[Congressional Record Volume 162, Number 78 (Tuesday, May 17, 2016)]
[House]
[Pages H2431-H2432]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
BIG GOVERNMENT: TSA'S FAILURES
The SPEAKER pro tempore. The Chair recognizes the gentleman from
Texas (Mr. Poe) for 5 minutes.
Mr. POE of Texas. Mr. Speaker, early in 2015, the Department of
Homeland Security removed the TSA Director and Administrator after it
was revealed that banned items made it through screening in different
parts of our airports throughout the United States.
This didn't happen once or twice, but it happened 67 times out of 70
tries. That is a 90 percent failure rate. Any business would be out of
business if it failed 90 percent of the time to do what it is supposed
to do.
We are not talking about selling goods and services. We are talking
about security--American security. But TSA is a government agency, so,
to me, accountability doesn't seem to be a priority.
After this fiasco in 2015, the Administrator was replaced with a new
Administrator. I don't know that security is better or not--maybe it
is--but we do know that the lines are longer and TSA efficiency is
questionable.
To find that out, just go to any of our airports and try to travel.
Travelers are faced with wait times in excess of 3 hours just to get
through security. Flights are missed and flights are delayed because of
the security chokepoint. It is ironic that people wait in line longer
than it takes them to fly from point A to point B. Security lines
should not take longer than the flight itself, but that is happening in
our airports.
The TSA Director blames the passengers for the delays. So it is not
TSA's fault; it is the flying public's fault for the long lines and
delays?
The cost to American taxpayers for TSA is $7 billion a year. Are we
safer, better off, and more secure because of this massive government
bureaucracy? Americans need to answer that question.
TSA must also work on its treatment of passengers. I constantly hear
in my congressional office from people who travel about the way they
are treated by government employees at TSA when they try to go through
security.
Now, I know a lot of TSA employees. Some of those in Houston are
wonderful people. Yet some TSA employees are rude, demeaning, and
disrespectful to the travelers. That has got to stop. There is no
excuse for it. Flying has become torturous for some travelers because
of TSA.
Homeland Security must figure out a better way to protect and serve
the people, the flying public, without causing people to miss their
flights. Maybe TSA should use trained dogs before and after the
security points to help check for explosives--I am not sure the
answer--but change the current model because it is not working.
This issue must be fixed, and the issue is not to blame the fliers.
The issue is TSA needs to respond to this issue. There are airports all
over the world that screen passengers. Maybe TSA could learn something
from some of these other airports about efficiency and security. This
problem must be fixed, and the answer is not to blame the Americans who
travel and blame them for waiting in line for 3 hours to catch a plane
that flies only 1 hour.
Airports should strongly consider moving to private screeners. The
law allows this to happen, Mr. Speaker, but the law requires that, if
an airport wants to use private screening companies, they must get the
Department of Homeland Security's approval to use that screening
company over TSA. That is an issue in itself. But the answer is not to
continue having the same issues and problems that we now face.
People who travel a lot and travel rarely, when they talk about their
traveling experience, one thing they seem to always mention is the way
they have to go through screening and the way they are treated by TSA.
Remember, a 90 percent failure rate is not acceptable.
The security must be better, and people must be treated better,
because that is just the way it is.
[[Page H2432]]
____________________