[Congressional Record Volume 162, Number 88 (Monday, June 6, 2016)]
[Senate]
[Pages S3467-S3468]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

  SA 4444. Mrs. MURRAY (for herself and Ms. Cantwell) submitted an 
amendment intended to be proposed by her to the bill S. 2943, to 
authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2017 for military activities 
of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for 
defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military 
personnel strengths for such fiscal year, and for other purposes; which 
was ordered to lie on the table; as follows:

       Strike section 3122 and insert the following:

     SEC. 3122. ANALYSIS OF APPROACHES FOR SUPPLEMENTAL TREATMENT 
                   OF LOW-ACTIVITY WASTE AT HANFORD NUCLEAR 
                   RESERVATION.

       (a) In General.--Not later than 60 days after the date of 
     the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Energy shall 
     enter into an arrangement with a federally funded research 
     and development center to conduct an analysis of approaches 
     for treating the portion of low-activity waste at the Hanford 
     Nuclear Reservation, Richland, Washington, that, as of such 
     date of enactment, is intended for supplemental treatment.
       (b) Elements.--The analysis required by subsection (a) 
     shall include the following:

[[Page S3468]]

       (1) An analysis of, at a minimum, the following approaches 
     for treating the low-activity waste described in subsection 
     (a):
       (A) Further processing of the low-activity waste to remove 
     long-lived radioactive constituents, particularly technetium-
     99 and iodine-129, for immobilization with high-level waste.
       (B) Vitrification, grouting, and steam reforming, and other 
     alternative approaches identified by the Department of Energy 
     for immobilizing the low-activity waste.
       (2) An analysis of the following:
       (A) The risks of the approaches described in paragraph (1) 
     relating to treatment and final disposition.
       (B) The benefits and costs of such approaches.
       (C) Anticipated schedules for such approaches, including 
     the time needed to complete necessary construction and to 
     begin treatment operations.
       (D) The compliance of such approaches with applicable 
     technical standards associated with and contained in 
     regulations prescribed pursuant to the Comprehensive 
     Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 
     1980 (42 U.S.C. 9601 et seq.), the Solid Waste Disposal Act 
     (42 U.S.C. 6901 et seq.) (commonly referred to as the 
     ``Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976''), the 
     Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.) 
     (commonly referred to as the ``Clean Water Act''), and the 
     Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.).
       (E) Any obstacles that would inhibit the ability of the 
     Department of Energy to pursue such approaches.
       (c) Review of Analysis.--
       (1) In general.--Concurrent with entering into an 
     arrangement with a federally funded research and development 
     center under subsection (a), the Secretary of Energy shall 
     enter into an arrangement with the National Academies of 
     Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine to conduct a review of 
     the analysis conducted by the federally funded research and 
     development center.
       (2) Method of review.--The review required by paragraph (1) 
     shall be conducted concurrent with the analysis required by 
     subsection (a), and in a manner that is parallel to that 
     analysis, so that the results of the review may be used to 
     improve the quality of the analysis.
       (3) Public review.--The review required paragraph (1) shall 
     include an opportunity for public comment, with sufficient 
     notice, to inform and improve the quality of the review.
       (d) Consultation With State.--Prior to the submission in 
     accordance with subsection (e)(2) of the analysis required by 
     subsection (a) and the review of the analysis required by 
     subsection (c), the federally funded research and development 
     center and the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, 
     and Medicine shall provide to the State of Washington--
       (1) the analysis and review in draft form; and
       (2) an opportunity to comment on the analysis and review 
     for a period of not fewer than 60 days.
       (e) Submission to Congress.--
       (1) Briefings on progress.--Not later than 180 days after 
     the date of the enactment of this Act, and every 180 days 
     thereafter, the Secretary of Energy shall provide to the 
     congressional defense committees, including the Subcommittee 
     on Energy and Water Development of the Committee on 
     Appropriations of the Senate and the Subcommittee on Energy 
     and Water Development, and Related Agencies of the Committee 
     on Appropriations of the House of Representatives, a briefing 
     on the progress being made on the analysis required by 
     subsection (a) and the review required by subsection (c).
       (2) Completed analysis and review.--Not later than 2 years 
     after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of 
     Energy shall submit to the congressional defense committees 
     described in paragraph (1) the analysis required by 
     subsection (a), the review of the analysis required by 
     subsection (c), any comments of the State of Washington under 
     subsection (d)(2), and any comments of the Secretary of 
     Energy on the analysis or review of the analysis.
       (f) Limitations.--
       (1) Secretary of energy.--This section does not conflict 
     with or impair the obligation of the Secretary of Energy to 
     comply with any requirement of--
       (A) the amended consent decree in Washington v. Moniz, No. 
     2:08-CV-5085-RMP (E.D. Wash.); or
       (B) the Hanford Federal Facility Agreement and Consent 
     Order.
       (2) State of washington.--This section does not conflict 
     with or impair the regulatory authority of the State of 
     Washington under the Solid Waste Disposal Act (42 U.S.C. 6901 
     et seq.) (commonly known as the ``Resource Conservation and 
     Recovery Act of 1976'') and any corresponding State law.
                                 ______