[Congressional Record Volume 162, Number 39 (Thursday, March 10, 2016)]
[Senate]
[Pages S1416-S1418]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
SENATE ACCOMPLISHMENTS
Mr. GRASSLEY. Madam President, as many Iowans know, I made a practice
of holding townhall meetings in each of the 99 counties of my State
every year. It has become known in the media as a ``Full Grassley.''
That is not something I named it. That is something someone else named
it. It is kind of a flattering name, but in some ways it does not make
sense because the townhalls are not about Senator Grassley. They are
about hearing from Iowans whom I am proud to serve. They are about
hearing about the real problems my constituents have, and, of course,
from our end, trying to find practical solutions to those problems.
That is what I work on every day. I suppose all of my colleagues would
say that is what they work on every day.
On many occasions at my townhall meetings in recent years, Iowans
have asked me why the Senate never gets anything done. Both parties
probably shoulder some of the blame for this attitude out there at the
grassroots, but the reality is that the most obvious, the most glaring,
the most unmistakable reason for the Senate's recent paralysis is the
way Democratic Leader Reid ran it before he was toppled as majority
leader.
When the Democratic leader was in control of the Senate, he was the
one who decided not to empower his committee chairs to craft and
advance bipartisan legislation. He decided not to
[[Page S1417]]
give all Members, Republican and Democratic alike, a real opportunity
to participate in the process. He decided not to empower the Senate to
address real problems that real people face every day.
Instead, he chose dysfunction and gridlock over practicality and
problem solving. By November 2014, the American people had finally had
enough. After the American people spoke, the Democratic leader no
longer controlled the Senate. Since the Senate has been under
Republican leadership, things have started to work again. You see it in
the latest example of this bill passing almost unanimously. So this is
an example of Senators partnering across the aisle. Legislation is
moving. The result is real progress on real issues facing our country.
I am proud the Judiciary Committee has played its part. As chairman,
my goal has been to open the process and seek as much consensus as
possible. The results reflect that. We have reported 21 bills out of
committee, all with bipartisan support. I would like to walk through
some of these results because there is a lot of credit to go around on
both sides of the aisle.
Last February the committee passed the Justice for Victims of
Trafficking Act. We passed it unanimously, 19 to 0. The bill enhances
penalties for human trafficking and equips law enforcement with new
tools to target predators who traffic in innocent young people. The
bill passed the Senate 99 to 0 and was passed into law.
Yes, there were some bumps along the way. When the Democratic leader
realized that genuine bipartisanship had broken out and that we might
actually accomplish something, a controversy had to be manufactured
about the Hyde amendment on that particular trafficking bill, but
eventually the Democratic leader took yes for an answer and the bill
got done.
This victory was a credit to the leadership of one Democrat and one
Republican--Senator Cornyn and Senator Klobuchar. Their bill provided
real solutions for real victims of trafficking. A few months later, in
October, the committee passed the Sentencing Reform and Corrections
Act. Sentencing reform is a difficult and complex issue. Many Senators
have strongly held views. Despite that, the bill emerged from our
committee with a strong 15-to-5 bipartisanship vote. My bill would
recalibrate prison sentences for certain drug offenders, target violent
criminals, and grant judges greater discretion at sentencing for low-
level, nonviolent drug crimes. I am grateful for the Senators who have
partnered with me on this legislation, especially Senators Durbin,
Cornyn, Whitehouse, and Lee. I am hopeful that if we keep working
together, landmark sentencing reform can be another major
accomplishment of this Senate. Time is growing short, but I cannot
think of a more productive use of the Senate's time than to make our
criminal laws more just. This is another example of a real problem we
can solve together.
Also, in July of last year, the committee passed my Juvenile Justice
and Delinquency Prevention Reauthorization Act, again, without
opposition. The bill will ensure that at-risk youth are fairly and
effectively served by juvenile justice grant programs. These important
programs provide the chance for kids to get back on the right track so
they will not enter the criminal justice system as adults. Every one of
these young people are worth helping to reach their greatest potential.
Senator Whitehouse, a Democrat from Rhode Island, and I are working
hard to move this bill through the full Senate. I thank him for working
with me on it.
There are many other bipartisan accomplishments of this Senate that
the Judiciary Committee cannot take credit for. I will not try to go
through all of them, of course, but one example that comes to mind was
the outstanding work of Senator Burr, a Republican, Senator Feinstein,
a Democrat, on the cyber security bill. That legislation passed the
Senate on a solid 74-to-21 vote. A conference version of it was later
signed into law by the President. With reports of breaches of our
personal data on an almost daily basis, it is self-evident that this
bill helped to address a real problem that has affected millions of
Americans.
That brings me to the Senate's passage of the bill that was just
voted on, the Comprehensive Addiction and Recovery Act--CARA, for
short. It passed today with an overwhelming bipartisan vote. This
legislation reflects the Senate at its finest, working in a bipartisan
way to address an awful epidemic that is gripping our country.
I thank the authors of CARA for their leadership in crafting the
legislation and working with me to move it through the Judiciary
Committee and out of that committee unanimously. In particular, I thank
Senators Portman, Ayotte, Whitehouse, and Klobuchar; you see, two
Democrats and two Republicans. Real lives will be saved because of the
leadership of this bipartisan group. That is not something we can say
every day around the Senate. I know the efforts of those Senators and
others to address this epidemic stretch back a few years.
