[Congressional Record Volume 162, Number 79 (Wednesday, May 18, 2016)]
[Senate]
[Pages S2976-S2977]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
By Mr. GRASSLEY (for himself and Mrs. Gillibrand):
S. 2944. A bill to require adequate reporting on the Public Safety
Officers' Benefit program, and for other purposes; to the Committee on
the Judiciary.
Mrs. GILLIBRAND. Mr. President, I rise to speak about a bill I am
introducing along with Senator Grassley called the Public Safety
Officers' Benefits Improvement Act.
When our first responders make the decision to join a police
department or a fire department or an EMT squad, they do so knowing
they might encounter hazards on the job that threaten their lives or
even end their lives. These men and women work in some of the highest
pressure and most dangerous environments--shootouts, fires, natural
disasters, terror attacks.
Think about your own communities back home. When disaster strikes,
when there is an emergency, who shows up first, speeding to the scene
and ready to help? It is our police officers, it is our firefighters,
and it is our EMT workers. Our public safety officers know that death
or serious injury is a real risk in their jobs, but they show up to
work anyway, ready to help and willing to sacrifice, if that is what it
takes to keep their communities safe.
When first responders die as a result of their work, we all have the
responsibility to help take care of their surviving family members. In
1984, more than three decades ago, Congress did the right thing and
created a program called the Public Safety Officers' Benefit Program to
help these families.
Whenever a tragedy struck and a first responder was killed on the job
or passed away because of their job, these grieving families could take
a little bit of comfort in knowing they would have the financial
support they needed with this program. They knew they would have help
from this program, transitioning to a life without their loved one.
In recent years, the families applying to the program have faced
confusing and inconsistent requirements. They have faced long delays in
receiving compensation. Before, when a loved one died on the job, the
family would get compensation from this program without any serious
delay. But now the burden to claim these funds and then retrieve them
has been placed on the families--the same families this program is
supposed to be helping.
As a result, hundreds of families who are already grieving now have
to dig through public records themselves. They have to endure an
exhausting paper chase with no guidance. And they have to go far beyond
a reasonable doubt to prove to the Justice Department that their loved
one did, in fact, serve as a first responder and sacrificed his or her
life for this job.
Last fall, USA Today reported that of the more than 900 cases they
reviewed, the average wait for a decision by the program about
compensation was more than 1 year. For some families, it was 2 years,
and for some, the wait was 3 years. This even includes our first
responders who worked at Ground Zero. Think about the unnecessary
stress these delays have placed on our families who lost loved ones.
We know we must fix this program. We must fix this program. These
families of our fallen public safety officers are not getting the
compensation they deserve, that their loved ones have earned, in the
timely manner they need.
This bill--Senator Grassley's and mine--is a bipartisan bill that
fixes this problem. The Public Safety Officers' Benefits Improvement
Act would make this compensation program more transparent and more
efficient, and it would make sure it works.
The bill would require the program to report publicly the status of
every claim so that families can know if and why their compensation is
being delayed. It would give weight to the findings and records of
Federal agencies, State agencies, and local agencies about the cause of
the public safety officer's death so that families don't have to
reproduce records that already exist. And this bill would reduce the
wait for our families to receive the compensation they deserve and
desperately need.
I thank my colleague Senator Grassley for his strong leadership and
his amazing advocacy, and I urge all my colleagues here to support this
bill. Let's fix the Public Safety Officers' Benefits Program. Let's
take care of these families--the families of our public safety
officers--and let's do the right thing.
I yield the floor.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from Iowa.
Mr. GRASSLEY. Mr. President, I thank the Senator from New York for
working together on this very important issue to get justice for some
of our police officers and their families who have been burdened by too
much redtape. She and I have worked together on so many things, and I
appreciate this one as well.
In 1962, President John F. Kennedy signed a proclamation designating
this week as National Police Week. As part of that tradition, tens of
thousands of law enforcement officers have gathered in our Nation's
Capital to honor those who have paid the ultimate sacrifice to the
service of this Nation.
I rise to join these officers in thanking the men and women who have
dedicated their lives to protecting our communities. We must never take
their sacrifice for granted, and we need to appreciate that their
surviving families have suffered real loss.
In recognition of this truth, Congress passed the Public Safety
Officers' Benefits Act in 1976. The goal of the law was to provide
death benefits to survivors of officers who die in the line of duty.
