[Congressional Record Volume 162, Number 84 (Thursday, May 26, 2016)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E810]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]




                          PERSONAL EXPLANATION

                                 ______
                                 

                           HON. BILL HUIZENGA

                              of michigan

                    in the house of representatives

                         Thursday, May 26, 2016

  Mr. HUIZENGA of Michigan. Mr. Speaker, I rise today regarding missed 
votes on Monday, May 23, 2016 and Tuesday, May 24, 2016 due to my son's 
graduation from high school.
  Had I been present for roll call vote number 229, H.R. 4889, the 
Kelsey Smith Act, I would have voted ``nay.''
  Had I been present for roll call vote number 230, H.R. 3998, the 
Securing Access to Networks in Disaster Act, I would have voted 
``yea.''
  Had I been present for roll call vote number 231, Ordering the 
Previous Question for H. Res. 743, I would have voted ``yea.''
  Had I been present for roll call vote number 232, H. Res. 743, 
Adoption of the Rule Providing for Consideration of H.R. 5055, I would 
have voted ``yea.''
  Had I been present for roll call vote number 233, Ordering the 
Previous Question for H. Res. 742, I would have voted ``yea.''
  Had I been present for roll call vote number 234, H. Res. 742, 
Adoption of the Rule Providing for Consideration of H.R. 897 and H.R. 
2576, I would have voted ``yea.''
  Had I been present for roll call vote number 235, H.R. 5077, the 
Intelligence Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017, I would have voted 
``yea.''
  Had I been present for roll call vote number 236, the Democrat Motion 
to Recommit H.R. 897, I would have voted ``nay.''
  Had I been present for roll call vote number 237, H.R. 897, the Zika 
Vector Control Act, I would have voted ``yea.''
  Had I been present for roll call vote number 238, Passage of the 
House Amendment to the Senate Amendment to H.R. 2576, the Frank R. 
Lautenberg Chemical Safety for the 21st Century Act, I would have voted 
``yea.''

                          ____________________