[Congressional Record Volume 162, Number 64 (Tuesday, April 26, 2016)]
[Senate]
[Pages S2450-S2451]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
AMENDMENT NO. 3202 TO THE ENERGY POLICY MODERNIZATION BILL
Mr. BENNET. Mr. President, I am very pleased with the Senate's show
of support for the Isakson-Bennet amendment, which was a modified
version of the Sensible Accounting to Value Energy Act. We have been
working on this bill together for more than five years.
The SAVE Act simply creates a voluntary program to encourage people
to include energy efficiency in the purchase price of a new or existing
home. It allows sellers the option of providing a HUD-qualified energy
efficiency report to prospective buyers who are applying for a home
mortgage. If that loan is backed by FHA, the energy efficiency of the
home and the cost of a borrower's future energy bills will be taken
into account by the mortgage lender.
Builders and manufacturers are constantly creating new energy
efficient products and features, but the enhanced value and energy
savings achieved by these innovations are not fully realized by the
market. The passage of this amendment will for the first time provide a
mechanism to account for those saving and unlock demand for new energy
efficient products
[[Page S2451]]
and significantly reduce homeowner's utility bills.
Mr. BROWN. Mr. President, would the Senator yield for a question?
I would like to commend my colleagues for their support for energy
efficiency programs that reduce residential energy consumption.
Expanding the use of these technologies in our everyday lives is a
commitment to our future and will create jobs in Ohio.
However, I am also concerned that adjusting underwriting or appraisal
requirements without sufficient protections to ensure a family has the
ability to repay their loan could have unintended consequences that put
our housing market at risk, which I know is not the intention of the
sponsors.
Mr. REED. Mr. President, I would like to associate myself with the
comments made by the Senator from Ohio. I also support the need for
greater energy efficiency and applaud the sponsors of this amendment
for promoting greater energy efficiency. At the same time, I do have
some concerns.
Specifically, I am concerned about whether and how potential energy
savings can safely be incorporated as part of the mortgage underwriting
process at the FHA, especially when there may not be a consensus on how
to define and accurately quantify future energy savings.
Another concern is the interaction of estimated energy savings in the
underwriting and appraisal processes. This could happen because the
SAVE Act requires expected energy cost savings to be used as an offset
to certain regular expenses, such as property taxes, while also
requiring the estimated energy savings of a home to be added to the
home's appraisal. While not the intent of the authors, I am concerned
that this could tilt the mortgage market towards more expensive
products without adequate safeguards to protect borrowers.
Mr. BROWN. Mr. President, we would ask the sponsors of this amendment
to work with us to ensure that we can accomplish our shared goals of
encouraging investment in energy efficient homes while also maintaining
a safe and sound mortgage market for homebuyers.
Mr. BENNET. Mr. President, moving forward, we intend to work with the
Senate Banking Committee and HUD to address any technical or
substantive concerns that have arisen. Specifically, it is our
intention to ensure that FHA has the ability to insure loans for energy
efficient homes while also including protections to maintain accurate
evaluations of a borrower's ability to repay.
Additionally, as this amendment is being implemented, we understand
that HUD's ability to test and modify the savings that may be counted
should be considered. In fact, we considered these concerns while
drafting this legislation. The methodology we included for measuring
energy efficient savings is an ANSI certified standard and the most
widely accepted technology in today's marketplace. Over 1 million homes
have already been energy rated using this technology. And this is the
same underlying technology successfully utilized by the EPA's Energy
Star program.
Again, we are pleased that the Senate passed our amendment, and we
look forward to working with the Banking Committee and HUD on
improvements.
____________________