (C) use appropriate additional measures to encourage the 
     Russian Federation's return to compliance with the Open Skies 
     Treaty; and
       (6) during a period of Open Skies Treaty suspension or 
     curtailment, the Director of National Intelligence, in 
     coordination with the Secretary of State and the Secretary of 
     Defense, shall coordinate with parties to Open Skies Treaty 
     that are not the Russian Federation and Belarus, and fulfill 
     imagery requirements of those parties in a manner relative to 
     that provided by Open Skies Treaty collection.
       (c) Report Required.--Not later than 60 days after the date 
     of the enactment of this Act, and annually thereafter 
     together with the Annual Arms Control and Verification 
     Compliance Report defined in subsection (e), the Secretary of 
     State, with the concurrence of the Secretary of Defense and 
     the Director of National Intelligence, shall submit to the 
     appropriate congressional committees a report that contains 
     the following elements:
       (1) A description of all outstanding concerns regarding 
     compliance by the Russian Federation with its obligations 
     under the Open Skies Treaty.
       (2) A description of all consistency, counterintelligence, 
     and other intelligence related issues that have arisen over 
     the previous year, including Russian Federation sensor or 
     equipment anomalies, intelligence actives carried out in 
     coordination with Open Skies Treaty overflights, and other 
     intelligence concerns as determined by the Director of 
     National Intelligence.
       (3) A description of all compliance dialogue, diplomatic 
     engagement, or other interactions between the United States 
     and the Russian Federation with regard to concerns about 
     actual or potential Russian noncompliance with the Open Skies 
     Treaty, as well as any such dialogue, engagement, or 
     interactions between other Open Skies Treaty parties and the 
     Russian Federation with regard to concerns about Russian 
     actual or potential Russian noncompliance.
       (4) A United States strategy for bringing the Russian 
     Federation into full compliance with its obligations under 
     the Open Skies Treaty, including--
       (A) an assessment of the tools available to the United 
     States for purposes of enforcing compliance with the Open 
     Skies Treaty, including--
       (i) bilateral or multilateral compliance dialogue;
       (ii) the imposition of restrictions upon Russian 
     overflights pursuant to the Open Skies Treaty, either by the 
     United States or other States Party; and
       (iii) the use of pressures or points of political, 
     economic, or military leverage separate from the Open Skies 
     Treaty.
       (B) a description of how United States compliance dialogue 
     with the Russian Federation about the Open Skies Treaty 
     incorporates and integrates the tools described in 
     subparagraph (A); and
       (C) an assessment of whether the Russian Federation is 
     expected to return to full compliance with the Open Skies 
     Treaty, and if so, when and under what conditions this is 
     most likely to occur.
       (5) An assessment of the benefits the Russian Federation 
     receives from the conduct of Open Skies Treaty overflights 
     over European countries and the United States, including--
       (A) The value of such information collection relative to 
     other sources of information available to the Russian 
     Federation; and
       (B) A description of the types of United States and 
     European targets over which Russian overflights pursuant to 
     the Open Skies Treaty have flown, how this target set has 
     evolved over the course of the Russian Federation's Open 
     Skies overflights, and how this target set relates to current 
     Russian military doctrine and planning.
       (6) An assessment of the intelligence value of Open Skies 
     information to States Party to the Open Skies Treaty, other 
     than the

[[Page S3559]]

     United States or the Russian Federation, relative to other 
     sources of information available to such States Party, 
     including commercially-available satellite imagery.
       (7) The impact of Russian noncompliance with the Open Skies 
     Treaty and other international agreements or commitments 
     relating to arms control, international security, or crisis 
     prevention or stability, including the INF Treaty, the 
     Incidents at Sea Agreement, and the Budapest Memorandum, the 
     Biological Weapons Convention, and the CFE Treaty, upon 
     defense and security planning in and among States Party to 
     the Open Skies Treaty, including members of the North 
     Atlantic Treaty Organization.
       (d) Form of Report.--The report required by subsection (c) 
     shall be submitted in an unclassified form, but may include a 
     classified annex.
       (e) Definitions.--In this section:
       (1) Annual arms control and verification compliance 
     report.--The term ``Annual Arms Control and Verification 
     Compliance Report'' means the annual Adherence to and 
     Compliance with Arms Control, Nonproliferation, and 
     Disarmament Agreements and Commitments report required under 
     section 403 of the Arms Control and Disarmament Act (22 
     U.S.C. 2593a).
       (2) Appropriate congressional committees defined.--The term 
     ``appropriate congressional committees'' means--
       (A) the Committee on Foreign Affairs, the Committee on 
     Appropriations, the Committee on Armed Services, and the 
     Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate; and
       (B) the Committee on Foreign Relations, the Committee on 
     Appropriations, the Committee on Armed Services, and the 
     Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of 
     Representatives.
       (3) Biological weapons convention.--The term ``Biological 
     Weapons Convention'' means the Convention on the Prohibition 
     of the Development, Production and Stockpiling of 
     Bacteriological and Toxin Weapons and on Their Destruction, 
     done at London, Moscow, and Washington April 10, 1972, and 
     entered into force March 26, 1975.
       (4) Budapest memorandum.--The term ``Budapest Memorandum'' 
     means the Memorandum on Security Assurances in Connection 
     with Ukraine's Accession to the Treaty on the Non-
     Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, done at Budapest December 
     5, 1994.
       (5) CFE treaty.--The term ``CFE Treaty'' means the Treaty 
     on Conventional Armed Forces in Europe done at Vienna 
     November 19, 1990, and entered into force November 9, 1992.
       (6) 2016 compliance report.--The term ``2016 Compliance 
     Report'' means the Report on Adherence to and Compliance With 
     Arms Control, Nonproliferation, and Disarmament Agreements 
     and Commitments published by the United States Department of 
     State on April 11, 2016.
       (7) Incidents at sea agreement.--The term ``Incidents at 
     Sea Agreement'' means the Agreement Between the Government of 
     The United States and the Government of The Union of Soviet 
     Socialist Republics on the Prevention of Incidents On and 
     Over the High Seas, done at Moscow on May 25, 1972, and 
     entered into force on May 25, 1972.
       (8) INF treaty.--The term ``INF Treaty'' means the 
     Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty, done at Washington 
     December 8, 1987, and entered into force June 1, 1988.
       (9) Open skies treaty.--The term ``Open Skies Treaty'' 
     means the Treaty on Open Skies, done at Helsinki March 24, 
     1992, and entered into force January 1, 2002.
                                 ______