Over the years, the law has been amended to provide disability and
education benefits and to expand the pool of officers who are eligible
for these benefits.
Looking at the 40-year history of this law, the overall intent of
Congress is very clear: Families of fallen officers deserve a fair and
timely consideration of their application for these benefits, and the
word ``timely'' is what isn't being carried out right now.
If we were in these officers' shoes, we would like to see an answer--
either yes or no--not years of limbo and lingering uncertainty.
Unfortunately, that is precisely what too many families have had to
endure since at least 2003, all because bureaucrats in the Justice
Department failed to do their job and do it on time.
Three weeks ago, I chaired a Judiciary Committee hearing to examine
this problem on the lack of timeliness. What we found was troubling.
The Justice Department has a goal of processing these claims within 1
year of filing. However, according to the most recent data, the Justice
Department is failing to meet its own 1-year deadline in 61 percent of
the 693 pending death benefit claims. Those are 423 families who have
been waiting for more than 1 year. That rate is unacceptable for a
program designed to support families of fallen officers.
Somehow, the delays have gone from bad to worse. The failure rate was
27 percent for claims that were filed between 2008 and 2013. So it is
very difficult to understand how that could happen.
For 13 years and counting, since 2003, the delays have persisted
despite a 2004
[[Page S2977]]
Attorney General memorandum, despite a 2007 Judiciary Committee
hearing, and despite three independent audits recommending corrective
action. Not surprisingly, there have been periodic improvements in
timeliness whenever Congress or watchdogs shine light into these
delays. However, these improvements have been very short-lived. For
example, in 2007, the Justice Department more than doubled its monthly
rate of processing claims in the first 2 months following a Judiciary
Committee hearing. However, in the ensuing 5 years, the inspector
general found not only significant delays but also a serious lack of
documentation and data.
I began looking into this program last January after constituents
informed me that families in Iowa waited more than 3 years to get a
decision, but the Justice Department's response to my oversight letters
confirmed that these delays persist on a nationwide scale. For
instance, there are currently 175 pending death and disability claims
that were filed on behalf of officers who lost their lives as a result
of their September 11 response efforts. That is why I have written six
letters to the Justice Department in the last 1\1/2\ years asking for
status updates on all pending claims. Initially, after I sent my first
letters, the number of pending claims went down at a steady pace.
However, more recently the Justice Department has simply failed to
respond to my letters.
At last month's Judiciary Committee hearing, a claimant from my State
of Iowa testified about having waited 3\1/2\ years without an answer
from the Justice Department, but just 2 days after that hearing, that
claimant got a phone call from the Department saying the claim had been
approved. What was the Justice Department doing for the past 3\1/2\
years on that claim? And what about the 692 other families who are
waiting for a decision? Families of fallen officers and advocacy groups
agree, transparency leads to accountability, and the Justice Department
should be held accountable for its handling of these claims. So based
on this 13-year record, I have concluded that the best way to ensure
timeliness in these claims is to permanently increase the level of
transparency surrounding this program.
Today the Senator from New York, just speaking, and I are introducing
a bill that would do just that. It is called the Public Safety
Officers' Benefits Improvement Act. This bill would require the Justice
Department to post on its Web site weekly status updates for all
pending claims. This way the public can evaluate how well the
Department is performing under its goal of processing claims within the
1-year filing deadline they have. The Justice Department is already
posting weekly statistics with respect to the September 11th Victims
Compensation Fund, which is a similar program. So the Department should
be able to do the same with respect to pending public safety officers'
benefits claims by posting weekly statistics.
In addition, our bill would require the Justice Department to report
to Congress other aggregate statistics regarding these claims at least
twice a year, and the bill would make it easier for the Justice
Department to process these claims in other ways; for example, by
allowing the Department to rely on other Federal regulatory standards
and to give substantial weight to findings of fact of State, local, and
other Federal agencies.
In short, this is a simple bipartisan bill with narrowly tailored
provisions. Each provision is targeted to specific problems that have
been identified over the past 13 years by independent audits, by
committee hearings, by advocacy groups, and, of course, as we would
expect, by families of fallen officers who wonder what is going on at
the Department of Justice.
So I thank Senator Gillibrand for working with me to develop this
commonsense legislation. I urge my colleagues to stand with us in
support of these officers and their families and help us get this bill
done as our way of saying thank you to these men and women,
particularly as we honor them in this particular season we call
National Police Week.
______