[Congressional Record Volume 162, Number 61 (Wednesday, April 20, 2016)]
[House]
[Page H1858]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]




                             END HUNGER NOW

  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The Chair recognizes the gentleman from 
Massachusetts (Mr. McGovern) for 5 minutes.
  Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, on April 1, thousands of poor Americans 
started losing their SNAP, or food stamp, benefits.
  All told, over the course of this year, as many as 1 million adults 
will be cut off from SNAP. That is because one of the harshest 
provisions in the 1996 welfare reform law says that adults working less 
than 20 hours a week or not enrolled in a job training program can only 
receive 3 months of SNAP in a 36-month period.
  The problem is, however, that many areas of the country haven't fully 
recovered from the recession. There are no open jobs, and worker 
training slots are all full.
  The economic recovery has been uneven across the country, and for 
many individuals--through no fault of their own--getting back to work 
has been difficult.
  At the height of the recession, Governors across this country, both 
Democratic and Republican, asked the U.S. Department of Agriculture to 
allow them to temporarily waive work requirements and provide SNAP 
benefits to unemployed, childless adults for longer periods of time.
  But now some Governors are refusing to extend those work waivers even 
in areas of their States with high unemployment. For 1 million of the 
poorest Americans, to lose food assistance in the midst of this is 
unconscionable.
  Mr. Speaker, we are talking about the poorest of the poor. These are 
childless adults whose income averages 29 percent of the poverty line, 
or about $3,400 a year, a year. No one can live on that.
  Many face multiple barriers to employment, including disability, 
limited education, and chronic homelessness. Their employment can be 
sporadic, often cycling in and out of low-wage jobs with unpredictable 
hours that do not lift them out of poverty.
  What is most appalling is that about 60,000 of those who will be cut 
off from SNAP this year are veterans. That is right. These are the 
brave men and women who stood up to protect our country, and now we 
don't have the decency to help them put food on the table when they 
come home. We should be ashamed.
  Mr. Speaker, let me be clear about something. The 3-month limit on 
childless adults receiving SNAP is not a work requirement, despite what 
some of my Republican colleagues say. It is a time limit. There is no 
requirement that States offer work or job training to those who are 
about to lose their benefit. There is nothing here that incentivizes 
work. Rather, it penalizes those who are struggling the most.
  Work requirements and other Federal assistance programs typically 
require people to look for work or accept any job or job training slot 
that is offered, but do not cut people off who are willing to work and 
are looking for a job simply because they cannot find one.
  But that is not the case with SNAP. So individuals who have been 
searching for a job for months, who have applied to every job posting 
they have seen, and who can't get into a job training program because 
the wait list is too long are punished.
  Study after study shows that the longer someone is unemployed, the 
harder it is to get hired. It is baffling to me that the Republicans' 
answer to them is: Sorry. You are out of luck.
  The Bureau of Labor Statistics estimates that it takes someone who is 
unemployed about 6 months of looking to find a job.

                              {time}  1030

  That is twice as long as the 3-month time limit. For the life of me, 
I can't understand how making someone hungrier helps them find a job 
faster. We should be making people's lives better, not harder.
  This notion that some on the Republican side peddle that somehow SNAP 
is this overly generous program that people are just jumping to get 
into, it is ridiculous. It is false. The average SNAP benefit is $1.40 
per meal per day. That is meager. It is inadequate.
  And this idea that SNAP is the root of our budget problems is 
outrageous. New data released from the Department of Treasury just last 
week shows that SNAP spending is falling. In the first half of the 
current fiscal year, SNAP spending was at its lowest level since 2010. 
Not only that, but SNAP caseloads are falling, too. That is due to the 
improving economy.
  SNAP operated like it was supposed to during the recession. It was 
expanded to meet the needs of the millions who lost their jobs, of 
middle class families who never imagined they would need food 
assistance in the first place. And now, as our economy improves, fewer 
people need the assistance. But we are not there yet.
  Cutting 1 million of the poorest Americans off from food assistance 
is wrong. Increasing hunger is wrong. And I would say to the Republican 
leadership of this House, the narrative that you have put forward about 
those in poverty does not reflect the reality. Rather than demonize the 
poor and diminish their struggle, we ought to come together to help, 
not hurt, people. We ought to end hunger now. This war on the poor has 
to stop.

                          ____________________