[Congressional Record Volume 162, Number 72 (Monday, May 9, 2016)]
[Senate]
[Pages S2645-S2646]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
ENERGY AND WATER DEVELOPMENT APPROPRIATIONS BILL
Mr. ALEXANDER. Mr. President, I would like to make brief comments
concerning the status of the Energy and Water appropriations bill,
following the actions of the majority leader. I said most of what I had
to say earlier.
Here is my view of it. Tonight, and for the third time, the Senate
voted not to end debate on the Energy and Water appropriations bill,
even though we have virtually finished all of our work on it. We have
one difference of opinion, and it is a big one. It is provocative. It
is the Cotton amendment that would prohibit U.S. tax dollars being used
next year to purchase heavy water from Iran.
The majority leader has filed cloture on the Cotton amendment, which
means that after tomorrow--the intervening day--we will have a vote on
the Cotton amendment on Wednesday. We will dispense with it the way we
usually dispense with issues about which we have large differences of
opinion: We vote on them. Sometimes we can work them out, sometimes we
can withdraw them, and sometimes we can't. So we are going to vote on
it. Senator Cotton has said that if he should not win the amendment, he
will withdraw it. That will dispose of the Cotton amendment, and then
we can move on and finish the Energy and Water appropriations bill.
I said earlier today, and I will reiterate, that while I have
defended Senator Cotton's right to offer his amendment--it is germane
and it is relevant--I will vote no on his amendment for two reasons.
One reason is I believe it raises the possibility that if the United
States is not allowed to buy heavy water from Iran, then it puts it on
the international market and it could be purchased by other countries,
such as North Korea, for use in making nuclear weapons.
This is not a vote for or against the Iran nuclear agreement. I am
opposed to that agreement. This is a question about what to do about
the heavy water that Iran has, which it has to get rid of, which can be
used either for peaceful purposes, which we use it for in the United
States when we have it--we use it for the neutron microscope at the Oak
Ridge Laboratory, we use it for fiber optics, we use it for MRI
imaging, we use it in a variety of ways--or it can be used to make
plutonium and nuclear weapons. Now is not the time to be increasing the
possibility that heavy water from Iran could be put on the
international market and sold to a country such as North Korea, which
might use it to make nuclear weapons. That is No. 1.
No. 2, while the amendment is relevant and germane, this is an
amendment that ought to be considered first in the Foreign Relations
Committee or the Armed Services Committee. I get a lot of lectures
sometimes in our Republican lunches about appropriators making
decisions that ought to be in the authorizing committee. Well, this is
one of them. If there were an issue that raises more such complex
national security issues, it would be hard to think of one. Might this
heavy water be used by a country to make nuclear weapons or, on the
other hand, if we purchase it, does it create a market or an incentive
for Iran to produce more heavy water? What happens to India, which
produces heavy water? What happens to Argentina? What happens to the
need of the United States for heavy water, since we don't produce it at
all, yet we need it? Iran produces it. We don't want them to have it.
We don't produce it. We need it. We don't want North Korea to have it.
These are complex national security issues that ought not to be decided
on an amendment to this bill.
I will be voting no on the Cotton amendment because of the fear that
it might create the possibility that putting it on the international
market would put this distilled water, which could be used peacefully,
in the hands of those who might make a bomb with it, and because I
think an appropriate way to handle it is to first allow the Foreign
Relations Committee or the Armed Services Committee to deal with it.
This is a sincere amendment. I have defended the right of the Senator
from Arkansas to offer his amendment. My friends on the other side
don't like the amendment. They see it as provocative. They see it as a
poison pill. That is a difference we will just have to work out over
time.
This is the U.S. Senate. The right way to work out differences we
can't otherwise work out is simply to vote. The majority leader has
made sure we will have a vote on the Cotton amendment by Wednesday.
My hope is that as important as this Energy and Water appropriations
bill is, that Senator Feinstein and I could work with the Democratic
leader and
[[Page S2646]]
the Republican leader and others to see if we might not agree tomorrow
on a way to vote on the Cotton amendment and finish the bill.
As I have said earlier, 80 different Senators have important
provisions in the bill. I know that. I know they are important because
many of my colleagues went home over the last week and took credit for
passing them, even though we have a little more work to do.
So while we have one difference of opinion left--and it is a big
one--I think the majority leader has put us on a path to come to
resolution by Wednesday, and I hope by tomorrow.
Let me conclude by thanking Senator Feinstein. She feels as
passionately about this as Senator Cotton does. Maybe she feels more
passionately about it. I respect and understand that, but I also
respect the fact that she and I are bringing the first appropriations
bill to the floor, and it is our basic constitutional duty to do so. We
haven't had an Energy and Water appropriations bill make it all the way
across the floor under regular order since 2009. That is not the way
the railroad is supposed to run around here. We need to show the
American people that we can resolve our differences and come to a
result, so we will do that. We will have a vote, and then we will
finish the bill. I hope we can do it tomorrow.
I look forward to continuing my discussions with the Senator from
California and other interested Senators to get it resolved.
I thank the Presiding Officer, and I yield the floor.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from California.
Mrs. FEINSTEIN. Mr. President, I rise to thank the distinguished
chairman of the subcommittee for his views and for his very instructive
actions to move this bill to fruition. I know we both think it is an
important bill. We know the subject that Senator Cotton has raised is
also important.
I think there has been a good discussion on it and understanding of
the pros and cons, so I think now we can wait until Wednesday, an hour
after we come in, for the vote, and we will see what the will of the
Senate is.
I want the chairman to know I am very grateful for the actions he has
taken because this is enabling us to pass the bill and see it enacted
into law, we hope.
So thank you very much, Mr. President. I yield the floor.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from Connecticut.
____________________