[Congressional Record Volume 162, Number 81 (Monday, May 23, 2016)]
[Senate]
[Pages S3041-S3042]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
LABOR DEPARTMENT PENSION RULE
Ms. WARREN. Madam President, 8 years ago reckless bankers on Wall
Street sparked a financial meltdown. Their too-big-to-fail banks
gambled with our economy, encouraging reckless mortgage lending by
funding the slimy subprime lenders who peddled their miserable products
to millions of American families. Those same banks then gobbled up
those dangerous mortgages, repackaged them, and spread huge risks
throughout the financial system.
The consequences were disastrous. Wall Street greed destroyed $7
trillion in housing wealth and resulted in millions of Americans losing
their homes. It killed 8.7 million American jobs. It gutted hundreds of
pension funds, leaving millions of retirees hung out to dry.
Thanks to Washington bailouts, Wall Street is once again flying high.
Corporate profits are up, and the stock market is soaring. But the real
people who were hurt by the financial collapse--the millions of workers
who lost their jobs, lost their homes, and lost their retirement
savings because of
[[Page S3042]]
Wall Street's reckless greed--many of them haven't bounced back. The
evidence of this is everywhere, but consider just one recent example.
Earlier this month, 400,000 participants in the Central States Pension
Fund narrowly escaped having their hard-earned pension benefits slashed
by as much as 70 percent. Their benefits were on the chopping block
because that fund is in terrible trouble. There are a lot of reasons
why, but one reason is beyond dispute: Wall Street greed.
The story is ugly. In the runup to the financial collapse, Goldman
Sachs and Northern Trust were in charge of managing the Central States
Pension Fund and making its investment decisions. Instead of doing what
was best for workers and retirees, these financial giants invested
those retirement savings in junk bonds and mortgage bonds issued by
firms whose names today would fill a Wall Street Hall of Shame: Bear
Stearns, Countrywide, IndyMac, and Lehman Brothers.
The crash of 2008 hit the Central States Pension Fund like a shiv in
the ribs. In 15 months in 2008 and early 2009, pension assets managed
by Goldman Sachs and Northern Trust dropped by 42 percent. That is more
than twice the losses suffered by other multi-employer pension funds.
And to add salt to the wound--the part that really twists the knife
here--from 2005 to 2009, Goldman Sachs and Northern Trust charged
Central States $41 million for the privilege of managing and wrecking
their retirement fund.
Last month the Treasury Department rejected pension cuts to the
Central States Pension Fund for the short term and bought these
retirees some time. But this story isn't over. Unless the Senate acts,
this pension plan will collapse within 10 years. Unless the Senate
acts, hundreds of thousands of retirees whose pensions are currently on
life support will lose those pensions entirely.
Tomorrow the Republicans, who control the Senate, are ready to act.
Tomorrow they will bring a pension bill to the floor. Is it a bill to
help save the 400,000 men and women of the Central States Pension Fund
whose futures were decimated through no fault of their own? On that
topic, the Republicans have nothing to say. Instead, the Republicans
are bringing up a bill to make it easier--easier--for giant Wall Street
financial institutions to cheat Americans out of their retirement
savings.
The Senate will be voting to make it easier for shady financial
institutions and unscrupulous financial advisers to mislead investors
about the quality of the investments so those advisers can continue
pushing lousy products, just like the junk bonds and mortgage funds
that tanked the Central States pension plan. The Senate will be voting
on whether to overturn the commonsense regulations the Department of
Labor completed last month to protect Americans' hard-earned retirement
savings from slick-talking advisers who push complicated products that
give great payoffs to the advisers and terrible results for their
customers.
Here is the problem: Because of loopholes in the law, it has long
been perfectly legal for investment advisers to push products that
drain away customer savings while they generate high fees, free
vacations, cars, bonuses, and kickbacks for the advisers. These
conflicts cost American families an estimated $17 billion every year.
The new commonsense rule would put a stop to these practices. It is a
pretty simple rule. It would ensure that financial advisers have to
recommend products that are in the customers' best interests. No more
pushing products just to generate high fees and payments for the
advisers. No more free vacations. No more kickbacks. Why would anyone
on Earth vote to overturn a rule designed to protect Americans from
financial fraud? Why? Because it is an election year, so Senators and
Congressmen have their hands out, willing to take every dime of Wall
Street money they can get. Killing this new rule will cost American
families $17 billion a year in lost retirement savings, but it will
sure help to fill up the campaign accounts of the Republican Senators
who vote for it. In the meantime, the clock keeps ticking for hundreds
of thousands of Central States retirees, and the Republicans refuse to
do anything.
The Republicans who control the Senate may think that tomorrow's vote
will help their fundraising efforts. Even so, I will be voting no
because we weren't sent here just to raise money for reelections. We
weren't sent here to make money for Wall Street and their armies of
lobbyists and lawyers. We weren't sent here to reward the too-big-to-
fail banks that tanked our economy and then got billions of dollars in
bailouts. We weren't sent here to make it easier for financial
institutions to cheat people. The Republicans who run the Senate seem
to have forgotten that. If they don't remember it soon, you can bet the
American people will remind them in November.
Thank you, Madam President.
I yield the floor.
I suggest the absence of a quorum.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will call the roll.
The bill clerk proceeded to call the roll.
Mr. CORNYN. Madam President, I ask unanimous consent that the order
for the quorum call be rescinded.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
____________________