It is a shame the Democratic leader decided not to address this
crisis at the early stage when he was deciding the agenda of the
Senate, but he decided not to act, even in the face of mounting
evidence that the country was facing a grave and gathering epidemic of
heroin and opioid painkiller overdoses. Deaths from prescription opioid
painkillers rose over 30 percent from 2007 to 2014. Heroin overdose
deaths more than quadrupled during that time. Heroin seizures at the
southwest border more than quadrupled as well. All the while, the
Democratic leader never brought a bill to the floor to address the
crisis.
So given the dysfunction that had overtaken the Senate not long ago,
we should take a moment to appreciate the bipartisan process through
which the Senate just passed this CARA bill. As the Republican chairman
of the Judiciary Committee, I moved a Democratic bill through the
committee. It passed without opposition. Then the Republican leader
promptly scheduled the bill for floor consideration. I don't recall
that ever happening under the former Democratic leadership. The Senate
had rollcall votes on four amendments, although the Republican leader
offered more such votes on Democratic amendments. All four of those
amendments were offered by Democratic Senators, and the bill passed
overwhelmingly, as amended. This process would have been unthinkable
under the Democratic leader. This simply would not have happened. You
know the statistics. There were 18 rollcall votes on amendments all
during the year 2014. During 2015, we had 198 rollcall votes on
amendments and only 4 more Republican amendments than Democratic
amendments.
Yes, once again the Democratic leader tried to manufacture a
controversy when this bill first came to the floor about a week ago
Monday, this time over some alleged funding for this heroin-opioid
epidemic. But when $400 million in newly appropriated money for it
hasn't even been spent yet, well, that argument by the Democratic
leader was a tough one to sell.
Over the last few days, the Democratic leader played some games with
negotiations on a managers' package of amendments. The Republican side,
the majority side, worked hard to clear amendments offered by many
Democrats, including Senators Durbin, Gillibrand, Heinrich, Kaine,
McCaskill, Blumenthal, Schatz, Heitkamp, and Cardin, but the Democratic
leader objected to completely uncontroversial, commonsense amendments
that would be in the package offered by two Republicans, Senator
Johnson and Senator Kirk. Why? Simply because these Republican Senators
are up for reelection this year, and under those circumstances, we
couldn't reach an agreement. So all these Democratic amendments didn't
go because the Democratic leader had objection to two Republican,
relatively noncontroversial amendments, one of them absolutely
noncontroversial.
How noncontroversial were these amendments? Let me give you one
example. Senator Johnson wanted to add the Indian Health Service as a
member of the task force the bill creates to develop best prescribing
practices for opioids. I suspect many Americans, including even people
living in the State of Nevada, would think Senator Johnson's idea is a
good one. Addiction is a problem for so many in our country, and the
Native American community is unfortunately no exception. But this is
the kind of dysfunction, the kind of gridlock that the Democratic
leader is known for. A good idea becomes a bad idea if it is simply
offered by a Member
[[Page S1418]]
of the Republican Party, and that especially is the case if you are a
Republican up for reelection.
As CARA's name reflects, the bill addresses this epidemic
comprehensively, supporting prevention, education, treatment, recovery,
and law enforcement. CARA begins with prevention and education. The
bill authorizes awareness and education campaigns so that the public
understands the dangers of becoming addicted. It also creates a
national task force to develop best prescribing practices, as I
mentioned. The bill encourages the use of prescription drug monitoring
programs, such as those in my State of Iowa, which help to detect and
deter what is called doctor shopping behaviors by addicts. The bill
authorizes an expansion of the Federal program that allows patients to
safely dispose of old or unused medications so that these drugs don't
fall into the hands of young people. In fact, along with a few other
committee members, I helped start the original take-back program in
2010 through the Secure and Responsible Drug Disposal Act.
CARA also focuses on treatment and recovery. The bill authorizes
programs to provide first responders with training to use naloxone, a
drug that can reverse the effects of an opioid overdose and directly
save lives. Critically, the bill provides that a set portion of
naloxone funding go to rural areas, like much of Iowa, which are being
affected most acutely. This is critical when someone overdoses and
isn't near a hospital.
The bill also authorizes an expansion of Drug-Free Communities Act
grants to those areas that are most dramatically affected by the opioid
epidemic. And it also authorizes funds for programs that encourage the
use of medication-assisted treatment, provide community-based support
for those in recovery, and address the unique needs of pregnant and
postpartum women who are addicted to opioids.
Finally, the bill also bolsters law enforcement efforts as well. The
bill reauthorizes Federal funding for State task forces that
specifically address heroin trafficking.
So in all these ways, CARA will help real people address the very
real epidemic. The eastern part of my State has been hit the hardest.
The human costs of what is happening across so many of these
communities is incalculable. Every life that is lost or changed forever
by this crisis is precious, especially for many young people who fall
victim to addiction early in their lives. There is so much human
potential at stake.
I can't wait until my next townhall meeting. I am going to be proud
to explain how the Senate did something today that will help so many
people in Iowa and around the Nation, Republicans and Democrats working
together. Let's keep it going.
I yield the floor.
Madam President, I suggest the absence of a quorum.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will call the roll.
The senior assistant legislative clerk proceeded to call the roll.
Mr. UDALL. Madam President, I ask unanimous consent that the order
for the quorum call be rescinded.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
Mr. UDALL. Madam President, I ask unanimous consent to speak in
morning business for such time as I may consume.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
____________________